419 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12729085)
1. Microleakage in ceramic inlays luted with different resin cements.
Mota CS; Demarco FF; Camacho GB; Powers JM
J Adhes Dent; 2003; 5(1):63-70. PubMed ID: 12729085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Microleakage of ceramic inlays luted with different resin cements and dentin adhesives.
Uludag B; Ozturk O; Ozturk AN
J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Oct; 102(4):235-41. PubMed ID: 19782826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Microleakage of inlay ceramic systems luted with self-adhesive resin cements.
Uludag B; Yucedag E; Sahin V
J Adhes Dent; 2014 Dec; 16(6):523-9. PubMed ID: 25264550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Tensile bond strength and flexural modulus of resin cements--influence on the fracture resistance of teeth restored with ceramic inlays.
Habekost Lde V; Camacho GB; Demarco FF; Powers JM
Oper Dent; 2007; 32(5):488-95. PubMed ID: 17910226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Pressable feldspathic inlays in premolars: effect of cementation strategy and mechanical cycling on the adhesive bond between dentin and restoration.
Feitosa SA; Corazza PH; Cesar PF; Bottino MA; Valandro LF
J Adhes Dent; 2014 Apr; 16(2):147-54. PubMed ID: 24027771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of microleakage of three acid-base luting cements versus one resin-bonded cement for Class V direct composite inlays.
Piemjai M; Miyasaka K; Iwasaki Y; Nakabayashi N
J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Dec; 88(6):598-603. PubMed ID: 12488852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Marginal leakage of filled dentin adhesives used with wet and dry bonding techniques.
Santini A; Plasschaert AJ; Mitchell S
Am J Dent; 2000 Apr; 13(2):93-7. PubMed ID: 11764834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Adhesion of indirect MOD resin composite inlays luted with self-adhesive and self-etching resin cements.
Inukai T; Abe T; Ito Y; Pilecki P; Wilson RF; Watson TF; Foxton RM
Oper Dent; 2012; 37(5):474-84. PubMed ID: 22360367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Influence of the internal conditioning of indirect restorations of resin composite in relation to microleakage using LEDs and QTH units.
Calabrez-Filho S; Calabrez VC; Reston EG; de Andrade MF; Borges LH
Oper Dent; 2009; 34(3):293-8. PubMed ID: 19544818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Fatigue load of teeth restored with bonded direct composite and indirect ceramic inlays in MOD class II cavity preparations.
Shor A; Nicholls JI; Phillips KM; Libman WJ
Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(1):64-9. PubMed ID: 12675458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Shear bond strength between feldspathic CAD/CAM ceramic and human dentine for two adhesive cements.
Graiff L; Piovan C; Vigolo P; Mason PN
J Prosthodont; 2008 Jun; 17(4):294-9. PubMed ID: 18266655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of composite resin placement techniques on the microleakage of two self-etching dentin-bonding agents.
Santini A; Plasschaert AJ; Mitchell S
Am J Dent; 2001 Jun; 14(3):132-6. PubMed ID: 11572288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Influence of different restorative techniques on marginal seal of class II composite restorations.
Rodrigues Junior SA; Pin LF; Machado G; Della Bona A; Demarco FF
J Appl Oral Sci; 2010; 18(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 20379680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Microleakage of tetric ceram/excite and Ariston pHc/Ariston liner.
Santini A; Plasschaert AJ; Mitchell S
Am J Dent; 2001 Oct; 14(5):309-13. PubMed ID: 11803996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Influence of resin cement viscosity on microleakage of ceramic inlays.
Hahn P; Attin T; Gröfke M; Hellwig E
Dent Mater; 2001 May; 17(3):191-6. PubMed ID: 11257290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Microleakage in bonded amalgam restorations using different adhesive materials.
Cenci MS; Piva E; Potrich F; Formolo E; Demarco FF; Powers JM
Braz Dent J; 2004; 15(1):13-8. PubMed ID: 15322639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Analysis of marginal adaptation and sealing to enamel and dentin of four self-adhesive resin cements.
Aschenbrenner CM; Lang R; Handel G; Behr M
Clin Oral Investig; 2012 Feb; 16(1):191-200. PubMed ID: 21327799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The effect of occlusal loading on the microleakage of class V restorations.
Arisu HD; Uçtasli MB; Eligüzeloglu E; Ozcan S; Omürlü H
Oper Dent; 2008; 33(2):135-41. PubMed ID: 18435186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. In vitro comparison of microleakage of posterior resin composites with and without liner using two-step etch-and-rinse and self-etch dentin adhesive systems.
Kasraei S; Azarsina M; Majidi S
Oper Dent; 2011; 36(2):213-21. PubMed ID: 21702678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Adaptability and microleakage of indirect resin inlays: an in vivo investigation.
Ferrari M; Mason PN
Quintessence Int; 1993 Dec; 24(12):861-5. PubMed ID: 20830881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
