These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
237 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12732417)
1. Evaluation of QIAamp DNA Stool Mini Kit for ecological studies of gut microbiota. Li M; Gong J; Cottrill M; Yu H; de Lange C; Burton J; Topp E J Microbiol Methods; 2003 Jul; 54(1):13-20. PubMed ID: 12732417 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Microbial diversity in fecal samples depends on DNA extraction method: easyMag DNA extraction compared to QIAamp DNA stool mini kit extraction. Mirsepasi H; Persson S; Struve C; Andersen LO; Petersen AM; Krogfelt KA BMC Res Notes; 2014 Jan; 7():50. PubMed ID: 24447346 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of DNA extraction kits for PCR-DGGE analysis of human intestinal microbial communities from fecal specimens. Ariefdjohan MW; Savaiano DA; Nakatsu CH Nutr J; 2010 May; 9():23. PubMed ID: 20492702 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of fecal DNA extraction protocols for human gut microbiome studies. Lim MY; Park YS; Kim JH; Nam YD BMC Microbiol; 2020 Jul; 20(1):212. PubMed ID: 32680572 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of DNA extraction methods for human gut microbial community profiling. Lim MY; Song EJ; Kim SH; Lee J; Nam YD Syst Appl Microbiol; 2018 Mar; 41(2):151-157. PubMed ID: 29305057 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparison of the efficiency of five different commercial DNA extraction kits for extraction of DNA from faecal samples. Claassen S; du Toit E; Kaba M; Moodley C; Zar HJ; Nicol MP J Microbiol Methods; 2013 Aug; 94(2):103-110. PubMed ID: 23684993 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Application of denaturant gradient gel electrophoresis for the analysis of the porcine gastrointestinal microbiota. Simpson JM; McCracken VJ; White BA; Gaskins HR; Mackie RI J Microbiol Methods; 1999 Jun; 36(3):167-79. PubMed ID: 10379803 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Monitoring of stool microbiota in subjects with diarrhea indicates distortions in composition. Mai V; Braden CR; Heckendorf J; Pironis B; Hirshon JM J Clin Microbiol; 2006 Dec; 44(12):4550-2. PubMed ID: 17021054 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Are all faecal bacteria detected with equal efficiency? A study using next-generation sequencing and quantitative culture of infants' faecal samples. Sjöberg F; Nookaew I; Yazdanshenas S; Gio-Batta M; Adlerberth I; Wold AE J Microbiol Methods; 2020 Oct; 177():106018. PubMed ID: 32795633 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparative analysis of commercially available kits for optimal DNA extraction from bovine fecal samples. Seethalakshmi PS; Kumaresan TN; Vishnu Prasad Nair RU; Prathiviraj R; Seghal Kiran G; Selvin J Arch Microbiol; 2024 Jun; 206(7):314. PubMed ID: 38900289 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of DNA extraction protocols for the analysis of gut microbiota in fishes. Larsen AM; Mohammed HH; Arias CR FEMS Microbiol Lett; 2015 Mar; 362(5):. PubMed ID: 25757730 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An effective method for isolation of DNA from pig faeces and comparison of five different methods. Tang JN; Zeng ZG; Wang HN; Yang T; Zhang PJ; Li YL; Zhang AY; Fan WQ; Zhang Y; Yang X; Zhao SJ; Tian GB; Zou LK J Microbiol Methods; 2008 Dec; 75(3):432-6. PubMed ID: 18700153 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. PCR/DGGE and 16S rRNA gene library analysis of the colonic microbiota of HLA-B27/beta2-microglobulin transgenic rats. McBurney W; Mangold M; Munro K; Schultz M; Rath HC; Tannock GW Lett Appl Microbiol; 2006 Feb; 42(2):165-71. PubMed ID: 16441383 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of commercial kits for the extraction of DNA from paddy soils. Knauth S; Schmidt H; Tippkötter R Lett Appl Microbiol; 2013 Mar; 56(3):222-8. PubMed ID: 23252687 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of commercial DNA extraction kits for isolation and purification of bacterial and eukaryotic DNA from PAH-contaminated soils. Mahmoudi N; Slater GF; Fulthorpe RR Can J Microbiol; 2011 Aug; 57(8):623-8. PubMed ID: 21815819 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Molecular monitoring and characterization of the faecal microbiota of healthy dogs during fructan supplementation. Vanhoutte T; Huys G; De Brandt E; Fahey GC; Swings J FEMS Microbiol Lett; 2005 Aug; 249(1):65-71. PubMed ID: 15979820 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Polymerase chain reaction-denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis analysis of bacterial community structure in the food, intestines, and feces of earthworms. Hong SW; Lee JS; Chung KS J Microbiol; 2011 Aug; 49(4):544-50. PubMed ID: 21887635 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of five assays for DNA extraction from bacterial cells in human faecal samples. Gryp T; Glorieux G; Joossens M; Vaneechoutte M J Appl Microbiol; 2020 Aug; 129(2):378-388. PubMed ID: 32034968 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Analysis of bacterial communities in the rhizosphere of chrysanthemum via denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis of PCR-amplified 16S rRNA as well as DNA fragments coding for 16S rRNA. Duineveld BM; Kowalchuk GA; Keijzer A; van Elsas JD; van Veen JA Appl Environ Microbiol; 2001 Jan; 67(1):172-8. PubMed ID: 11133442 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Magnetic bead-based nucleic acid purification kit: Clinical application and performance evaluation in stool specimens. Yoon JG; Kang JS; Hwang SY; Song J; Jeong SH J Microbiol Methods; 2016 May; 124():62-8. PubMed ID: 27030641 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]