196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12731497)
1. Potential research subject complains about the violation of her privacy.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2002 Oct; 17(10):6-7. PubMed ID: 12731497
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Institutional review boards and the privacy of human research subjects.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2002 Aug; 17(8):1-2. PubMed ID: 12731492
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The use and disclosure of protected health information for research under the HIPAA privacy rule: unrealized patient autonomy and burdensome government regulation.
Tovino SA
S D Law Rev; 2004; 49(3):447-502. PubMed ID: 16493842
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Institutional review boards and the new privacy rule.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2001 Sep; 16(9):1-3. PubMed ID: 11833565
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Privacy bill under fire from researchers.
Wadman M
Nature; 1998 Mar; 392(6671):6. PubMed ID: 9510231
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. New privacy rule has more tasks for IRBs.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2001 Feb; 16(2):4. PubMed ID: 12530379
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. HIPAA and what institutional review boards (IRBs) do not have to review.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2003 Dec; 18(12):1-2. PubMed ID: 15027429
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. So what are we going to do about research using clinical information and samples?
Clayton EW
IRB; 2004; 26(6):14-5. PubMed ID: 15658018
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. University says research subjects' family members are not research subjects too.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2005 Feb; 20(2):6-7. PubMed ID: 15839006
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Medical privacy and medical research.
Rosenfeld CR
N Engl J Med; 2002 May; 346(21):1674. PubMed ID: 12024008
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Confidentiality certificates and privacy of research subjects.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2002 May; 17(5):3. PubMed ID: 12708410
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Research firm changes subject notification procedure after complaint by potential subject.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2002 Nov; 17(11):6-7. PubMed ID: 12708413
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Regulating clinical research: informed consent, privacy, and IRBs.
Hoffman S
Cap Univ Law Rev; 2003; 31(1):71-91. PubMed ID: 15295833
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Maintaining informed consent for doctor-patient confidentiality: more serious failings in the HHS medical regulations.
Sobel R
J Biolaw Bus; 2003; 6(2):61-5. PubMed ID: 14682371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. No privacy for all? Serious failings in the HHS medical records regulations.
Sobel R
J Biolaw Bus; 2002; 5(2):45-8. PubMed ID: 12739546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Balancing privacy protections with efficient research: institutional review boards and the use of certificates of confidentiality.
Currie PM
IRB; 2005; 27(5):7-12. PubMed ID: 16425475
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Access to medical records for research purposes: varying perceptions across research ethics boards.
Willison DJ; Emerson C; Szala-Meneok KV; Gibson E; Schwartz L; Weisbaum KM; Fournier F; Brazil K; Coughlin MD
J Med Ethics; 2008 Apr; 34(4):308-14. PubMed ID: 18375687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The New Zealand Cot Death Study: some legal and ethical issues.
Mitchell EA; Hassall IB; Scragg R; Taylor BJ; Ford R; Allen EM
J Paediatr Child Health; 1992; 28 Supp 1():S17-20. PubMed ID: 11686168
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. IRB triage of projects that involve medical record review.
Amdur R; Speers MA; Bankert E
IRB; 2000 Jan; 22(1):4-7. PubMed ID: 12546009
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. New duties for the sentinels.
Palca J
Hastings Cent Rep; 1994; 24(5):2. PubMed ID: 8002302
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
