These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12737610)

  • 1. Eyewitness identification accuracy: a comparison of adults with and those without intellectual disabilities.
    Ericson K; Isaacs B
    Ment Retard; 2003 Jun; 41(3):161-73. PubMed ID: 12737610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of postidentification feedback on eyewitness identification and nonidentification confidence.
    Semmler C; Brewer N; Wells GL
    J Appl Psychol; 2004 Apr; 89(2):334-46. PubMed ID: 15065979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Does methodology matter in eyewitness identification research? The effect of live versus video exposure on eyewitness identification accuracy.
    Pozzulo JD; Crescini C; Panton T
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2008; 31(5):430-7. PubMed ID: 18790535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Determining eyewitness identification accuracy using event-related brain potentials (ERPs).
    Lefebvre CD; Marchand Y; Smith SM; Connolly JF
    Psychophysiology; 2007 Nov; 44(6):894-904. PubMed ID: 17666030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The confidence-accuracy relationship in eyewitness identification: effects of lineup instructions, foil similarity, and target-absent base rates.
    Brewer N; Wells GL
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2006 Mar; 12(1):11-30. PubMed ID: 16536656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. What we know now: the Evanston Illinois field lineups.
    Steblay NK
    Law Hum Behav; 2011 Feb; 35(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 20177754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cueing confidence in eyewitness identifications: influence of biased lineup instructions and pre-identification memory feedback under varying lineup conditions.
    Leippe MR; Eisenstadt D; Rauch SM
    Law Hum Behav; 2009 Jun; 33(3):194-212. PubMed ID: 18600436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Outcomes of anti-bullying intervention for adults with intellectual disabilities.
    McGrath L; Jones RS; Hastings RP
    Res Dev Disabil; 2010; 31(2):376-80. PubMed ID: 19897338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Use of event-related brain potentials (ERPs) to assess eyewitness accuracy and deception.
    Lefebvre CD; Marchand Y; Smith SM; Connolly JF
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2009 Sep; 73(3):218-25. PubMed ID: 19303425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Adolescents with intellectual disabilities as victims of abuse.
    Reiter S; Bryen DN; Shachar I
    J Intellect Disabil; 2007 Dec; 11(4):371-87. PubMed ID: 18029413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of administrator-witness contact on eyewitness identification accuracy.
    Haw RM; Fisher RP
    J Appl Psychol; 2004 Dec; 89(6):1106-12. PubMed ID: 15584846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The confidence-accuracy relationship in eyewitness identification: the effects of reflection and disconfirmation on correlation and calibration.
    Brewer N; Keast A; Rishworth A
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2002 Mar; 8(1):44-56. PubMed ID: 12009176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Energy expended by adults with and without intellectual disabilities during activities of daily living.
    Lante K; Reece J; Walkley J
    Res Dev Disabil; 2010; 31(6):1380-9. PubMed ID: 20685074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Phenomenological reports diagnose accuracy of eyewitness identification decisions.
    Palmer MA; Brewer N; McKinnon AC; Weber N
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Feb; 133(2):137-45. PubMed ID: 19954764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Field experiments on eyewitness identification: towards a better understanding of pitfalls and prospects.
    Wells GL
    Law Hum Behav; 2008 Feb; 32(1):6-10. PubMed ID: 17610051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sequential lineup laps and eyewitness accuracy.
    Steblay NK; Dietrich HL; Ryan SL; Raczynski JL; James KA
    Law Hum Behav; 2011 Aug; 35(4):262-74. PubMed ID: 20632113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. PC_Eyewitness and the sequential superiority effect: computer-based lineup administration.
    MacLin OH; Zimmerman LA; Malpass RS
    Law Hum Behav; 2005 Jun; 29(3):303-21. PubMed ID: 15965630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Interviewing alleged victims with intellectual disabilities.
    Cederborg AC; Lamb M
    J Intellect Disabil Res; 2008 Jan; 52(Pt 1):49-58. PubMed ID: 18173572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Children's metacognitive judgments in an eyewitness identification task.
    Keast A; Brewer N; Wells GL
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2007 Aug; 97(4):286-314. PubMed ID: 17512942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of repeated listening experiences on the recognition of synthetic speech by individuals with severe intellectual disabilities.
    Koul R; Hester K
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2006 Feb; 49(1):47-57. PubMed ID: 16533072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.