These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12735882)

  • 1. [Can patients read what we want them to read? Analysis of the readability of printed materials for health education].
    Barrio Cantalejo IM; Simón Lorda P
    Aten Primaria; 2003 Apr; 31(7):409-14. PubMed ID: 12735882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Readability levels of selected hypercholesterolemia patient education literature.
    Merritt SL; Gates MA; Skiba K
    Heart Lung; 1993; 22(5):415-20. PubMed ID: 8226005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Readability Levels of Dental Patient Education Brochures.
    Boles CD; Liu Y; November-Rider D
    J Dent Hyg; 2016 Feb; 90(1):28-34. PubMed ID: 26896514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Readability of patient education materials in ophthalmology: a single-institution study and systematic review.
    Williams AM; Muir KW; Rosdahl JA
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2016 Aug; 16():133. PubMed ID: 27487960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessing the readability of skin care and pressure ulcer patient education materials.
    Wilson FL; Williams BN
    J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2003 Jul; 30(4):224-30. PubMed ID: 12851598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Readability of patient information pamphlets in urogynecology.
    Reagan KM; O'Sullivan DM; Harvey DP; Lasala CA
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2015; 21(2):63-5. PubMed ID: 25679357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessing Readability: Are Urogynecologic Patient Education Materials at an Appropriate Reading Level?
    Haller J; Keller Z; Barr S; Hadden K; Oliphant SS
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2019; 25(2):139-144. PubMed ID: 30807416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessment of online patient education materials from major ophthalmologic associations.
    Huang G; Fang CH; Agarwal N; Bhagat N; Eloy JA; Langer PD
    JAMA Ophthalmol; 2015 Apr; 133(4):449-54. PubMed ID: 25654639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Patient literacy and the readability of written cancer educational materials.
    Cooley ME; Moriarty H; Berger MS; Selm-Orr D; Coyle B; Short T
    Oncol Nurs Forum; 1995 Oct; 22(9):1345-51. PubMed ID: 8539175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A descriptive study of the readability of patient information leaflets designed by nurses.
    Mumford ME
    J Adv Nurs; 1997 Nov; 26(5):985-91. PubMed ID: 9372404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Consensus on the legibility criteria of health education leaflets].
    Barrio-Cantalejo I; Simón-Lorda P; Jiménez MM; Ruiz AM
    An Sist Sanit Navar; 2011; 34(2):153-65. PubMed ID: 21904399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Readability of advance directive documents.
    Ott BB; Hardie TL
    Image J Nurs Sch; 1997; 29(1):53-7. PubMed ID: 9127541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. "I can't understand your information sheet, doc!" Readability of limited-reach media materials for the lay population.
    Wasson W; Scarbecz M; Lewis MW; Ross J; Himel V
    J Tenn Dent Assoc; 2013; 93(2):32-40; quiz 41-2. PubMed ID: 24611219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Readability of printed sources of diet and health information.
    Dollahite J; Thompson C; McNew R
    Patient Educ Couns; 1996 Mar; 27(2):123-34. PubMed ID: 8788342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Readability of patient education materials: a comparison of rural and urban cardiac rehabilitation sites in Minnesota.
    Johnson JL; Stern EB
    J Cardiopulm Rehabil; 2004; 24(2):121-7. PubMed ID: 15052116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Suitability and readability assessment of printed educational materials on hypertension].
    Lee TW; Kang SJ; Kim HH; Woo SR; Kim S
    J Korean Acad Nurs; 2011 Jun; 41(3):333-43. PubMed ID: 21804342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Readability, Content, and Quality Assessment of Web-Based Patient Education Materials Addressing Neuraxial Labor Analgesia.
    Patel SK; Gordon EJ; Wong CA; Grobman WA; Goucher H; Toledo P
    Anesth Analg; 2015 Nov; 121(5):1295-300. PubMed ID: 26252170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Readability of patient education materials.
    Vivian AS; Robertson EJ
    Clin Ther; 1980; 3(2):129-36. PubMed ID: 7448843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Spanish Language Pelvic Floor Disorders Patient Information Handouts: How Readable Are They?
    Robb J; Mackay A; Rondeau N; Palomino J; Mulla ZD; Montoya TI; Mallett VT
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2019; 25(1):72-75. PubMed ID: 29095247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Readability and patient education materials used for low-income populations.
    Wilson M
    Clin Nurse Spec; 2009; 23(1):33-40; quiz 41-2. PubMed ID: 19098513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.