1553 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12737240)
1. Comparing the efficacy of mandibular implant-retained overdentures and conventional dentures among middle-aged edentulous patients: satisfaction and functional assessment.
Awad MA; Lund JP; Dufresne E; Feine JS
Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(2):117-22. PubMed ID: 12737240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Oral health status and treatment satisfaction with mandibular implant overdentures and conventional dentures: a randomized clinical trial in a senior population.
Awad MA; Lund JP; Shapiro SH; Locker D; Klemetti E; Chehade A; Savard A; Feine JS
Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(4):390-6. PubMed ID: 12956494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Patient satisfaction with mandibular implant overdentures and conventional dentures 6 months after delivery.
Thomason JM; Lund JP; Chehade A; Feine JS
Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(5):467-73. PubMed ID: 14651229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Sex differences in denture satisfaction.
Pan S; Awad M; Thomason JM; Dufresne E; Kobayashi T; Kimoto S; Wollin SD; Feine JS
J Dent; 2008 May; 36(5):301-8. PubMed ID: 18394770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A clinical trial of patient satisfaction and prosthodontic needs with ball and bar attachments for implant-retained complete overdentures: three-year results.
MacEntee MI; Walton JN; Glick N
J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Jan; 93(1):28-37. PubMed ID: 15623995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Relationship between prosthodontic evaluation and patient ratings of mandibular conventional and implant prostheses.
Heydecke G; Klemetti E; Awad MA; Lund JP; Feine JS
Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(3):307-12. PubMed ID: 12854797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Conventional rehabilitation of edentulous patients: the impact on oral health-related quality of life and patient satisfaction.
Ellis JS; Pelekis ND; Thomason JM
J Prosthodont; 2007; 16(1):37-42. PubMed ID: 17244306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparing the efficacy of mandibular implant-retained overdentures and conventional dentures among elderly edentulous patients: satisfaction and quality of life.
Assunção WG; Zardo GG; Delben JA; Barão VA
Gerodontology; 2007 Dec; 24(4):235-8. PubMed ID: 17999736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prosthetic aspects and patient satisfaction with resilient liner and clip attachments for bar- and implant-retained mandibular overdentures: a 3-year randomized clinical study.
ELsyad MA
Int J Prosthodont; 2012; 25(2):148-56. PubMed ID: 22371836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of prefabricated and custom-made bars used for implant-retained mandibular complete overdentures.
Abd El-Dayem MA; Assad AS; Eldin Sanad ME; Mahmoud Mogahed SA
Implant Dent; 2009 Dec; 18(6):501-11. PubMed ID: 20009604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Implant-retained mandibular overdentures versus conventional dentures: 10 years of care and aftercare.
Visser A; Meijer HJ; Raghoebar GM; Vissink A
Int J Prosthodont; 2006; 19(3):271-8. PubMed ID: 16752625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Restoration with implants in patients with recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa and patient satisfaction with the implant-supported superstructure.
Peñarrocha M; Larrazábal C; Balaguer J; Serrano C; Silvestre J; Bagán JV
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(4):651-5. PubMed ID: 17929528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effectiveness of 2-implant overdentures - a pragmatic international multicentre study.
Rashid F; Awad MA; Thomason JM; Piovano A; Spielberg GP; Scilingo E; Mojon P; Müller F; Spielberg M; Heydecke G; Stoker G; Wismeijer D; Allen F; Feine JS
J Oral Rehabil; 2011 Mar; 38(3):176-84. PubMed ID: 20704639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of three-implant-supported fixed dentures and two-implant-retained overdentures in the edentulous mandible: a pilot study of treatment efficacy and patient satisfaction.
De Kok IJ; Chang KH; Lu TS; Cooper LF
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(2):415-26. PubMed ID: 21483895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. One-year prosthetic outcomes with implant overdentures: a randomized clinical trial.
Walton JN; MacEntee MI; Glick N
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(3):391-8. PubMed ID: 12074455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Masticatory function and patient satisfaction with implant-supported mandibular overdentures: a prospective 5-year study.
Bakke M; Holm B; Gotfredsen K
Int J Prosthodont; 2002; 15(6):575-81. PubMed ID: 12475165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Should edentulous patients be constrained to removable complete dentures? The use of dental implants to improve the quality of life for edentulous patients.
Turkyilmaz I; Company AM; McGlumphy EA
Gerodontology; 2010 Mar; 27(1):3-10. PubMed ID: 19291086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Patient satisfaction with implant-retained mandibular overdentures: a retrospective study.
Siadat H; Alikhasi M; Mirfazaelian A; Geramipanah F; Zaery F
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2008 May; 10(2):93-8. PubMed ID: 18462205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Denture satisfaction in a comparative study of implant-retained mandibular overdentures: a randomized clinical trial.
Geertman ME; van Waas MA; van 't Hof MA; Kalk W
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1996; 11(2):194-200. PubMed ID: 8666450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Patient satisfaction and oral health-related quality of life outcomes of implant overdentures and fixed complete dentures.
Brennan M; Houston F; O'Sullivan M; O'Connell B
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(4):791-800. PubMed ID: 20657876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
