These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12736916)

  • 1. Estimates of diagnostic accuracy efficacy: how well can this test perform the classification task?
    Trop I; Stolberg HO; Nahmias C
    Can Assoc Radiol J; 2003 Apr; 54(2):80-6. PubMed ID: 12736916
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The leaf plot: a novel way of presenting the value of tests.
    Coulthard MG; Coulthard T
    Br J Gen Pract; 2019 Apr; 69(681):205-206. PubMed ID: 30858331
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Correcting for verification bias in studies of a diagnostic test's accuracy.
    Zhou XH
    Stat Methods Med Res; 1998 Dec; 7(4):337-53. PubMed ID: 9871951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Basic principles of diagnostic evaluation].
    Cohen J; Dubos F; Bossuyt P; Chalumeau M; Levy C; Martinot A
    Arch Pediatr; 2015 May; 22(5 Suppl 1):186-7. PubMed ID: 26112584
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A randomized trial of ways to describe test accuracy: the effect on physicians' post-test probability estimates.
    Puhan MA; Steurer J; Bachmann LM; ter Riet G
    Ann Intern Med; 2005 Aug; 143(3):184-9. PubMed ID: 16061916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Complementary examinations].
    Huguier M
    Chirurgia (Bucur); 2005; 100(1):85-7. PubMed ID: 15810712
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Clinical use of diagnostic tests (Part 1): Analysis of the properties of a diagnostic test].
    Cerda L J; Cifuentes A L
    Rev Chilena Infectol; 2010 Jun; 27(3):205-8. PubMed ID: 20737121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Commentary: black and white or shades of grey?
    Battaglia M; Pewsner D
    Int J Epidemiol; 2003 Apr; 32(2):314-5. PubMed ID: 12714555
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Presentation of diagnostic test accuracy.
    Broce M; Reyes B
    Ann Intern Med; 2006 Feb; 144(3):220-1; author reply 221-2. PubMed ID: 16461972
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Presentation of diagnostic test accuracy.
    Brotman DJ
    Ann Intern Med; 2006 Feb; 144(3):221; author reply 221-2. PubMed ID: 16461974
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An algorithm for the classification of study designs to assess diagnostic, prognostic and predictive test accuracy in systematic reviews.
    Mathes T; Pieper D
    Syst Rev; 2019 Sep; 8(1):226. PubMed ID: 31481098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of diagnostic tests for infectious diseases: general principles.
    ; Banoo S; Bell D; Bossuyt P; Herring A; Mabey D; Poole F; Smith PG; Sriram N; Wongsrichanalai C; Linke R; O'Brien R; Perkins M
    Nat Rev Microbiol; 2008 Nov; 6(11 Suppl):S16-26. PubMed ID: 22745954
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Diagnostic studies should follow international guidelines. Planning and evaluation requires theoretical and practical considerations].
    Björk J; Hellström M; Mejare I; Nyman U
    Lakartidningen; 2013 Mar 13-19; 110(11):562-5. PubMed ID: 23596850
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Test accuracy and potential sources of bias in diagnostic test evaluation.
    Bell KJ; Macaskill P; Loy C
    Med J Aust; 2020 Jan; 212(1):10-13.e1. PubMed ID: 31851371
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The spectrum effect in tests for risk prediction, screening, and diagnosis.
    Usher-Smith JA; Sharp SJ; Griffin SJ
    BMJ; 2016 Jun; 353():i3139. PubMed ID: 27334281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sensitivity and specificity should be de-emphasized in diagnostic accuracy studies.
    Moons KG; Harrell FE
    Acad Radiol; 2003 Jun; 10(6):670-2. PubMed ID: 12809422
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Critically appraising studies reporting assessing diagnostic tests.
    O'Connor A; Evans RB
    Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract; 2007 May; 37(3):487-97. PubMed ID: 17466752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. General radiologists' diagnostic accuracy: incomplete presentation of data casts doubt on study's conclusions.
    Zivian MT; Gershater R; Erly WK; Ashdown BC; Lucio RW
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Feb; 184(2):697-9. PubMed ID: 15671405
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. When is measuring sensitivity and specificity sufficient to evaluate a diagnostic test, and when do we need randomized trials?
    Lord SJ; Irwig L; Simes RJ
    Ann Intern Med; 2006 Jun; 144(11):850-5. PubMed ID: 16754927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Results of diagnostic accuracy studies are not always validated.
    Van den Bruel A; Aertgeerts B; Buntinx F
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2006 Jun; 59(6):559-66. PubMed ID: 16713517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.