137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1273008)
1. [Spontaneous intrauterine rupture of contraceptive Lippes loop].
Krzaklewski S; Mazurek S; Reszczyński A
Polim Med; 1976; 6(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 1273008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Contraception with the Lippes Loop D with or without contraceptive foam (author's transl)].
van der Pas H; Thiery M
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1977 Jul; 37(7):622-4. PubMed ID: 885335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Contraceptive effectiveness of immediate compared with delayed insertion of intrauterine devices after abortion: a decision analysis.
Reeves MF; Smith KJ; Creinin MD
Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Jun; 109(6):1286-94. PubMed ID: 17540799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Evaluation from various viewpoints of the Lippes Loop, Multiload Cu 250 and Nova T].
Bilgin S; Deger S; Ariduru F
Zentralbl Gynakol; 1988; 110(14):893-8. PubMed ID: 3176743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [The end of IUD marketing in the United States: what does it mean for American women?].
Forrest JD
Contracept Fertil Sex (Paris); 1987 Mar; 15(3):291-300. PubMed ID: 12341479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [The diagnosis and removal of obscure intrauterine devices (author's transl)].
Neubüser D; Vahrson H
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1977 Mar; 37(3):227-31. PubMed ID: 870384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Advantages and disadvantages of IUD insertion immediately after abortion].
Matrljan I; Randić L
Jugosl Ginekol Opstet; 1982; 22(1-2):43-5. PubMed ID: 7132427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. IUD insertion following termination of pregnancy: a clinical trial of the TCu 220C, Lippes loop D, and copper 7.
Stud Fam Plann; 1983 Apr; 14(4):99-108. PubMed ID: 6351364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Intrauterine devices: an effective alternative to oral hormonal contraception.
Prescrire Int; 2009 Jun; 18(101):125-30. PubMed ID: 19637436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Postpartum insertion of modified intrauterine devices.
Cole LP; Edelman DA; Potts DM; Wheeler RG; Laufe LE
J Reprod Med; 1984 Sep; 29(9):677-82. PubMed ID: 6387112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A randomized comparison of the Ypsilon-Y and Lippes loop D intrauterine devices in parous women.
Brenner PF; Roy S; Mishell DR
Obstet Gynecol; 1978 Mar; 51(3):327-9. PubMed ID: 628535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Application of intrauterine devices preceded by measurement of the endometrial cavity using a Hollister sound].
Reynoso Ron L; Lozano Balderas M; Lara Ricalde R; Flores Velez A; Aznar Ramos R
Ginecol Obstet Mex; 1982 Feb; 50(298):21-4. PubMed ID: 7129181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Postplacental application of 5 different types of intrauterine devices].
Reynoso L; Arevalo N; Lara R; Aznar R
Ginecol Obstet Mex; 1982 May; 50(301):107-10. PubMed ID: 7182224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Analysis of 52 pregnancies with intrauterine devices].
Olivas Mendoza G; Hernández JG; Noriega Prieto JS; Castro Velarde RI; Thomas Del Río G; Inda Silva A
Ginecol Obstet Mex; 1981 Apr; 49(294):255-62. PubMed ID: 7327423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Letter: Intrauterine contraceptive devices.
Watson DS
Med J Aust; 1974 May; 1(20):811. PubMed ID: 4852831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Postabortion intrauterine device].
Morales Lepe C; Alpízar Espejel S; Cordero Jaimes MA; Ferrer Sierra P; Scárpita A
Ginecol Obstet Mex; 1978 Jun; 43(260):429-32. PubMed ID: 689435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Intrauterine contraception by plastic intrauterine devices (2 personal cases of failure)].
Notter A; Moulin R; Grammont P
Lyon Med; 1968 Feb; 219(7):477-83 passim. PubMed ID: 5746678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of the Lippes Loop D and tapered Lippes Loop D intrauterine devices.
Behlilovic B; Etman S; Laufe LE; Dixon B
Contraception; 1982 Mar; 25(3):293-8. PubMed ID: 7075196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Pelvic inflammation and the intrauterine contraceptive device.
Elstein M; Birnberg C; Mills W; Eckstein P
Proc R Soc Med; 1967 Apr; 60(4):397-8. PubMed ID: 6067057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Efficiency and acceptability of intrauterine contraceptive devices.
Trutko NS
Acta Med Hung; 1986; 43(2):103-8. PubMed ID: 3588154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
