302 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12737249)
1. Fracture strength and failure mode of five different single-tooth implant-abutment combinations.
Strub JR; Gerds T
Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(2):167-71. PubMed ID: 12737249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Fracture resistance of single-tooth implant-supported all-ceramic restorations: an in vitro study.
Att W; Kurun S; Gerds T; Strub JR
J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Feb; 95(2):111-6. PubMed ID: 16473084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Fracture resistance of single-tooth implant-supported all-ceramic restorations after exposure to the artificial mouth.
Att W; Kurun S; Gerds T; Strub JR
J Oral Rehabil; 2006 May; 33(5):380-6. PubMed ID: 16629897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Fracture resistance and failure location of zirconium and metallic implant abutments.
Aramouni P; Zebouni E; Tashkandi E; Dib S; Salameh Z; Almas K
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 Nov; 9(7):41-8. PubMed ID: 18997915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Implant-abutment interface design affects fatigue and fracture strength of implants.
Steinebrunner L; Wolfart S; Ludwig K; Kern M
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Dec; 19(12):1276-84. PubMed ID: 19040443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Zirconia-implant-supported all-ceramic crowns withstand long-term load: a pilot investigation.
Kohal RJ; Klaus G; Strub JR
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2006 Oct; 17(5):565-71. PubMed ID: 16958698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The comparison of provisional luting agents and abutment surface roughness on the retention of provisional implant-supported crowns.
Kim Y; Yamashita J; Shotwell JL; Chong KH; Wang HL
J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Jun; 95(6):450-5. PubMed ID: 16765158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dynamic fatigue properties of the dental implant-abutment interface: joint opening in wide-diameter versus standard-diameter hex-type implants.
Hoyer SA; Stanford CM; Buranadham S; Fridrich T; Wagner J; Gratton D
J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Jun; 85(6):599-607. PubMed ID: 11404760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Strength and mode of failure of single implant all-ceramic abutment restorations under static load.
Tripodakis AP; Strub JR; Kappert HF; Witkowski S
Int J Prosthodont; 1995; 8(3):265-72. PubMed ID: 10348596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Load fatigue performance of implant-ceramic abutment combinations.
Nguyen HQ; Tan KB; Nicholls JI
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(4):636-46. PubMed ID: 19885403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The influence of veneering porcelain thickness of all-ceramic and metal ceramic crowns on failure resistance after cyclic loading.
Shirakura A; Lee H; Geminiani A; Ercoli C; Feng C
J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Feb; 101(2):119-27. PubMed ID: 19167536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Fatigue resistance of two implant/abutment joint designs.
Khraisat A; Stegaroiu R; Nomura S; Miyakawa O
J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Dec; 88(6):604-10. PubMed ID: 12488853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. An in vitro load evaluation of a conical implant system with 2 abutment designs and 3 different retaining-screw alloys.
Erneklint C; Odman P; Ortengren U; Karlsson S
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(5):733-7. PubMed ID: 17066634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Fracture frequency of all-ceramic crowns during dynamic loading in a chewing simulator using different loading and luting protocols.
Heintze SD; Cavalleri A; Zellweger G; Büchler A; Zappini G
Dent Mater; 2008 Oct; 24(10):1352-61. PubMed ID: 18433859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Survival rate, fracture strength and failure mode of ceramic implant abutments after chewing simulation.
Butz F; Heydecke G; Okutan M; Strub JR
J Oral Rehabil; 2005 Nov; 32(11):838-43. PubMed ID: 16202048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Fracture resistance of titanium and zirconia abutments: an in vitro study.
Foong JK; Judge RB; Palamara JE; Swain MV
J Prosthet Dent; 2013 May; 109(5):304-12. PubMed ID: 23684280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cementable implant crowns composed of cast superstructure frameworks luted to electroformed primary copings: an in vitro retention study.
Di Felice R; Rappelli G; Camaioni E; Cattani M; Meyer JM; Belser UC
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Feb; 18(1):108-13. PubMed ID: 17224031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Fracture force of tooth-tooth- and implant-tooth-supported all-ceramic fixed partial dentures using titanium vs. customised zirconia implant abutments.
Kolbeck C; Behr M; Rosentritt M; Handel G
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Oct; 19(10):1049-53. PubMed ID: 18707604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Fracture resistance of five different metal framework designs for metal-ceramic restorations.
Ulusoy M; Toksavul S
Int J Prosthodont; 2002; 15(6):571-4. PubMed ID: 12475164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of implant connection and restoration design (screwed vs. cemented) in reliability and failure modes of anterior crowns.
Freitas AC; Bonfante EA; Rocha EP; Silva NR; Marotta L; Coelho PG
Eur J Oral Sci; 2011 Aug; 119(4):323-30. PubMed ID: 21726295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
