These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

258 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12729430)

  • 1. Training and competency evaluation for interpretation of 12-lead electrocardiograms: recommendations from the American College of Physicians.
    Salerno SM; Alguire PC; Waxman HS;
    Ann Intern Med; 2003 May; 138(9):747-50. PubMed ID: 12729430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Competency in interpretation of 12-lead electrocardiograms: a summary and appraisal of published evidence.
    Salerno SM; Alguire PC; Waxman HS
    Ann Intern Med; 2003 May; 138(9):751-60. PubMed ID: 12729431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The emergency department versus the computer: which is the better electrocardiographer?
    Snyder CS; Fenrich AL; Friedman RA; Macias C; O'Reilly K; Kertesz NJ
    Pediatr Cardiol; 2003; 24(4):364-8. PubMed ID: 12457259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Do Medical Practitioners Trust Automated Interpretation of Electrocardiograms?
    Delrot C; Bouzillé G; Calafiore M; Rochoy M; Legrand B; Ficheur G; Chazard E
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2019 Aug; 264():536-540. PubMed ID: 31437981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Does a computer-based ECG-recorder interpret electrocardiograms more efficiently than physicians?
    Jakobsson A; Ohlin P; Pahlm O
    Clin Physiol; 1985 Oct; 5(5):417-23. PubMed ID: 3902333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Electrocardiographic interpretation skills of cardiology residents: are they competent?
    Sibbald M; Davies EG; Dorian P; Yu EH
    Can J Cardiol; 2014 Dec; 30(12):1721-4. PubMed ID: 25475474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A Novel Tool for Assessment of Emergency Medicine Resident Skill in Determining Diagnosis and Management for Emergent Electrocardiograms: A Multicenter Study.
    Hartman ND; Wheaton NB; Williamson K; Quattromani EN; Branzetti JB; Aldeen AZ
    J Emerg Med; 2016 Dec; 51(6):697-704. PubMed ID: 27618476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Safety of Computer Interpretation of Normal Triage Electrocardiograms.
    Hughes KE; Lewis SM; Katz L; Jones J
    Acad Emerg Med; 2017 Jan; 24(1):120-124. PubMed ID: 27519772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Accuracy of electrocardiogram interpretation by cardiologists in the setting of incorrect computer analysis.
    Anh D; Krishnan S; Bogun F
    J Electrocardiol; 2006 Jul; 39(3):343-5. PubMed ID: 16777525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Proposed In-Training Electrocardiogram Interpretation Competencies for Undergraduate and Postgraduate Trainees.
    Antiperovitch P; Zareba W; Steinberg JS; Bacharova L; Tereshchenko LG; Farre J; Nikus K; Ikeda T; Baranchuk A
    J Hosp Med; 2018 Mar; 13(3):185-193. PubMed ID: 29154379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Electrocardiogram interpretation training and competency assessment in emergency medicine residency programs.
    Pines JM; Perina DG; Brady WJ
    Acad Emerg Med; 2004 Sep; 11(9):982-4. PubMed ID: 15347552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Accuracy of ECG interpretation in competitive athletes: the impact of using standised ECG criteria.
    Drezner JA; Asif IM; Owens DS; Prutkin JM; Salerno JC; Fean R; Rao AL; Stout K; Harmon KG
    Br J Sports Med; 2012 Apr; 46(5):335-40. PubMed ID: 22310648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Emergency physician accuracy in interpreting electrocardiograms with potential ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: Is it enough?
    Veronese G; Germini F; Ingrassia S; Cutuli O; Donati V; Bonacchini L; Marcucci M; Fabbri A;
    Acute Card Care; 2016 Mar; 18(1):7-10. PubMed ID: 27759433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of emergency medicine residents competencies in electrocardiogram interpretation.
    Talebian MT; Zamani MM; Toliat A; Ghasemzadeh R; Saeedi M; Momeni M; Nejati A
    Acta Med Iran; 2014; 52(11):848-54. PubMed ID: 25415819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Employment of intra-individual variability to improve computerized ECG interpretation.
    Schijvenaars BJ; Kors JA; van Herpen G; van Bemmel JH
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2001; 84(Pt 1):513-7. PubMed ID: 11604793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Emergent cardiac outcomes in patients with normal electrocardiograms in the emergency department.
    Winters LJ; Dhillon RK; Pannu GK; Terrassa P; Holmes JF; Bing ML
    Am J Emerg Med; 2022 Jan; 51():384-387. PubMed ID: 34823195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Implementation of a longitudinal, near-peer ECG didactic curriculum in an internal medicine residency program and impact on ECG interpretation skills.
    Kaye MG; Khan HA; Gudleski GD; Yatsynovich Y; Graham SP; Kwiatkowski AV
    BMC Med Educ; 2023 Jul; 23(1):526. PubMed ID: 37488502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A computer-human interaction model to improve the diagnostic accuracy and clinical decision-making during 12-lead electrocardiogram interpretation.
    Cairns AW; Bond RR; Finlay DD; Breen C; Guldenring D; Gaffney R; Gallagher AG; Peace AJ; Henn P
    J Biomed Inform; 2016 Dec; 64():93-107. PubMed ID: 27687552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Competency in electrocardiogram interpretation among graduating medical students.
    Jablonover RS; Lundberg E; Zhang Y; Stagnaro-Green A
    Teach Learn Med; 2014; 26(3):279-84. PubMed ID: 25010240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of electrocardiogram interpretations by family physicians, a computer, and a cardiology service.
    Woolley D; Henck M; Luck J
    J Fam Pract; 1992 Apr; 34(4):428-32. PubMed ID: 1556536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.