These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

86 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12730777)

  • 21. Cross calibration of Hologic QDR2000 and GE Lunar Prodigy for forearm bone mineral density measurements.
    Pearson D; Horton B; Green DJ
    J Clin Densitom; 2007; 10(3):306-11. PubMed ID: 17584510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A comparison of phantoms for cross-calibration of lumbar spine DXA.
    Pearson D; Cawte SA; Green DJ
    Osteoporos Int; 2002 Dec; 13(12):948-54. PubMed ID: 12459937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. An unexpected change in DXA calibration not detected by routine quality control checks.
    Blake GM; Preston NG; Patel R; Herd RJ; Fogelman I
    Osteoporos Int; 1999; 9(2):115-20. PubMed ID: 10367037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Technical considerations of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry-based bone mineral measurements for pediatric studies.
    Koo WW; Walters J; Bush AJ
    J Bone Miner Res; 1995 Dec; 10(12):1998-2004. PubMed ID: 8619381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comparison of two Hologic DXA systems (QDR 1000 and QDR 4500/A).
    Barthe N; Braillon P; Ducassou D; Basse-Cathalinat B
    Br J Radiol; 1997 Jul; 70(835):728-39. PubMed ID: 9245885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Cross-calibration of iDXA and Prodigy on spine and femur scans in Korean adults.
    Choi YJ; Lee BJ; Lim HC; Chung YS
    J Clin Densitom; 2009; 12(4):450-5. PubMed ID: 19815436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Universal standardization for dual x-ray absorptiometry: patient and phantom cross-calibration results.
    Genant HK; Grampp S; Glüer CC; Faulkner KG; Jergas M; Engelke K; Hagiwara S; Van Kuijk C
    J Bone Miner Res; 1994 Oct; 9(10):1503-14. PubMed ID: 7817795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. In vivo and in vitro comparison of densitometers in the NOREPOS study.
    Omsland TK; Emaus N; Gjesdal CG; Falch JA; Tell GS; Forsen L; Berntsen GK; Meyer HE
    J Clin Densitom; 2008; 11(2):276-82. PubMed ID: 18158262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Replacing DXA scanners: cross-calibration with phantoms may be misleading.
    Blake GM
    Calcif Tissue Int; 1996 Jul; 59(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 8661987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Vertebral morphometry by DXA: a comparison of supine lateral and decubitus lateral densitometers.
    Pearson D; Horton B; Green DJ; Hosking DJ; Goodby A; Steel SA
    J Clin Densitom; 2006; 9(3):295-301. PubMed ID: 16931347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Accuracy and precision of 62 bone densitometers using a European Spine Phantom.
    Kolta S; Ravaud P; Fechtenbaum J; Dougados M; Roux C
    Osteoporos Int; 1999; 10(1):14-9. PubMed ID: 10501774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Cross-calibration, precision and patient dose measurements in preparation for clinical trials using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry of the lumbar spine.
    Cawte SA; Pearson D; Green DJ; Maslanka WB; Miller CG; Rogers AT
    Br J Radiol; 1999 Apr; 72(856):354-62. PubMed ID: 10474496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Anomalies in dual energy X-ray absorptiometry measurements of total-body bone mineral during weight change using Lunar, Hologic and Norland instruments.
    Tothill P; Laskey MA; Orphanidou CI; van Wijk M
    Br J Radiol; 1999 Jul; 72(859):661-9. PubMed ID: 10624323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Measurement of spinal bone mineral density on a Hologic Discovery DXA scanner with and without leg elevation.
    Lekamwasam S; Rodrigo M; Arachchi WK; Munidasa D
    J Clin Densitom; 2007; 10(2):170-3. PubMed ID: 17485034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Inaccuracies inherent in patient-specific dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry bone mineral density measurements: comprehensive phantom-based evaluation.
    Bolotin HH; Sievänen H; Grashuis JL; Kuiper JW; Järvinen TL
    J Bone Miner Res; 2001 Feb; 16(2):417-26. PubMed ID: 11204442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Variations in diagnostic performances of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in the northwest of The Netherlands.
    Staal KP; Roos JC; Manoliu RA; Kostense PJ; Lips P;
    Osteoporos Int; 2004 Apr; 15(4):335-44. PubMed ID: 14628109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A preliminary evaluation of the lunar expert-XL for bone densitometry and vertebral morphometry.
    Lang T; Takada M; Gee R; Wu C; Li J; Hayashi-Clark C; Schoen S; March V; Genant HK
    J Bone Miner Res; 1997 Jan; 12(1):136-43. PubMed ID: 9240736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Cross-Calibration of GE Healthcare Lunar Prodigy and iDXA Dual-Energy X-Ray Densitometers for Bone Mineral Measurements.
    Saarelainen J; Hakulinen M; Rikkonen T; Kröger H; Tuppurainen M; Koivumaa-Honkanen H; Honkanen R; Hujo M; Jurvelin JS
    J Osteoporos; 2016; 2016():1424582. PubMed ID: 27239366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Quantitative computed tomography (QCT) of the forearm using general purpose spiral whole-body CT scanners: accuracy, precision and comparison with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA).
    Engelke K; Libanati C; Liu Y; Wang H; Austin M; Fuerst T; Stampa B; Timm W; Genant HK
    Bone; 2009 Jul; 45(1):110-8. PubMed ID: 19345291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Bone mass measurement by DXA: influence of analysis procedures and interunit variation.
    Trevisan C; Gandolini GG; Sibilla P; Penotti M; Caraceni MP; Ortolani S
    J Bone Miner Res; 1992 Dec; 7(12):1373-82. PubMed ID: 1481723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.