These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1272516)

  • 1. The influence of discriminations on the form of the contingent negative variation.
    Weinberg H; Michalewski H; Koopman R
    Neuropsychologia; 1976; 14(1):87-95. PubMed ID: 1272516
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of motor-response-deprivation on contingent negative variation (CNV). II. Information of the warning stimulus.
    Nakamura M; Fukui Y; Kadobayashi I; Kato N
    Folia Psychiatr Neurol Jpn; 1976; 30(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 955518
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Electrophysiology and behavior.
    Beck EC
    Annu Rev Psychol; 1975; 26():233-62. PubMed ID: 1094928
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Contingent negative variation and spatial discrimination in children].
    Lancry A
    Rev Electroencephalogr Neurophysiol Clin; 1975; 5(4):376-7. PubMed ID: 1233566
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Average evoked potential changes as a function of processing complexity.
    Poon LW; Thompson LW; Marsh GR
    Psychophysiology; 1976 Jan; 13(1):43-9. PubMed ID: 1244629
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. What is common to brain activity evoked by the perception of visual and auditory filled durations? A study with MEG and EEG co-recordings.
    N'Diaye K; Ragot R; Garnero L; Pouthas V
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2004 Oct; 21(2):250-68. PubMed ID: 15464356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Averaged evoked responses and the encoding of perception.
    Schwartz M
    Psychophysiology; 1976 Nov; 13(6):546-53. PubMed ID: 792943
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Posterior alpha activity during vertex-CNV formation under different stimulating conditions. A new approach.
    Denoth F; Zappoli R; Navona C; Ragazzoni A
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 1984; 425():177-87. PubMed ID: 6588827
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The modality specificity of the slow negative wave.
    Ritter W; Rotkin L; Vaughan HG
    Psychophysiology; 1980 May; 17(3):222-7. PubMed ID: 7384371
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Where to look next? Eye movements reduce local uncertainty.
    Renninger LW; Verghese P; Coughlan J
    J Vis; 2007 Feb; 7(3):6. PubMed ID: 17461684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of visual task difficulty and attentional direction on the detection of acoustic change as indexed by the Mismatch Negativity.
    Muller-Gass A; Stelmack RM; Campbell KB
    Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 1078(1):112-30. PubMed ID: 16497283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Audiovisual temporal discrimination is less efficient with aging: an event-related potential study.
    Setti A; Finnigan S; Sobolewski R; McLaren L; Robertson IH; Reilly RB; Kenny RA; Newell FN
    Neuroreport; 2011 Aug; 22(11):554-8. PubMed ID: 21691233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The relationship between the contingent negative variation and the reaction time under prolonged experimental conditions.
    Näätänen R; Gaillard AW
    Biol Psychol; 1974; 1(4):277-91. PubMed ID: 4425713
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of warning-signal modality on the contingent negative variation (CNV).
    Gaillard AW
    Biol Psychol; 1976 Jun; 4(2):139-54. PubMed ID: 1276304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Synthesis of the contingent negative variation brain potential from noncontingent stimulus and motor elements.
    Rohrbaugh JW; Syndulko K; Sanquist TF; Lindsley DB
    Science; 1980 Jun; 208(4448):1165-8. PubMed ID: 7375925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The scalp topography of potentials in auditory and visual Go/NoGo tasks.
    Simson R; Vaughan HG; Ritter W
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1977 Dec; 43(6):864-75. PubMed ID: 73454
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Mismatch negativity and P300 to behaviorally perceptible and imperceptible temporal contrasts.
    White L; Stuart A; Najem F
    Percept Mot Skills; 2010 Jun; 110(3 Pt 2):1105-18. PubMed ID: 20865999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Selective attention, cortical evoked responses, and brain function in human subjects: a critical review and theory.
    Sabat SR
    Biol Psychol; 1978 Nov; 7(3):175-201. PubMed ID: 369624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Perceptual correlates of variability in the duration of the cortical excitability cycle.
    Coffin S; Ganz L
    Neuropsychologia; 1977; 15(2):231-41. PubMed ID: 846631
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Visual form predictions facilitate auditory processing at the N1.
    Paris T; Kim J; Davis C
    Neuroscience; 2017 Feb; 343():157-164. PubMed ID: 27646290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.