BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

335 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12736933)

  • 1. Predicting pressure ulcer sore risk.
    Ayello EA
    Medsurg Nurs; 2003 Apr; 12(2):130-1. PubMed ID: 12736933
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. How to try this: predicting pressure ulcer risk. Using the Braden scale with hospitalized older adults: the evidence supports it.
    Stotts NA; Gunningberg L
    Am J Nurs; 2007 Nov; 107(11):40-8; quiz 48-9. PubMed ID: 18075340
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Clinical assessment of the decubitus ulcer risk. Identifying nursing expertise].
    Balzer K
    Pflege Z; 2012 Dec; 65(12):710-3. PubMed ID: 23330270
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A pressure sore risk scale for use with older people.
    McCormack HC
    Prof Nurse; 1996 Jul; 11(10):673-4, 676. PubMed ID: 8718376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Choosing pressure sore risk assessment tools.
    Flanagan M
    Prof Nurse; 1997 Mar; 12(6 Suppl):S3-7. PubMed ID: 9128641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison of three risk assessment scales.
    Maylor M; Roberts A
    Prof Nurse; 1999 Jun; 14(9):629-32. PubMed ID: 10427299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Predicting pressure ulcer risk with the modified Braden, Braden, and Norton scales in acute care hospitals in Mainland China.
    Kwong E; Pang S; Wong T; Ho J; Shao-ling X; Li-jun T
    Appl Nurs Res; 2005 May; 18(2):122-8. PubMed ID: 15991112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Risk assessment tools for pressure ulcers.
    Langemo DK
    Adv Wound Care; 1999; 12(1):42-4. PubMed ID: 10326356
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Do risk assessment scales for pressure ulcers work?
    Anthony D; Papanikolaou P; Parboteeah S; Saleh M
    J Tissue Viability; 2010 Nov; 19(4):132-6. PubMed ID: 20036124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Predicting pressure ulcer sore risk.
    Ayello EA
    J Gerontol Nurs; 1999 Oct; 25(10):7-9. PubMed ID: 10776147
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Waterlow assessment: not a predictor.
    Waterlow JA
    Br J Nurs; 2005 Jul 14-27; 14(13):689. PubMed ID: 16178097
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Predictive validity of the Braden Scale for Pressure Ulcer Risk in elderly residents of long-term care facilities.
    de Souza DM; Santos VL; Iri HK; Sadasue Oguri MY
    Geriatr Nurs; 2010; 31(2):95-104. PubMed ID: 20381710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Pressure ulcer risk assessment scales--the missing link.
    Olshansky K
    Adv Wound Care; 1998; 11(2):90. PubMed ID: 9729940
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Inter-rater reliability of risk-assessment scales.
    Watkinson C
    Prof Nurse; 1996 Aug; 11(11):751-2, 755-6. PubMed ID: 8718321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Developing a pressure sore risk assessment scale.
    Watkinson C
    Prof Nurse; 1997 Feb; 12(5):341-6, 348. PubMed ID: 9128687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Pressure sore risk assessment.
    Flanagan M
    J Wound Care; 1998 Oct; 7(9):484. PubMed ID: 9887742
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A record sheet for pressure sore risk assessment.
    Harding CA
    Prof Nurse; 1999 Aug; 14(11):778-82. PubMed ID: 10481708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An evaluation of the Waterlow pressure ulcer risk-assessment tool.
    Thompson D
    Br J Nurs; 2005 Apr 28-May 11; 14(8):455-9. PubMed ID: 15924028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Pressure sore assessments.
    Waterlow J
    Nurs Times; 1996 Jul 17-23; 92(29):53-6, 58. PubMed ID: 8718142
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Evaluation of the risk of decubitus lesions in hospitalized patients].
    Riv Inferm; 1995; 14(4):187-93. PubMed ID: 8715195
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.