164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12737192)
1. Ms B and legal competence: examining the role of nurses in difficult ethico-legal decision-making.
Goodman B
Nurs Crit Care; 2003; 8(2):78-83. PubMed ID: 12737192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Ms. B and legal competence: interprofessional collaboration and nurse autonomy.
Goodman B
Nurs Crit Care; 2004; 9(6):271-6. PubMed ID: 15575636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The living will--are you for or against?
Bassett C
J Fam Health Care; 2003; 13(1):9. PubMed ID: 12696299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Quandary at the crossroads: paternalism versus advocacy surrounding end-of-treatment decisions.
Taylor SL
Am J Hosp Palliat Care; 1995; 12(4):43-6. PubMed ID: 7632492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The significance for critical care nurses of the "dying with dignity" legislation.
Henderson A
Aust Crit Care; 1994 Jun; 7(2):23-6. PubMed ID: 8061480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Critical incident: reflection on the process of terminal weaning.
Keen A
Br J Nurs; 2000 Sep 14-27; 9(16):1059-62. PubMed ID: 12785085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The Schiavo legacy.
Smith AP
Nurs Econ; 2005; 23(3):136-7. PubMed ID: 16033143
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Thunder from California: the Thor decision and the ever-expanding right to die.
Brown LC; Paine SJ
Healthspan; 1993 Oct; 10(9):13-7. PubMed ID: 10183992
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. A proposed bill on assisted dying in the UK.
Pang SM
Nurs Ethics; 2006 Mar; 13(2):103-4. PubMed ID: 16526145
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Legal mechanisms to protect dialysis patients' end-of-life decisions.
Riley J; Pristave R
Nephrol News Issues; 2005 Jun; 19(7):53-4. PubMed ID: 16008024
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. A right to die?
Jones LC
Intensive Crit Care Nurs; 1994 Dec; 10(4):278-88. PubMed ID: 7833634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Between euthanasia and unreasonable continuation of therapy, where is the room for nursing thought?].
Rautureau P
Rev Infirm; 2008; (142):36-8. PubMed ID: 18709840
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Modern medicine and the Hippocratic tradition of medicine: restoring professional values.
Rady MY; Verheijde JL
Intensive Care Med; 2011 Aug; 37(8):1392-3. PubMed ID: 21674135
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Autonomy and the critically ill patient: the legal issues.
Moskowitz LD; Moskowitz S
Heart Lung; 1986 Sep; 15(5):520-4. PubMed ID: 3639078
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Nursing involvement in euthanasia: a 'nursing-as-healing-praxis' approach.
McCabe H
Nurs Philos; 2007 Jul; 8(3):176-86. PubMed ID: 17581245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparison of Cruzan and Schiavo: the burden of proof, due process, and autonomy in the persistently vegetative patient.
Mareiniss DP
J Leg Med; 2005 Jun; 26(2):233-59. PubMed ID: 16036814
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. End of life decisions: nurses perceptions, feelings and experiences.
McMillen RE
Intensive Crit Care Nurs; 2008 Aug; 24(4):251-9. PubMed ID: 18162401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Issues of death and dying: the perspective of critical care nurses.
Cartwright C; Steinberg M; Williams G; Najman J; Williams G
Aust Crit Care; 1997 Sep; 10(3):81-7. PubMed ID: 9362607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Leonetti Law, questions and problems].
Maroudy D
Soins; 2006 Sep; (708):52-3. PubMed ID: 17025005
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Legal basis of decision-making in critical care.
Cornock M
Nurs Crit Care; 2002; 7(5):235-40. PubMed ID: 12448505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
