These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

258 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12729430)

  • 41. Impact of a clinical scenario on accuracy of electrocardiogram interpretation.
    Hatala R; Norman GR; Brooks LR
    J Gen Intern Med; 1999 Feb; 14(2):126-9. PubMed ID: 10051784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Emergency department interpretation of electrocardiograms.
    Westdrop EJ; Gratton MC; Watson WA
    Ann Emerg Med; 1992 May; 21(5):541-4. PubMed ID: 1570910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Competency in electrocardiogram interpretation among internal medicine and emergency medicine residents.
    Berger JS; Eisen L; Nozad V; D'Angelo J; Calderon Y; Brown DL; Schweitzer P
    Am J Med; 2005 Aug; 118(8):873-80. PubMed ID: 16084180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Inter-Rater Reliability and Downstream Financial Implications of Electrocardiography Screening in Young Athletes.
    Dhutia H; Malhotra A; Yeo TJ; Ster IC; Gabus V; Steriotis A; Dores H; Mellor G; García-Corrales C; Ensam B; Jayalapan V; Ezzat VA; Finocchiaro G; Gati S; Papadakis M; Tome-Esteban M; Sharma S
    Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes; 2017 Aug; 10(8):e003306. PubMed ID: 28808091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Accuracy in interpreting the paediatric ECG: a UK-wide study and the need for improvement.
    Jheeta JS; Narayan O; Krasemann T
    Arch Dis Child; 2014 Jul; 99(7):646-8. PubMed ID: 24625668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Automated serial ECG comparison improves computerized interpretation of 12-lead ECG.
    Gregg RE; Deluca DC; Chien CH; Helfenbein ED; Ariet M
    J Electrocardiol; 2012; 45(6):561-5. PubMed ID: 22995382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Assessing computerized eye tracking technology for gaining insight into expert interpretation of the 12-lead electrocardiogram: an objective quantitative approach.
    Bond RR; Zhu T; Finlay DD; Drew B; Kligfield PD; Guldenring D; Breen C; Gallagher AG; Daly MJ; Clifford GD
    J Electrocardiol; 2014; 47(6):895-906. PubMed ID: 25110276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Errors in the computerized electrocardiogram interpretation of cardiac rhythm.
    Shah AP; Rubin SA
    J Electrocardiol; 2007; 40(5):385-90. PubMed ID: 17531257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Residents feel unprepared and unsupervised as leaders of cardiac arrest teams in teaching hospitals: a survey of internal medicine residents.
    Hayes CW; Rhee A; Detsky ME; Leblanc VR; Wax RS
    Crit Care Med; 2007 Jul; 35(7):1668-72. PubMed ID: 17507825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Reliability and validity of clinician ECG interpretation for athletes.
    Magee C; Kazman J; Haigney M; Oriscello R; DeZee KJ; Deuster P; Depenbrock P; O'Connor FG
    Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol; 2014 Jul; 19(4):319-29. PubMed ID: 24520825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Can pediatric residents interpret electrocardiograms?
    Snyder CS; Bricker JT; Fenrich AL; Friedman RA; Rosenthal GL; Johnsrude CL; Kertesz C; Kertesz NJ
    Pediatr Cardiol; 2005; 26(4):396-9. PubMed ID: 16374689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Common errors in computer electrocardiogram interpretation.
    Guglin ME; Thatai D
    Int J Cardiol; 2006 Jan; 106(2):232-7. PubMed ID: 16321696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. The Comparison of Physician to Computer Interpreted Electrocardiograms on ST-elevation Myocardial Infarction Door-to-balloon Times.
    Mawri S; Michaels A; Gibbs J; Shah S; Rao S; Kugelmass A; Lingam N; Arida M; Jacobsen G; Rowlandson I; Iyer K; Khandelwal A; McCord J
    Crit Pathw Cardiol; 2016 Mar; 15(1):22-5. PubMed ID: 26881816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Decision support for the initial triage of patients with acute coronary syndromes.
    Olsson SE; Ohlsson M; Ohlin H; Dzaferagic S; Nilsson ML; Sandkull P; Edenbrandt L
    Clin Physiol Funct Imaging; 2006 May; 26(3):151-6. PubMed ID: 16640509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. The effects of computer-assisted electrocardiographic interpretation on physicians' diagnostic decisions.
    Hillson SD; Connelly DP; Liu Y
    Med Decis Making; 1995; 15(2):107-12. PubMed ID: 7783570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Data analysis of diagnostic accuracies in 12-lead electrocardiogram interpretation by junior medical fellows.
    Novotny T; Bond RR; Andrsova I; Koc L; Sisakova M; Finlay DD; Guldenring D; Spinar J; Malik M
    J Electrocardiol; 2015; 48(6):988-94. PubMed ID: 26381796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. The diagnostic performance of computer programs for the interpretation of electrocardiograms.
    Willems JL; Abreu-Lima C; Arnaud P; van Bemmel JH; Brohet C; Degani R; Denis B; Gehring J; Graham I; van Herpen G
    N Engl J Med; 1991 Dec; 325(25):1767-73. PubMed ID: 1834940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Standardised criteria improve accuracy of ECG interpretation in competitive athletes: a randomised controlled trial.
    Exeter DJ; Elley CR; Fulcher ML; Lee AC; Drezner JA; Asif IM
    Br J Sports Med; 2014 Aug; 48(15):1167-71. PubMed ID: 24659510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. A standardized examination in the interpretation of electrocardiograms.
    Hancock EW; Norcini JJ; Webster GD
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1987 Oct; 10(4):882-6. PubMed ID: 3655152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. [Interpretation of electrocardiograms--a blinded controlled study].
    Bisgaard T; Riahi S
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2008 Dec; 170(51):4230-3. PubMed ID: 19128556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.