These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

382 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12725180)

  • 41. [Recording otoacoustic emissions in expert evaluation of chronic noise-induced hearing loss].
    Plinkert PK; de Maddalena H
    HNO; 1996 Jun; 44(6):313-8. PubMed ID: 8767127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Evaluation of noise-induced hearing loss with audiometer and distortion product otoacoustic emissions.
    Atchariyasathian V; Chayarpham S; Saekhow S
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2008 Jul; 91(7):1066-71. PubMed ID: 18839846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. A longitudinal study investigating the effects of noise exposure on behavioural, electrophysiological and self-report measures of hearing in musicians with normal audiometric thresholds.
    Couth S; Prendergast G; Guest H; Munro KJ; Moore DR; Plack CJ; Ginsborg J; Dawes P
    Hear Res; 2024 Sep; 451():109077. PubMed ID: 39084132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. [Tinnitus in noise-induced hearing impairment].
    Kowalska S; Sułkowski W
    Med Pr; 2001; 52(5):305-13. PubMed ID: 11828843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Automated pure-tone threshold estimations from extrapolated distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) input/output functions.
    Schmuziger N; Patscheke J; Probst R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Apr; 119(4):1937-9. PubMed ID: 16642804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Early changes in auditory function as a result of platinum chemotherapy: use of extended high-frequency audiometry and evoked distortion product otoacoustic emissions.
    Knight KR; Kraemer DF; Winter C; Neuwelt EA
    J Clin Oncol; 2007 Apr; 25(10):1190-5. PubMed ID: 17401008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Audiological findings among workers from Brazilian small-scale fisheries.
    Paini MC; Morata TC; Corteletti LJ; Albizu E; Marques JM; Santos L
    Ear Hear; 2009 Feb; 30(1):8-15. PubMed ID: 19050644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. [Measuring and analyzing of otoacoustic emission tests of a family with genetic progressive sensorineural hearing loss].
    Yu H; Ke XM; Yu DL; Li Q; Liu YH; Ding GY
    Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 2000 Apr; 14(4):157-9. PubMed ID: 12541488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. [Detection of hearing loss in patrons of a discoteque using TEOAE and DPOAE].
    Liebel J; Delb W; Andes C; Koch A
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1996 May; 75(5):259-64. PubMed ID: 8672207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Amplitude changes in otoacoustic emissions after exposure to industrial noise.
    Baradarnfar MH; Karamifar K; Mehrparvar AH; Mollasadeghi A; Gharavi M; Karimi G; Vahidy MR; Baradarnfar A; Mostaghaci M
    Noise Health; 2012; 14(56):28-31. PubMed ID: 22387710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Otoacoustic emission sensitivity to exposure to styrene and noise.
    Sisto R; Cerini L; Gatto MP; Gherardi M; Gordiani A; Sanjust F; Paci E; Tranfo G; Moleti A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Nov; 134(5):3739-48. PubMed ID: 24180784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Subclinical Auditory Dysfunction: Relationship Between Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emissions and the Audiogram.
    Bramhall NF; McMillan GP; Mashburn AN
    Am J Audiol; 2021 Oct; 30(3S):854-869. PubMed ID: 33465327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Impact of occupational noise on pure-tone threshold and distortion product otoacoustic emissions after one workday.
    Müller J; Janssen T
    Hear Res; 2008 Dec; 246(1-2):9-22. PubMed ID: 18848612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Xylene-induced auditory dysfunction in humans.
    Fuente A; McPherson B; Cardemil F
    Ear Hear; 2013 Sep; 34(5):651-60. PubMed ID: 23598724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. The evaluation of noise-induced hearing loss with distortion product otoacoustic emissions.
    Balatsouras DG
    Med Sci Monit; 2004 May; 10(5):CR218-22. PubMed ID: 15114273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Fine alterations of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions after moderate acoustic overexposure in guinea pigs.
    Kossowski M; Mom T; Guitton M; Poncet JL; Bonfils P; Avan P
    Audiology; 2001; 40(3):113-22. PubMed ID: 11465293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. [Distortion product otoacoustic emissions before and after one year exposure to impulse noise].
    Konopka W; Olszewski J; Pietkiewicz P; Mielczarek M
    Otolaryngol Pol; 2006; 60(2):243-7. PubMed ID: 16903347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Age-related declines in distortion product otoacoustic emissions utilizing pure tone contralateral stimulation in CBA/CaJ mice.
    Varghese GI; Zhu X; Frisina RD
    Hear Res; 2005 Nov; 209(1-2):60-7. PubMed ID: 16061336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. A review of the effectiveness of otoacoustic emissions for evaluating hearing status after newborn screening.
    Janssen T
    Otol Neurotol; 2013 Aug; 34(6):1058-63. PubMed ID: 23628790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Distortion-product otoacoustic emissions and cochlear microphonics: relationships in patients with and without endolymphatic hydrops.
    Fetterman BL
    Laryngoscope; 2001 Jun; 111(6):946-54. PubMed ID: 11404602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.