These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12733406)
1. Presenting a very accurate impression procedure and testing the accuracy of the impression obtained. Stern SS Dent Today; 2003 Apr; 22(4):72-7. PubMed ID: 12733406 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The effects of custom tray material on the accuracy of master casts. Shafa S; Zaree Z; Mosharraf R J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 Sep; 9(6):49-56. PubMed ID: 18784859 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Influence of impression technique and material on the accuracy of multiple implant impressions. Wöstmann B; Rehmann P; Balkenhol M Int J Prosthodont; 2008; 21(4):299-301. PubMed ID: 18717085 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of the accuracy of 3 transfer techniques for implant-supported prostheses with multiple abutments. Naconecy MM; Teixeira ER; Shinkai RS; Frasca LC; Cervieri A Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(2):192-8. PubMed ID: 15101589 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of the accuracy of implant-level impression techniques for internal-connection implant prostheses in parallel and divergent models. Choi JH; Lim YJ; Yim SH; Kim CW Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(5):761-8. PubMed ID: 17974110 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Accuracy of 2 impression techniques for ITI implants. Akça K; Cehreli MC Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(4):517-23. PubMed ID: 15346748 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Accurate impression material and technique for well-adapted restorations. Trushkowsky R Dent Today; 2007 Feb; 26(2):120, 122-3. PubMed ID: 17348280 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Accuracy of impression techniques for implants. Part 2 - comparison of splinting techniques. Filho HG; Mazaro JV; Vedovatto E; Assunção WG; dos Santos PH J Prosthodont; 2009 Feb; 18(2):172-6. PubMed ID: 19178624 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Accurate dies and well-fitting crowns using three-in-one, all-plastic impression trays. Gottlieb M Dent Econ; 1996 Jan; 86(1):102-3. PubMed ID: 8612944 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Master cast accuracy in single-tooth implant replacement cases: an in vitro comparison. A technical note. Vigolo P; Fonzi F; Majzoub Z; Cordioli G Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2005; 20(3):455-60. PubMed ID: 15973958 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An evaluation of three implant level impression techniques for single tooth implant. Daoudi MF; Setchell DJ; Searson LJ Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2004 Mar; 12(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 15058176 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The effect of selected variables on the retention of irreversible hydrocolloid impression material. Al-Athel MS J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 Sep; 9(6):57-64. PubMed ID: 18784860 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The use of a 3D laser scanner using superimpositional software to assess the accuracy of impression techniques. Shah S; Sundaram G; Bartlett D; Sherriff M J Dent; 2004 Nov; 32(8):653-8. PubMed ID: 15476960 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Interocclusal record fabricated with bis-acrylic composite resin and vinyl polysiloxane registration material. Vivas JL; Sierraalta M J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Sep; 102(3):199-200. PubMed ID: 19703631 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Using silicone impression material and acrylic resin to fabricate remount casts for removable partial dentures. Hsu YT; Farmer JB J Prosthodont; 2005 Jun; 14(2):137-40. PubMed ID: 16011626 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]