These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12728845)

  • 1. Banking. Supreme Court upholds use of IOLTA accounts for needy.
    AIDS Policy Law; 2003 Apr; 18(7):3. PubMed ID: 12728845
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Supreme Court upholds constitutionality of Hyde Amendment.
    Garn J
    Congr Rec (Dly Ed); 1980 Jun; 126(110):S8994-7. PubMed ID: 11664150
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Complete citations to Supreme Court abortion decisions.
    Report Hum Reprod Law; 1989; 23-24():263-5. PubMed ID: 11686166
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Washington v. Glucksberg and Vacco v. Quill prohibitions on assisted suicide do not violate the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution.
    Kawamura A
    J Contemp Law; 1998; 24(1):167-77. PubMed ID: 14628852
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Are living organisms proper subject matter for a patent? United States Supreme Court to decide question of first impression in Parker v. Bergy.
    Slade RJ; Van den Broder JM
    West State Univ Law Rev; 1979; 7(1):125-131. PubMed ID: 11662797
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Supreme court upholds the ACA--so now what?
    Hosp Peer Rev; 2012 Aug; 37(8):85-7. PubMed ID: 22908387
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Spurned in Texas. Supreme court rejects group's price-fix challenge.
    Blesch G
    Mod Healthc; 2009 Mar; 39(9):14. PubMed ID: 19291851
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A backdoor to policy making: the use of philosophers by the Supreme Court.
    Rao N
    Univ Chic Law Rev; 1998; 65(4):1371-401. PubMed ID: 16273694
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. SUPREME Court decision spurs College to oppose tax deduction of split fees.
    Bull Am Coll Surg; 1952; 37(2):149-51. PubMed ID: 14925521
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. South African court rules against rationing decision.
    Sidley P
    BMJ; 1997 Feb; 314(7078):396. PubMed ID: 9040377
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mississippi Federal Court upholds validity of state Medicaid plan; but rules legal fees are reimbursable.
    Kemezys KP
    Health Law Vigil; 1982 Aug; 5(17):8-10. PubMed ID: 10298613
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Congressional control of federal court jurisdiction: the case study of abortion.
    Greenwood JS
    S C Law Rev; 2003; 54(4):1069-112. PubMed ID: 16493841
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Genetics research and the judicial decisions.
    Chakrabarty AM
    Not Polit; 2002; 18(65):99-102. PubMed ID: 15505918
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [10 years of the Federal Supreme Court. Court decisions in medical jurisprudence in penal cases].
    KOHLHAAS M
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 1962 Jun; 87():1157-8 passim. PubMed ID: 14457827
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Rights talk and its remedies: the jurisprudence of Mary Ann Glendon.
    Hagen JD
    America (NY); 2006 Jan 2-9; 194(1):14-6. PubMed ID: 16459378
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Can the right to autonomy be resuscitated after Glucksberg?
    Safranek JP; Safranek SJ
    Univ Colo Law Rev; 1998; 69(3):731-57. PubMed ID: 16086508
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Abrogating stare decisis by statute: may Congress remove the precedential effect of Roe and Casey?
    Paulsen MS
    Yale Law J; 2001; 109(7):1535-602. PubMed ID: 16281343
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Physician assisted suicide: a constitutional crisis resolved.
    Robinson JH
    Notre Dame J Law Ethics Public Policy; 1999; 12(2):369-86. PubMed ID: 12755088
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Constitutional persons: an exchange on abortion.
    Schlueter N; Bork RH
    First Things; 2003 Jan; (129):28-36. PubMed ID: 12731559
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The United States Supreme Court interpretation of admissibility of criminal confessions.
    FUQUA EE
    J Crim Law Criminol (1931); 1945; 36():222-6. PubMed ID: 21004666
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.