These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12725771)

  • 21. Effects of speaking rate and vowel length on formant frequency displacement in Japanese.
    Hirata Y; Tsukada K
    Phonetica; 2009; 66(3):129-49. PubMed ID: 19776664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Audibility of American English vowels produced by English-, Chinese-, and Korean-native speakers in long-term speech-shaped noise.
    Liu C; Jin SH
    Hear Res; 2011 Dec; 282(1-2):49-55. PubMed ID: 21920420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Acoustical analysis of Spanish vowels produced by laryngectomized subjects.
    Cervera T; Miralles JL; González-Alvarez J
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2001 Oct; 44(5):988-96. PubMed ID: 11708538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Speech-sound discrimination in neonates as measured with MEG.
    Kujala A; Huotilainen M; Hotakainen M; Lennes M; Parkkonen L; Fellman V; Näätänen R
    Neuroreport; 2004 Sep; 15(13):2089-92. PubMed ID: 15486487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Cerebral generators of mismatch negativity (MMN) and its magnetic counterpart (MMNm) elicited by sound changes.
    Alho K
    Ear Hear; 1995 Feb; 16(1):38-51. PubMed ID: 7774768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The perceptual relevance of locus equations.
    Fruchter D; Sussman HM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1997 Nov; 102(5 Pt 1):2997-3008. PubMed ID: 9373987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Fast parametric evaluation of central speech-sound processing with mismatch negativity (MMN).
    Pakarinen S; Teinonen T; Shestakova A; Kwon MS; Kujala T; Hämäläinen H; Näätänen R; Huotilainen M
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Jan; 87(1):103-10. PubMed ID: 23201145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A vowel is a vowel: generalizing newly learned phonotactic constraints to new contexts.
    Chambers KE; Onishi KH; Fisher C
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 May; 36(3):821-8. PubMed ID: 20438279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The neural basis of sublexical speech and corresponding nonspeech processing: a combined EEG-MEG study.
    Kuuluvainen S; Nevalainen P; Sorokin A; Mittag M; Partanen E; Putkinen V; Seppänen M; Kähkönen S; Kujala T
    Brain Lang; 2014 Mar; 130():19-32. PubMed ID: 24576806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Tempo, stress, and vowel reduction in American English.
    Fourakis M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Oct; 90(4 Pt 1):1816-27. PubMed ID: 1960277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Native non-prototypicality in vowel perception induces prominent neuromagnetic mismatch intensities in non-native speakers: a pilot study.
    Kubota M; Matsuzaki J; Dan I; Dan H; Zouridakis G
    Exp Brain Res; 2021 Mar; 239(3):937-953. PubMed ID: 33438089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Change and novelty detection in speech and non-speech sound streams.
    Sorokin A; Alku P; Kujala T
    Brain Res; 2010 Apr; 1327():77-90. PubMed ID: 20188710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Training the brain to weight speech cues differently: a study of Finnish second-language users of English.
    Ylinen S; Uther M; Latvala A; Vepsäläinen S; Iverson P; Akahane-Yamada R; Näätänen R
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2010 Jun; 22(6):1319-32. PubMed ID: 19445609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The mismatch negativity and reaction time as indices of the perceptual distance between the corresponding vowels of two related languages.
    Savela J; Kujala T; Tuomainen J; Ek M; Aaltonen O; Näätänen R
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2003 Apr; 16(2):250-6. PubMed ID: 12668234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Asymmetrical mismatch negativity in humans as determined by phonetic but not physical difference.
    Ikeda K; Hayashi A; Hashimoto S; Otomo K; Kanno A
    Neurosci Lett; 2002 Mar; 321(3):133-6. PubMed ID: 11880190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Asymmetries in the processing of vowel height.
    Scharinger M; Monahan PJ; Idsardi WJ
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2012 Jun; 55(3):903-18. PubMed ID: 22232394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Durations of American English vowels by native and non-native speakers: acoustic analyses and perceptual effects.
    Liu C; Jin SH; Chen CT
    Lang Speech; 2014 Jun; 57(Pt 2):238-53. PubMed ID: 25102608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Magnetic source imaging of late evoked field responses to vowels: toward an assessment of hemispheric dominance for language.
    Szymanski MD; Perry DW; Gage NM; Rowley HA; Walker J; Berger MS; Roberts TP
    J Neurosurg; 2001 Mar; 94(3):445-53. PubMed ID: 11235950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The effect of segment duration on the perceptual integration of nasals for adult and child speech.
    Ohde RN; Ochs MT
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Oct; 100(4 Pt 1):2486-99. PubMed ID: 8865653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Context-independent dynamic information for the perception of coarticulated vowels.
    Jenkins JJ; Strange W; Trent SA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Jul; 106(1):438-48. PubMed ID: 10420634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.