These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

352 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12731553)

  • 1. Parpalaix v. CECOS: Protecting Intent in Reproductive Technology.
    Katz GA
    Harv J Law Technol; 1998; 11(3):683-98. PubMed ID: 12731553
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Fathering a child from the grave: what are the inheritance rights of children born through new technology after the death of a parent?
    VanCannon K
    Drake Law Rev; 2004; 52(2):331-62. PubMed ID: 16755696
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A primer on posthumous conception and related issues of assisted reproduction.
    Brenwald ML; Redeker K
    Washburn Law J; 1999; 38(2):599-654. PubMed ID: 12774811
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cryopreserved embryos: a response to "forced parenthood" and the role of intent.
    Apel SB
    Fam Law Q; 2005; 39(3):663-81. PubMed ID: 16610152
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Confused heritage and the absurdity of genetic ownership.
    Silver LM; Silver SR
    Harv J Law Technol; 1998; 11(3):593-618. PubMed ID: 12731550
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assisted reproductive technologies: contracts, consents, and controversies.
    Elster NR
    Am J Fam Law; 2005; 18(4):193-9. PubMed ID: 17153245
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The real sexual revolution: posthumously conceived children.
    Sutton S
    St Johns Law Rev; 1999; 73(3):857-931. PubMed ID: 12449929
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Where does a man stand on issues of assisted reproduction, surrogacy, artificial insemination within lesbian relationships and posthumous conception?
    Beem P
    Aust J Fam Law; 2004 Apr; 18(1):41-62. PubMed ID: 17058336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Matters of life and death: inheritance consequences of reproductive technologies.
    Shapo HS
    Hofstra Law Rev; 1997; 25(4):1091-220. PubMed ID: 11858286
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. In re Marriage of Buzzanca: charting a new destiny.
    O'Hara MD; Vorzimer AW
    West State Univ Law Rev; 1998-1999; 26():25-45. PubMed ID: 12625315
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Fatherhood after death: a legal and ethical analysis of posthumous reproduction.
    Corvalan A
    Albany Law J Sci Technol; 1997; 7():E1-E26. PubMed ID: 16518900
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The parent trap: uncovering the myth of "coerced parenthood" in frozen embryo disputes.
    Waldman E
    Am Univ Law Rev; 2004 Jun; 53(5):1021-62. PubMed ID: 15529471
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Conundrums with penumbras: the right to privacy encompasses non-gamete providers who create preembryos with the intent to become parents.
    Dillon LM
    Wash Law Rev; 2003 May; 78(2):625-51. PubMed ID: 15378817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Property, progeny, body part: assisted reproduction and the transfer of wealth.
    Guzman KR
    Univ Calif Davis Law Rev; 1997; 31(1):193-252. PubMed ID: 11833603
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Ethical dilemmas in reproductive medicine.
    Paine SJ; Moore PK; Hill DL
    Whittier Law Rev; 1996; 18(1):51-66. PubMed ID: 16273701
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An analytical framework for resolving the issues raised by the interaction between reproductive technology and the law of inheritance.
    Bailey JE
    De Paul Law Rev; 1998; 47(4):743-818. PubMed ID: 12173632
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Frozen embryos: towards an equitable solution.
    Trespalacios MJ
    Univ Miami Law Rev; 1992 Jan; 46(3):803-34. PubMed ID: 16047447
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. In vitro fertilization and consent agreements: where does California stand?
    Ellis M
    Santa Clara Law Rev; 2002; 42(4):1191-225. PubMed ID: 15212074
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Growing pains: disputes surrounding human reproductive interests stretch the boundaries of traditional legal concepts.
    Triber GA
    Seton Hall Legis J; 1998; 23(1):103-40. PubMed ID: 12755156
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Moore 10 years later--still trying to fill the gap: creating a personal property right in genetic material.
    Seeney EB
    New Engl Law Rev; 1998; 32(4):1131-91. PubMed ID: 12778925
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.