164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12734233)
1. Validation of the automated reading and incubation system with Sensititre plates for antimicrobial susceptibility testing.
Chapin KC; Musgnug MC
J Clin Microbiol; 2003 May; 41(5):1951-6. PubMed ID: 12734233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of Sensititre automated reading and incubation system for automated reading of Sensititre broth microdilution susceptibility plates.
Chapin KC; Musgnug MC
J Clin Microbiol; 2004 Feb; 42(2):909-11. PubMed ID: 14766887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Direct susceptibility testing of positive blood cultures by using Sensititre broth microdilution plates.
Chapin KC; Musgnug MC
J Clin Microbiol; 2003 Oct; 41(10):4751-4. PubMed ID: 14532215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Direct comparison of the BD phoenix system with the MicroScan WalkAway system for identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Enterobacteriaceae and nonfermentative gram-negative organisms.
Snyder JW; Munier GK; Johnson CL
J Clin Microbiol; 2008 Jul; 46(7):2327-33. PubMed ID: 18495856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Multilaboratory study of the Biomic automated well-reading instrument versus MicroScan WalkAway for reading MicroScan antimicrobial susceptibility and identification panels.
Fader RC; Weaver E; Fossett R; Toyras M; Vanderlaan J; Gibbs D; Wang A; Thierjung N
J Clin Microbiol; 2013 May; 51(5):1548-54. PubMed ID: 23486713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The MicroScan WalkAway diagnostic microbiology system--an evaluation.
McGregor A; Schio F; Beaton S; Boulton V; Perman M; Gilbert G
Pathology; 1995 Apr; 27(2):172-6. PubMed ID: 7567148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of pathogens isolated from blood culture: a performance comparison of Accelerate Pheno™ and VITEK® 2 systems with the broth microdilution method.
De Angelis G; Posteraro B; Menchinelli G; Liotti FM; Spanu T; Sanguinetti M
J Antimicrob Chemother; 2019 Jan; 74(Suppl 1):i24-i31. PubMed ID: 30690539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Manual Reading of Sensititre Broth Microdilution System Panels Improves Accuracy of Susceptibility Reporting for Polymyxin Antibiotics.
Bellerose MM; Clark AE; Youn JH; Weingarten RA; Crooks CM; Dekker JP; Frank KM
J Clin Microbiol; 2021 Aug; 59(9):e0033221. PubMed ID: 34165324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of the Merlin MICRONAUT system for rapid direct susceptibility testing of gram-positive cocci and gram-negative bacilli from positive blood cultures.
Wellinghausen N; Pietzcker T; Poppert S; Belak S; Fieser N; Bartel M; Essig A
J Clin Microbiol; 2007 Mar; 45(3):789-95. PubMed ID: 17202283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Multicenter-evaluation of optimal cell density to determine antimicrobial susceptibility for Haemophilus influenzae by the automated RAISUS system when the early-harvested bacterial cells were used].
Matsukawa Y; Miyabe T; Sawamura H; Higa M; Yamane N; Urasoko A; Endo R
Rinsho Byori; 2007 Jul; 55(7):611-8. PubMed ID: 17718056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Evaluation of the Two Commercial Methods Based on Broth Microdilution Against Reference Microdilution Method for Klebsiella pneumoniae Isolates].
Kansak N; Aslan M; Adaleti R; Aksaray S
Mikrobiyol Bul; 2020 Oct; 54(4):606-612. PubMed ID: 33107289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of three broth microdilution systems to determine colistin susceptibility of Gram-negative bacilli.
Jayol A; Nordmann P; André C; Poirel L; Dubois V
J Antimicrob Chemother; 2018 May; 73(5):1272-1278. PubMed ID: 29481600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Ability of commercial and reference antimicrobial susceptibility testing methods to detect vancomycin resistance in enterococci.
Tenover FC; Swenson JM; O'Hara CM; Stocker SA
J Clin Microbiol; 1995 Jun; 33(6):1524-7. PubMed ID: 7650179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Performance and clinical significance of direct antimicrobial susceptibility testing on urine from hospitalized patients.
Breteler KB; Rentenaar RJ; Verkaart G; Sturm PD
Scand J Infect Dis; 2011 Oct; 43(10):771-6. PubMed ID: 21696255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Diagnostic accuracy assessment of Sensititre and agar disk diffusion for determining antimicrobial resistance profiles of bovine clinical mastitis pathogens.
Saini V; Riekerink RG; McClure JT; Barkema HW
J Clin Microbiol; 2011 Apr; 49(4):1568-77. PubMed ID: 21270215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of the BD Phoenix Automated Microbiology System for identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing of common clinical isolates.
Liu ZK; Ling TK; Cheng AF
Med Princ Pract; 2005; 14(4):250-4. PubMed ID: 15961935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Ability of Latin America laboratories to detect antimicrobial resistance patterns: experience of the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program (1997-2000).
Mendes RE; Reis AO; Gales AC; Jones RN; Sader HS
Braz J Infect Dis; 2003 Oct; 7(5):282-9. PubMed ID: 14552736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Accuracy of Direct Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing of Gram-Negative Bacteria from Positive Blood Cultures Using MicroScan System and Value of Using Expert Rules for β-Lactam Agents.
Jacobs MR; Good CE; Abdelhamed AM; Bonomo RA
Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 2022 Mar; 66(3):e0214821. PubMed ID: 35099271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of the Autoscan Walkaway system for rapid identification and susceptibility testing of gram-negative bacilli.
Kelly MT; Leicester C
J Clin Microbiol; 1992 Jun; 30(6):1568-71. PubMed ID: 1624575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of MicroScan MICroSTREP, PASCO, and Sensititre MIC panels for determining antimicrobial susceptibilities of Streptococcus pneumoniae.
Guthrie LL; Banks S; Setiawan W; Waites KB
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 1999 Apr; 33(4):267-73. PubMed ID: 10212754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
