These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12731828)

  • 1. Making decisions about hazardous waste remediation when even considering a remediation technology is controversial.
    Wolfe AK; Bjornstad DJ; Kerchner ND
    Environ Sci Technol; 2003 Apr; 37(8):1485-92. PubMed ID: 12731828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A technicoeconomic approach for the selection of a site remediation strategy--part B: model application.
    Bage GF; Samson R; Sinclair-Desgagné B
    Environ Manage; 2003 Jan; 31(1):69-78. PubMed ID: 12447576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A technicoeconomic approach for the selection of a site remediation strategy--part A: theory.
    Bage GF; Samson R; Sinclair-Desgagné B
    Environ Manage; 2002 Dec; 30(6):807-15. PubMed ID: 12402096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Innovative technologies for contaminated site remediation: focus on bioremediation.
    Gabriel PF
    J Air Waste Manage Assoc; 1991 Dec; 41(12):1657-60. PubMed ID: 1799447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Application of risk assessment and decision analysis to the evaluation, ranking and selection of environmental remediation alternatives.
    Bonano EJ; Apostolakis GE; Salter PF; Ghassemi A; Jennings S
    J Hazard Mater; 2000 Jan; 71(1-3):35-57. PubMed ID: 10677653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Testing alternative decision approaches for identifying cleanup priorities at contaminated sites.
    Arvai J; Gregory R
    Environ Sci Technol; 2003 Apr; 37(8):1469-76. PubMed ID: 12731826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A template of information needs for decision-making about delaying remediation on contaminated lands to protect human health.
    Burger J; Gochfeld M
    J Toxicol Environ Health A; 2020 May; 83(10):379-394. PubMed ID: 32501180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Public reaction to toxic waste contamination: analysis of a social movement.
    Masterson-Allen S; Brown P
    Int J Health Serv; 1990; 20(3):485-500. PubMed ID: 2384288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An evaluation of the role of risk-based decision-making in a former manufactured gas plant site remediation.
    Vyas VM; Gochfeld MG; Georgopoulos PG; Lioy PJ; Sussman NR
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2006 Feb; 56(2):225-35. PubMed ID: 16570377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An overview and analysis of site remediation technologies.
    Khan FI; Husain T; Hejazi R
    J Environ Manage; 2004 Jun; 71(2):95-122. PubMed ID: 15135946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Managing uncertainty in environmental decisions.
    Crumbling DM; Groenjes C; Lesnik B; Lynch K; Shockley J; van Ee J; Howe R; Keith L; McKenna J
    Environ Sci Technol; 2001 Oct; 35(19):404A-409A. PubMed ID: 11642468
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Technological innovation in hazardous waste remediation.
    Kovalick WW; Cummings JB
    J Air Waste Manage Assoc; 1991 Mar; 41(3):347-9. PubMed ID: 2059423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Application of the analytic hierarchy process to compare alternatives for the long-term management of surplus mercury.
    Randall P; Brown L; Deschaine L; Dimarzio J; Kaiser G; Vierow J
    J Environ Manage; 2004 May; 71(1):35-43. PubMed ID: 15084358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Using integrated geospatial mapping and conceptual site models to guide risk-based environmental clean-up decisions.
    Mayer HJ; Greenberg MR; Burger J; Gochfield M; Powers C; Kosson D; Keren R; Danis C; Vyas V
    Risk Anal; 2005 Apr; 25(2):429-46. PubMed ID: 15876215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Remediation of contaminated lands: a decision methodology for site owners.
    Tam EK; Byer PH
    J Environ Manage; 2002 Apr; 64(4):387-400. PubMed ID: 12141159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An integrated subsurface modeling and risk assessment approach for managing the petroleum-contaminated sites.
    Liu L; Huang GH; Hao RX; Cheng SY
    J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng; 2004; 39(11-12):3083-113. PubMed ID: 15533023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Moving further upstream: from toxics reduction to the precautionary principle.
    Mayer B; Brown P; Linder M
    Public Health Rep; 2002; 117(6):574-86. PubMed ID: 12576537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Applicability of risk-based management and the need for risk-based economic decision analysis at hazardous waste contaminated sites.
    Khadam I; Kaluarachchi JJ
    Environ Int; 2003 Jul; 29(4):503-19. PubMed ID: 12705948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Shifting priorities at the Department of Energy's bomb factories: protecting human and ecological health.
    Burger J; Leschine TM; Greenberg M; Karr JR; Gochfeld M; Powers CW
    Environ Manage; 2003 Feb; 31(2):157-67. PubMed ID: 12520373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A proactive approach can make site remediation less expensive.
    Bage GF; Samson R; Sinclair-Desgagné B
    Environ Manage; 2004 Oct; 34(4):449-60. PubMed ID: 15633039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.