200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12730940)
1. Orthopaedic crossfire--Stem modularity is unnecessary in revision total hip arthroplasty: in the affirmative.
Barrack RL
J Arthroplasty; 2003 Apr; 18(3 Suppl 1):98-100. PubMed ID: 12730940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Orthopaedic crossfire--Stem modularity is unnecessary in revision total hip arthroplasty: in opposition.
Cameron HU
J Arthroplasty; 2003 Apr; 18(3 Suppl 1):101-3. PubMed ID: 12730941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cementless femoral design concerns. Rationale for extensive porous coating.
Nourbash PS; Paprosky WG
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1998 Oct; (355):189-99. PubMed ID: 9917604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The use of a hydroxyapatite-coated primary stem in revision total hip arthroplasty.
Kelly SJ; Incavo SJ; Beynnon B
J Arthroplasty; 2006 Jan; 21(1):64-71. PubMed ID: 16446187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Extensively porous-coated femoral stems in revision hip arthroplasty: rationale and results.
Paprosky WG; Burnett RS
Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ); 2002 Aug; 31(8):471-4. PubMed ID: 12216970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cancellous impaction grafting in femoral revision THA.
Padgett DE; Kinkel S
Orthopedics; 2011 Sep; 34(9):e482-4. PubMed ID: 21902138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Total hip arthroplasty for primary osteoarthrosis in younger patients in the Finnish arthroplasty register. 4,661 primary replacements followed for 0-22 years.
Eskelinen A; Remes V; Helenius I; Pulkkinen P; Nevalainen J; Paavolainen P
Acta Orthop; 2005 Feb; 76(1):28-41. PubMed ID: 15788305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Influence of stem size on clinical outcome of primary total hip arthroplasty with cementless extensively porous-coated femoral components.
Engh CA; Mohan V; Nagowski JP; Sychterz Terefenko CJ; Engh CA
J Arthroplasty; 2009 Jun; 24(4):554-9. PubMed ID: 18534449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Should monobloc cemented stems be systematically revised during revision total hip arthroplasty? A prospective evaluation].
Grosjean G; Courpied JP; Moindreau M; Hunou N; Mathieu M; Hamadouche M
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2008 Nov; 94(7):670-7. PubMed ID: 18984124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Modified transfemoral approach to revision arthroplasty with uncemented modular revision stems.
Fink B; Grossmann A
Oper Orthop Traumatol; 2007 Mar; 19(1):32-55. PubMed ID: 17345026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Selection of the type in revision total hip replacement for failed hip arthroplasty].
Zhang XB; Song JH; Wang KZ
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2004 Mar; 18(2):135-7. PubMed ID: 15065415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Long-term results of the Schenker cementless femoral component].
Dzupa V; Cech O; Sesták M; Klézl Z
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2004; 71(2):93-100. PubMed ID: 15151096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Total hip arthroplasty for acute femoral neck fractures using a cementless tapered femoral stem.
Klein GR; Parvizi J; Vegari DN; Rothman RH; Purtill JJ
J Arthroplasty; 2006 Dec; 21(8):1134-40. PubMed ID: 17162172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Revision hip arthroplasty using strut allografts and fully porous-coated stems.
Kim YH; Kim JS
J Arthroplasty; 2005 Jun; 20(4):454-9. PubMed ID: 16124960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cementless S-ROM femoral component: effect of stem length on stability after extended proximal femoral osteotomy.
Bhagia UT; Corpe RS; Steflik DE; Young TR; Schnars J
J South Orthop Assoc; 2001; 10(1):6-11. PubMed ID: 12132846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Revision total hip arthroplasty: the limits of fully coated stems.
Sporer SM; Paprosky WG
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2003 Dec; (417):203-9. PubMed ID: 14646718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cementless modular hip revision arthroplasty using the MRP Titan Revision Stem: outcome of 79 hips after an average of 4 years' follow-up.
Schuh A; Werber S; Holzwarth U; Zeiler G
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2004 Jun; 124(5):306-9. PubMed ID: 15064958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A critical look at cementless stems. Taper designs and when to use alternatives.
Bourne RB; Rorabeck CH
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1998 Oct; (355):212-23. PubMed ID: 9917606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Revision hip arthroplasty with the cementless prosthesis: 4 years follow-up study].
Kou BL; Lin JH; Guan ZP; Sun TZ; Wei W; Li H; Lü HS
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2005 Apr; 43(8):499-501. PubMed ID: 15938905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Extensively porous-coated stems for femoral revision: a choice for all seasons.
Hamilton WG; Cashen DV; Ho H; Hopper RH; Engh CA
J Arthroplasty; 2007 Jun; 22(4 Suppl 1):106-10. PubMed ID: 17570290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
