These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
352 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12731553)
1. Parpalaix v. CECOS: Protecting Intent in Reproductive Technology. Katz GA Harv J Law Technol; 1998; 11(3):683-98. PubMed ID: 12731553 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Fathering a child from the grave: what are the inheritance rights of children born through new technology after the death of a parent? VanCannon K Drake Law Rev; 2004; 52(2):331-62. PubMed ID: 16755696 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. A primer on posthumous conception and related issues of assisted reproduction. Brenwald ML; Redeker K Washburn Law J; 1999; 38(2):599-654. PubMed ID: 12774811 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Cryopreserved embryos: a response to "forced parenthood" and the role of intent. Apel SB Fam Law Q; 2005; 39(3):663-81. PubMed ID: 16610152 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Confused heritage and the absurdity of genetic ownership. Silver LM; Silver SR Harv J Law Technol; 1998; 11(3):593-618. PubMed ID: 12731550 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Assisted reproductive technologies: contracts, consents, and controversies. Elster NR Am J Fam Law; 2005; 18(4):193-9. PubMed ID: 17153245 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The real sexual revolution: posthumously conceived children. Sutton S St Johns Law Rev; 1999; 73(3):857-931. PubMed ID: 12449929 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Where does a man stand on issues of assisted reproduction, surrogacy, artificial insemination within lesbian relationships and posthumous conception? Beem P Aust J Fam Law; 2004 Apr; 18(1):41-62. PubMed ID: 17058336 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Matters of life and death: inheritance consequences of reproductive technologies. Shapo HS Hofstra Law Rev; 1997; 25(4):1091-220. PubMed ID: 11858286 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. In re Marriage of Buzzanca: charting a new destiny. O'Hara MD; Vorzimer AW West State Univ Law Rev; 1998-1999; 26():25-45. PubMed ID: 12625315 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Fatherhood after death: a legal and ethical analysis of posthumous reproduction. Corvalan A Albany Law J Sci Technol; 1997; 7():E1-E26. PubMed ID: 16518900 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The parent trap: uncovering the myth of "coerced parenthood" in frozen embryo disputes. Waldman E Am Univ Law Rev; 2004 Jun; 53(5):1021-62. PubMed ID: 15529471 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Conundrums with penumbras: the right to privacy encompasses non-gamete providers who create preembryos with the intent to become parents. Dillon LM Wash Law Rev; 2003 May; 78(2):625-51. PubMed ID: 15378817 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Property, progeny, body part: assisted reproduction and the transfer of wealth. Guzman KR Univ Calif Davis Law Rev; 1997; 31(1):193-252. PubMed ID: 11833603 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Ethical dilemmas in reproductive medicine. Paine SJ; Moore PK; Hill DL Whittier Law Rev; 1996; 18(1):51-66. PubMed ID: 16273701 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. An analytical framework for resolving the issues raised by the interaction between reproductive technology and the law of inheritance. Bailey JE De Paul Law Rev; 1998; 47(4):743-818. PubMed ID: 12173632 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Frozen embryos: towards an equitable solution. Trespalacios MJ Univ Miami Law Rev; 1992 Jan; 46(3):803-34. PubMed ID: 16047447 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. In vitro fertilization and consent agreements: where does California stand? Ellis M Santa Clara Law Rev; 2002; 42(4):1191-225. PubMed ID: 15212074 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Growing pains: disputes surrounding human reproductive interests stretch the boundaries of traditional legal concepts. Triber GA Seton Hall Legis J; 1998; 23(1):103-40. PubMed ID: 12755156 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Moore 10 years later--still trying to fill the gap: creating a personal property right in genetic material. Seeney EB New Engl Law Rev; 1998; 32(4):1131-91. PubMed ID: 12778925 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]