166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12735536)
1. A biomechanical investigation into the validity of the modified Ashworth Scale as a measure of elbow spasticity.
Pandyan AD; Price CI; Barnes MP; Johnson GR
Clin Rehabil; 2003 May; 17(3):290-3. PubMed ID: 12735536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Biomechanical examination of a commonly used measure of spasticity.
Pandyan AD; Price CI; Rodgers H; Barnes MP; Johnson GR
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2001 Dec; 16(10):859-65. PubMed ID: 11733123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Biomechanical measurement of post-stroke spasticity.
Kumar RT; Pandyan AD; Sharma AK
Age Ageing; 2006 Jul; 35(4):371-5. PubMed ID: 16675479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A review of the properties and limitations of the Ashworth and modified Ashworth Scales as measures of spasticity.
Pandyan AD; Johnson GR; Price CI; Curless RH; Barnes MP; Rodgers H
Clin Rehabil; 1999 Oct; 13(5):373-83. PubMed ID: 10498344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Electromyography characterization of stretch responses in hemiparetic stroke patients and their relationship with the Modified Ashworth scale.
Cooper A; Musa IM; van Deursen R; Wiles CM
Clin Rehabil; 2005 Oct; 19(7):760-6. PubMed ID: 16250195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinometric properties of a clinical spasticity measurement tool.
Voerman GE; Burridge JH; Hitchcock RA; Hermens HJ
Disabil Rehabil; 2007 Dec; 29(24):1870-80. PubMed ID: 17852281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Inter-rater reliability of the Modified Ashworth Scale and modified Modified Ashworth Scale in assessing poststroke elbow flexor spasticity.
Kaya T; Karatepe AG; Gunaydin R; Koc A; Altundal Ercan U
Int J Rehabil Res; 2011 Mar; 34(1):59-64. PubMed ID: 20671560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Time course analysis of the effects of botulinum toxin type a on elbow spasticity based on biomechanic and electromyographic parameters.
Lee HM; Chen JJ; Wu YN; Wang YL; Huang SC; Piotrkiewicz M
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2008 Apr; 89(4):692-9. PubMed ID: 18374000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The construct validity of a spasticity measurement device for clinical practice: an alternative to the Ashworth scales.
Pandyan AD; Van Wijck FM; Stark S; Vuadens P; Johnson GR; Barnes MP
Disabil Rehabil; 2006 May; 28(9):579-85. PubMed ID: 16690587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Normalization factor for the assessment of elbow spasticity with passive stretch measurement: maximum torque VS. body weight.
Wang L; Guo X; Samuel OW; Huang P; Wang H; Li G
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2018 Jul; 2018():388-391. PubMed ID: 30440416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Stop using the Ashworth Scale for the assessment of spasticity.
Fleuren JF; Voerman GE; Erren-Wolters CV; Snoek GJ; Rietman JS; Hermens HJ; Nene AV
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry; 2010 Jan; 81(1):46-52. PubMed ID: 19770162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Test-retest reliability and inter-rater reliability of the Modified Tardieu Scale and the Modified Ashworth Scale in hemiplegic patients with stroke.
Li F; Wu Y; Li X
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med; 2014 Feb; 50(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 24309501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. KAPS (kinematic assessment of passive stretch): a tool to assess elbow flexor and extensor spasticity after stroke using a robotic exoskeleton.
Centen A; Lowrey CR; Scott SH; Yeh TT; Mochizuki G
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2017 Jun; 14(1):59. PubMed ID: 28629415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The Tardieu Scale differentiates contracture from spasticity whereas the Ashworth Scale is confounded by it.
Patrick E; Ada L
Clin Rehabil; 2006 Feb; 20(2):173-82. PubMed ID: 16541938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of spastic muscle in stroke survivors using magnetic resonance imaging and resistance to passive motion.
Ploutz-Snyder LL; Clark BC; Logan L; Turk M
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2006 Dec; 87(12):1636-42. PubMed ID: 17141645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Relationship Between Spasticity and Upper-Limb Movement Disorders in Individuals With Subacute Stroke Using Stochastic Spatiotemporal Modeling.
Davidowitz I; Parmet Y; Frenkel-Toledo S; Baniña MC; Soroker N; Solomon JM; Liebermann DG; Levin MF; Berman S
Neurorehabil Neural Repair; 2019 Feb; 33(2):141-152. PubMed ID: 30744528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Simultaneous Ashworth measurements and electromyographic recordings in tetraplegic patients.
Sköld C; Harms-Ringdahl K; Hultling C; Levi R; Seiger A
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1998 Aug; 79(8):959-65. PubMed ID: 9710170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An investigation into the agreement between clinical, biomechanical and neurophysiological measures of spasticity.
Malhotra S; Cousins E; Ward A; Day C; Jones P; Roffe C; Pandyan A
Clin Rehabil; 2008 Dec; 22(12):1105-15. PubMed ID: 19052249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Immediate effects of electrical stimulation combined with passive locomotion-like movement on gait velocity and spasticity in persons with hemiparetic stroke: a randomized controlled study.
Yamaguchi T; Tanabe S; Muraoka Y; Masakado Y; Kimura A; Tsuji T; Liu M
Clin Rehabil; 2012 Jul; 26(7):619-28. PubMed ID: 22089962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of velocity-dependent performance of the spastic elbow during voluntary movements.
Song R; Tong KY; Hu XL
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2008 Jun; 89(6):1140-5. PubMed ID: 18503812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
