BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

225 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12732750)

  • 1. Analysis of localized erythema using clinical indicators and spectroscopy.
    Sprigle S; Linden M; Riordan B
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 2003 Mar; 49(3):42-52. PubMed ID: 12732750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Skin alterations of intact skin and risk factors associated with pressure ulcer development in surgical patients: a cohort study.
    Nixon J; Cranny G; Bond S
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2007 Jul; 44(5):655-63. PubMed ID: 16631178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Testing the validity of erythema detection algorithms.
    Riordan B; Sprigle S; Linden M
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 2001; 38(1):13-22. PubMed ID: 11322466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Non-blanchable erythema as an indicator for the need for pressure ulcer prevention: a randomized-controlled trial.
    Vanderwee K; Grypdonck M; Defloor T
    J Clin Nurs; 2007 Feb; 16(2):325-35. PubMed ID: 17239068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Detection of skin erythema in darkly pigmented skin using multispectral images.
    Sprigle S; Zhang L; Duckworth M
    Adv Skin Wound Care; 2009 Apr; 22(4):172-9. PubMed ID: 19325277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Draft definition of stage I pressure ulcers: inclusion of persons with darkly pigmented skin. NPUAP Task Force on Stage I Definition and Darkly Pigmented Skin.
    Henderson CT; Ayello EA; Sussman C; Leiby DM; Bennett MA; Dungog EF; Sprigle S; Woodruff L
    Adv Wound Care; 1997 Sep; 10(5):16-9. PubMed ID: 9362572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of four non-invasive methods for examination and characterization of pressure ulcers.
    Andersen ES; Karlsmark T
    Skin Res Technol; 2008 Aug; 14(3):270-6. PubMed ID: 19159371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reliability of the European Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel classification system.
    Defloor T; Schoonhoven L; Katrien V; Weststrate J; Myny D
    J Adv Nurs; 2006 Apr; 54(2):189-98. PubMed ID: 16553705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel's updated pressure ulcer staging system.
    Black J; Baharestani M; Cuddigan J; Dorner B; Edsberg L; Langemo D; Posthauer ME; Ratliff C; Taler G;
    Urol Nurs; 2007 Apr; 27(2):144-50, 156. PubMed ID: 17494455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. EPUAP classification system for pressure ulcers: European reliability study.
    Beeckman D; Schoonhoven L; Fletcher J; Furtado K; Gunningberg L; Heyman H; Lindholm C; Paquay L; VerdĂș J; Defloor T
    J Adv Nurs; 2007 Dec; 60(6):682-91. PubMed ID: 18039255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Category I pressure ulcers: how reliable is clinical assessment?
    Sterner E; Lindholm C; Berg E; Stark A; Fossum B
    Orthop Nurs; 2011; 30(3):194-205; quiz 206-7. PubMed ID: 21597349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Subepidermal moisture differentiates erythema and stage I pressure ulcers in nursing home residents.
    Bates-Jensen BM; McCreath HE; Pongquan V; Apeles NC
    Wound Repair Regen; 2008; 16(2):189-97. PubMed ID: 18318804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Clinical skin temperature measurement to predict incipient pressure ulcers.
    Sprigle S; Linden M; McKenna D; Davis K; Riordan B
    Adv Skin Wound Care; 2001; 14(3):133-7. PubMed ID: 11905978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Prevalence of pressure ulcers in three university teaching hospitals in Ireland.
    Gallagher P; Barry P; Hartigan I; McCluskey P; O'Connor K; O'Connor M
    J Tissue Viability; 2008 Nov; 17(4):103-9. PubMed ID: 18378140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Predicting pressure ulcer risk with the modified Braden, Braden, and Norton scales in acute care hospitals in Mainland China.
    Kwong E; Pang S; Wong T; Ho J; Shao-ling X; Li-jun T
    Appl Nurs Res; 2005 May; 18(2):122-8. PubMed ID: 15991112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The reliability of two observation methods of nonblanchable erythema, Grade 1 pressure ulcer.
    Vanderwee K; Grypdonck MH; De Bacquer D; Defloor T
    Appl Nurs Res; 2006 Aug; 19(3):156-62. PubMed ID: 16877195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Contribution of skin temperature regularity to the risk of developing pressure ulcers in nursing facility residents.
    Rapp MP; Bergstrom N; Padhye NS
    Adv Skin Wound Care; 2009 Nov; 22(11):506-13. PubMed ID: 20026932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Development of a new risk assessment scale for predicting pressure ulcers in an intensive care unit.
    Suriadi ; Sanada H; Sugama J; Thigpen B; Subuh M
    Nurs Crit Care; 2008; 13(1):34-43. PubMed ID: 18226053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of two skin examination methods for grade 1 pressure ulcers.
    Kottner J; Dassen T; Lahmann N
    J Clin Nurs; 2009 Sep; 18(17):2464-9. PubMed ID: 19694878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An interrater reliability study of the assessment of pressure ulcer risk using the Braden scale and the classification of pressure ulcers in a home care setting.
    Kottner J; Halfens R; Dassen T
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2009 Oct; 46(10):1307-12. PubMed ID: 19406400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.