391 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12737635)
41. Predicting health-utility scores from the Cervical Spine Outcomes Questionnaire in a multicenter nationwide study of anterior cervical spine surgery.
Skolasky RL; Carreon LY; Anderson PA; Albert TJ; Riley LH
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Dec; 36(25):2211-6. PubMed ID: 21343870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Responsiveness of EQ-5D and SF-6D in patients with early arthritis: results from the ESPOIR cohort.
Gaujoux-Viala C; Rat AC; Guillemin F; Flipo RM; Fardellone P; Bourgeois P; Fautrel B
Ann Rheum Dis; 2012 Sep; 71(9):1478-83. PubMed ID: 22419775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Responsiveness was similar between direct and mapped SF-6D in colorectal cancer patients who declined.
Wong CK; Mulhern B; Wan YF; Lam CL
J Clin Epidemiol; 2014 Feb; 67(2):219-27. PubMed ID: 24189090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Determining Health-Related Quality-of-Life Outcomes Using the SF-6D Following Total Hip Arthroplasty.
Elmallah RK; Chughtai M; Adib F; Bozic KJ; Kurtz SM; Mont MA
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2017 Mar; 99(6):494-498. PubMed ID: 28291182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Are English- and Chinese-language versions of the SF-6D equivalent? A comparison from a population-based study.
Wee HL; Cheung YB; Fong KY; Luo N; Machin D; Thumboo J
Clin Ther; 2004 Jul; 26(7):1137-48. PubMed ID: 15336479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Comparison of the EuroQol and short form 6D in Singapore multiethnic Asian knee osteoarthritis patients scheduled for total knee replacement.
Xie F; Li SC; Luo N; Lo NN; Yeo SJ; Yang KY; Fong KY; Thumboo J
Arthritis Rheum; 2007 Aug; 57(6):1043-9. PubMed ID: 17665466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. A Comparison of UK and Brazilian SF-6D Preference Weights When Applied to a Brazilian Urban Population.
Ferraz MB; Nardi EP; Campolina AG
Value Health Reg Issues; 2019 Dec; 20():21-27. PubMed ID: 30634088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Estimating the SF-6D value set for a population-based sample of Brazilians.
Cruz LN; Camey SA; Hoffmann JF; Rowen D; Brazier JE; Fleck MP; Polanczyk CA
Value Health; 2011; 14(5 Suppl 1):S108-14. PubMed ID: 21839880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Interchangeability of the EQ-5D and the SF-6D in long-lasting low back pain.
Søgaard R; Christensen FB; Videbaek TS; Bünger C; Christiansen T
Value Health; 2009 Jun; 12(4):606-12. PubMed ID: 19900258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. The development of a model for translation of the Neck Disability Index to utility scores for cost-utility analysis in cervical disorders.
Richardson SS; Berven S
Spine J; 2012 Jan; 12(1):55-62. PubMed ID: 22209244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Validation and comparison of EuroQol and short form 6D in chronic prostatitis patients.
Zhao FL; Yue M; Yang H; Wang T; Wu JH; Li SC
Value Health; 2010 Aug; 13(5):649-56. PubMed ID: 20412540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Longitudinal association of preference-weighted health-related quality of life measures and substance use disorder outcomes.
Pyne JM; Tripathi S; French M; McCollister K; Rapp RC; Booth BM
Addiction; 2011 Mar; 106(3):507-15. PubMed ID: 21205046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. The minimally important difference in clinical practice for patient-centered outcomes including health assessment questionnaire, fatigue, pain, sleep, global visual analog scale, and SF-36 in scleroderma.
Sekhon S; Pope J; ; Baron M
J Rheumatol; 2010 Mar; 37(3):591-8. PubMed ID: 20080913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Predicting SF-6D from the European Organization for Treatment and Research of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire scores in patients with colorectal cancer.
Wong CK; Lam CL; Wan YF; Rowen D
Value Health; 2013; 16(2):373-84. PubMed ID: 23538190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Consistency Between Three Different Ways of Administering the Short Form 6 Dimension Version 2.
Poder TG; Fauteux V; He J; Brazier JE
Value Health; 2019 Jul; 22(7):837-842. PubMed ID: 31277832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Comparative performance of the EQ-5D-5L and SF-6D index scores in adults with type 2 diabetes.
Sayah FA; Qiu W; Xie F; Johnson JA
Qual Life Res; 2017 Aug; 26(8):2057-2066. PubMed ID: 28364183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Predicting the short form-6D preference-based index using the eight mean short form-36 health dimension scores: estimating preference-based health-related utilities when patient level data are not available.
Ara R; Brazier J
Value Health; 2009; 12(2):346-53. PubMed ID: 18647248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Clinical cough IV:what is the minimal important difference for the Leicester Cough Questionnaire?
Raj AA; Pavord DI; Birring SS
Handb Exp Pharmacol; 2009; (187):311-20. PubMed ID: 18825348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Chilean population norms derived from the health-related quality of Life SF-6D.
Garcia-Gordillo MA; Collado-Mateo D; Olivares PR; Adsuar JC
Eur J Health Econ; 2018 Jun; 19(5):675-686. PubMed ID: 28631248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Clinically important deterioration in patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery: a choice of evaluation methods using the Oswestry Disability Index, 36-Item Short Form Health Survey, and pain scales: clinical article.
Gum JL; Glassman SD; Carreon LY
J Neurosurg Spine; 2013 Nov; 19(5):564-8. PubMed ID: 24010900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
