BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12734233)

  • 21. [Performance evaluation of VITEK 2 system in meropenem susceptibility testing of clinical Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates].
    Acuner IC; Bayramoğlu G; Birinci A; Cekiç Cihan C; Bek Y; Durupınar B
    Mikrobiyol Bul; 2011 Jul; 45(3):411-21. PubMed ID: 21935774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Comparison of commonly used antimicrobial susceptibility testing methods for evaluating susceptibilities of clinical isolates of Enterobacteriaceae and nonfermentative Gram-negative bacilli to cefoperazone-sulbactam.
    Jean SS; Liao CH; Sheng WH; Lee WS; Hsueh PR
    J Microbiol Immunol Infect; 2017 Aug; 50(4):454-463. PubMed ID: 26454423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Multicenter evaluation of an automated system using selected bacteria that harbor challenging and clinically relevant mechanisms of resistance to antibiotics.
    Leclercq R; Nicolas-Chanoine MH; Nordmann P; Philippon A; Marchais P; Buu-Ho A; Chardon H; Dabernat H; Doucet-Populaire F; Grasmick C; Legrand P; Muller-Serieys C; Nguyen J; Ploy MC; Reverdy ME; Weber M; Courcol RJ
    Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 2001 Sep; 20(9):626-35. PubMed ID: 11714043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Automated reading of MIC microdilution trays containing fluorogenic enzyme substrates with the Sensititre Autoreader.
    Staneck JL; Allen SD; Harris EE; Tilton RC
    J Clin Microbiol; 1985 Aug; 22(2):187-91. PubMed ID: 4031033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Integrating Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing: A Simple and Rapid Approach to Reduce the Turnaround Time in the Management of Blood Cultures.
    Pereira DC; Goldani LZ
    Biomed Res Int; 2019; 2019():8041746. PubMed ID: 31687399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Evaluation of inoculum density prepared by prompt inoculation system and antimicrobial susceptibility test results by the automated MicroScan WalkAway system].
    Nakasone I; Higa M; Furugen F; Yamane N
    Rinsho Biseibutshu Jinsoku Shindan Kenkyukai Shi; 1999 Dec; 10(2):83-9. PubMed ID: 10681710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Evaluation of the MicroScan antimicrobial susceptibility system with the autoSCAN-4 automated reader.
    Baker CN; Stocker SA; Rhoden DL; Thornsberry C
    J Clin Microbiol; 1986 Jan; 23(1):143-8. PubMed ID: 3700598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing of gram-positive cocci using Baxter MicroScan rapid fluorogenic panels and autoSCAN-W/A.
    Bascomb S; Godsey JH; Kangas M; Nea L; Tomfohrde KM
    Pathol Biol (Paris); 1991 May; 39(5):466-70. PubMed ID: 1881676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Evaluation of the Wider system, a new computer-assisted image-processing device for bacterial identification and susceptibility testing.
    Cantón R; Pérez-Vázquez M; Oliver A; Sánchez Del Saz B; Gutiérrez MO; Martínez-Ferrer M; Baquero F
    J Clin Microbiol; 2000 Apr; 38(4):1339-46. PubMed ID: 10747104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Revised approach for identification and detection of ampicillin and vancomycin resistance in Enterococcus species by using MicroScan panels.
    Iwen PC; Kelly DM; Linder J; Hinrichs SH
    J Clin Microbiol; 1996 Jul; 34(7):1779-83. PubMed ID: 8784589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of carbapenems: multicenter validity testing and accuracy levels of five antimicrobial test methods for detecting resistance in Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates.
    Steward CD; Mohammed JM; Swenson JM; Stocker SA; Williams PP; Gaynes RP; McGowan JE; Tenover FC
    J Clin Microbiol; 2003 Jan; 41(1):351-8. PubMed ID: 12517872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing of gram-negative bacilli using Baxter MicroScan rapid fluorogenic panels and autoSCAN-W/A.
    Godsey JH; Bascomb S; Bonnette T; Kangas M; Link K; Richards K; Tomfohrde KM
    Pathol Biol (Paris); 1991 May; 39(5):461-5. PubMed ID: 1881675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparison of agar dilution, broth microdilution, E-test, disk diffusion, and automated Vitek methods for testing susceptibilities of Enterococcus spp. to vancomycin.
    Kohner PC; Patel R; Uhl JR; Garin KM; Hopkins MK; Wegener LT; Cockerill FR
    J Clin Microbiol; 1997 Dec; 35(12):3258-63. PubMed ID: 9399530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Laboratory-based evaluation of a fully automated microbiology system, RAISUS for species-identification and antimicrobial susceptibility tests].
    Onaga S; Yamane N; Nakasone I
    Rinsho Biseibutshu Jinsoku Shindan Kenkyukai Shi; 2003; 14(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 14984301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Evaluation of MicroScan and Phoenix system for rapid identification and susceptibility testing using direct inoculation from positive BACTEC blood culture bottles].
    Chung JW; Jeon HS; Sung H; Kim MN
    Korean J Lab Med; 2009 Feb; 29(1):25-34. PubMed ID: 19262075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Different Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Methods to Determine Vancomycin Susceptibility and MIC for
    Chung HS; Lee M
    Diagnostics (Basel); 2022 Mar; 12(4):. PubMed ID: 35453893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Evaluation of the automated phoenix system for potential routine use in the clinical microbiology laboratory.
    Donay JL; Mathieu D; Fernandes P; Prégermain C; Bruel P; Wargnier A; Casin I; Weill FX; Lagrange PH; Herrmann JL
    J Clin Microbiol; 2004 Apr; 42(4):1542-6. PubMed ID: 15071001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Two-center collaborative evaluation of performance of the BD phoenix automated microbiology system for identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing of gram-negative bacteria.
    Menozzi MG; Eigner U; Covan S; Rossi S; Somenzi P; Dettori G; Chezzi C; Fahr AM
    J Clin Microbiol; 2006 Nov; 44(11):4085-94. PubMed ID: 17005752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Evaluation of the BD Phoenix automated identification and susceptibility testing system in clinical microbiology laboratory practice.
    Stefaniuk E; Baraniak A; Gniadkowski M; Hryniewicz W
    Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 2003 Aug; 22(8):479-85. PubMed ID: 12884060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Accuracy of six antimicrobial susceptibility methods for testing linezolid against staphylococci and enterococci.
    Tenover FC; Williams PP; Stocker S; Thompson A; Clark LA; Limbago B; Carey RB; Poppe SM; Shinabarger D; McGowan JE
    J Clin Microbiol; 2007 Sep; 45(9):2917-22. PubMed ID: 17634301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.