These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

73 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1272724)

  • 1. Cardiac cycle phase and movement and reaction times.
    Saari MJ; Pappas BA
    Percept Mot Skills; 1976 Jun; 42(3):767-70. PubMed ID: 1272724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Irrelevant visual stimuli improve auditory task performance.
    Thorne JD; Debener S
    Neuroreport; 2008 Mar; 19(5):553-7. PubMed ID: 18388737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Simple reaction time as a function of the phase of the cardiac cycle in young adults at risk for hypertension.
    McIntyre D; Ring C; Edwards L; Carroll D
    Psychophysiology; 2008 Mar; 45(2):333-6. PubMed ID: 17995912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Observing repetitive finger movements modulates response times of auditorily cued finger movements.
    Biermann-Ruben K; Jonas M; Kessler K; Siebner HR; Bäumer T; Schnitzler A; Münchau A
    Brain Cogn; 2008 Oct; 68(1):107-13. PubMed ID: 18433965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Auditory-visual temporal integration measured by shifts in perceived temporal location.
    Jaekl PM; Harris LR
    Neurosci Lett; 2007 May; 417(3):219-24. PubMed ID: 17428607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reaction time facilitation by acoustic task-irrelevant stimuli is not related to startle.
    Lipp OV; Kaplan DM; Purkis HM
    Neurosci Lett; 2006 Dec; 409(2):124-7. PubMed ID: 17010519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Central interference in driving: is there any stopping the psychological refractory period?
    Levy J; Pashler H; Boer E
    Psychol Sci; 2006 Mar; 17(3):228-35. PubMed ID: 16507063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Lateral difference in reaction times to lateralized auditory stimuli.
    Gutnik BJ; Mackie HW; Guo W; Nicholson J
    Indian J Physiol Pharmacol; 2001 Jan; 45(1):63-70. PubMed ID: 11211572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Psychomotor speed in hypertension: effects of reaction time components, stimulus modality, and phase of the cardiac cycle.
    Edwards L; Ring C; McIntyre D; Carroll D; Martin U
    Psychophysiology; 2007 May; 44(3):459-68. PubMed ID: 17433098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cardiac modulation of startle: effects on eye blink and higher cognitive processing.
    Schulz A; Reichert CF; Richter S; Lass-Hennemann J; Blumenthal TD; Schächinger H
    Brain Cogn; 2009 Dec; 71(3):265-71. PubMed ID: 19720438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Simultaneous auditory stimuli shorten saccade latencies.
    Konrad HR; Rea C; Olin B; Colliver J
    Laryngoscope; 1989 Dec; 99(12):1230-2. PubMed ID: 2601535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Synchronous and asynchronous presentations of auditory and visual signals: Implications for control console design.
    Chan AH; Chan KW
    Appl Ergon; 2006 Mar; 37(2):131-40. PubMed ID: 16102721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effects of prepulse inhibition timing on the startle reflex and reaction time.
    Maslovat D; Kennedy PM; Forgaard CJ; Chua R; Franks IM
    Neurosci Lett; 2012 Apr; 513(2):243-7. PubMed ID: 22387455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Relationships between manual reaction time and saccade latency in response to visual and auditory stimuli.
    Engelken EJ; Stevens KW; Enderle JD
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 1991 Apr; 62(4):315-8. PubMed ID: 2031632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Auditory processing in an inter-modal oddball task: effects of a combined auditory/visual standard on auditory target ERPs.
    Brown CR; Clarke AR; Barry RJ
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2007 Aug; 65(2):122-31. PubMed ID: 17481761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of warning stimulus modality on blink startle modification in reaction time tasks.
    Lipp OV; Siddle DA; Dall PJ
    Psychophysiology; 2000 Jan; 37(1):55-64. PubMed ID: 10705767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reaction time effects due to imperative stimulus modality are absent when a startle elicits a pre-programmed action.
    Carlsen AN; Lam MY; Maslovat D; Chua R
    Neurosci Lett; 2011 Aug; 500(3):177-81. PubMed ID: 21723371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Auditory enhancement of visual temporal order judgment.
    Hairston WD; Hodges DA; Burdette JH; Wallace MT
    Neuroreport; 2006 May; 17(8):791-5. PubMed ID: 16708016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of visual task difficulty and attentional direction on the detection of acoustic change as indexed by the Mismatch Negativity.
    Muller-Gass A; Stelmack RM; Campbell KB
    Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 1078(1):112-30. PubMed ID: 16497283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Moderate state-anxiety differently modulates visual and auditory response times in normal- and very low trait-anxiety subjects.
    Hainaut JP; Bolmont B
    Neurosci Lett; 2006 Mar; 395(2):129-32. PubMed ID: 16300894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.