These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12735916)

  • 1. Marginal and internal adaptation of extended class I restorations lined with flowable composites.
    Haak R; Wicht MJ; Noack MJ
    J Dent; 2003 May; 31(4):231-9. PubMed ID: 12735916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of flowable composite liner and glass ionomer liner on class II gingival marginal adaptation of direct composite restorations with different bonding strategies.
    Aggarwal V; Singla M; Yadav S; Yadav H
    J Dent; 2014 May; 42(5):619-25. PubMed ID: 24631232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. In vitro marginal adaptation of high-viscosity resin composite restorations bonded to dentin cavities.
    Rahiotis C; Tzoutzas J; Kakaboura A
    J Adhes Dent; 2004; 6(1):49-53. PubMed ID: 15119587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Flowable materials as an intermediate layer could improve the marginal and internal adaptation of composite restorations in Class-V-cavities.
    Li Q; Jepsen S; Albers HK; Eberhard J
    Dent Mater; 2006 Mar; 22(3):250-7. PubMed ID: 16084584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of flowable resin composite on microleakage and internal voids in class II composite restorations.
    Olmez A; Oztas N; Bodur H
    Oper Dent; 2004; 29(6):713-9. PubMed ID: 15646229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effect of additional enamel etching and a flowable composite to the interfacial integrity of Class II adhesive composite restorations.
    Belli S; Inokoshi S; Ozer F; Pereira PN; Ogata M; Tagami J
    Oper Dent; 2001; 26(1):70-5. PubMed ID: 11203780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of flowable resin on bond strength and gap formation in Class I restorations.
    Miguez PA; Pereira PN; Foxton RM; Walter R; Nunes MF; Swift EJ
    Dent Mater; 2004 Nov; 20(9):839-45. PubMed ID: 15451239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cavity wall adaptation of resin-based composites lined with flowable composites.
    Estafan D; Estafan A; Leinfelder KF
    Am J Dent; 2000 Aug; 13(4):192-4. PubMed ID: 11763929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Marginal and internal adaptation of bulk-filled Class I and Cuspal coverage direct resin composite restorations.
    Stavridakis MM; Kakaboura AI; Ardu S; Krejci I
    Oper Dent; 2007; 32(5):515-23. PubMed ID: 17910230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Microleakage of silorane- and methacrylate-based class V composite restorations.
    Krifka S; Federlin M; Hiller KA; Schmalz G
    Clin Oral Investig; 2012 Aug; 16(4):1117-24. PubMed ID: 21947906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Concurrent evaluation of composite internal adaptation and bond strength in a class-I cavity.
    Bakhsh TA; Sadr A; Shimada Y; Mandurah MM; Hariri I; Alsayed EZ; Tagami J; Sumi Y
    J Dent; 2013 Jan; 41(1):60-70. PubMed ID: 23044389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of flowable composite lining and operator experience on microleakage and internal voids in class II composite restorations.
    Chuang SF; Liu JK; Chao CC; Liao FP; Chen YH
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Feb; 85(2):177-83. PubMed ID: 11208208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A split-mouth randomized clinical trial of conventional and heavy flowable composites in class II restorations.
    Rocha Gomes Torres C; Rêgo HM; Perote LC; Santos LF; Kamozaki MB; Gutierrez NC; Di Nicoló R; Borges AB
    J Dent; 2014 Jul; 42(7):793-9. PubMed ID: 24769385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. In vitro microleakage study of a condensable and flowable composite resin.
    Tung FF; Hsieh WW; Estafan D
    Gen Dent; 2000; 48(6):711-5. PubMed ID: 12004668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. In vivo interfacial adaptation of class II resin composite restorations with and without a flowable resin composite liner.
    Lindberg A; van Dijken JW; Hörstedt P
    Clin Oral Investig; 2005 Jun; 9(2):77-83. PubMed ID: 15815923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of eugenol-containing sealer on marginal adaptation of dentine-bonded resin fillings.
    Peters O; Göhring TN; Lutz F
    Int Endod J; 2000 Jan; 33(1):53-9. PubMed ID: 11307474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Marginal leakage of filled dentin adhesives used with wet and dry bonding techniques.
    Santini A; Plasschaert AJ; Mitchell S
    Am J Dent; 2000 Apr; 13(2):93-7. PubMed ID: 11764834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Marginal and internal adaptation of class II restorations after immediate or delayed composite placement.
    Dietschi D; Monasevic M; Krejci I; Davidson C
    J Dent; 2002; 30(5-6):259-69. PubMed ID: 12450717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Marginal adaptation of class II cavities restored with bulk-fill composites.
    Campos EA; Ardu S; Lefever D; Jassé FF; Bortolotto T; Krejci I
    J Dent; 2014 May; 42(5):575-81. PubMed ID: 24561041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Marginal adaptation of an etch-and-rinse adhesive with a new type of solvent in class II cavities after artificial aging.
    Manhart J; Trumm C
    Clin Oral Investig; 2010 Dec; 14(6):699-705. PubMed ID: 19937075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.