236 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12737921)
1. Maximum acceptable weights for asymmetric lifting of Chinese females.
Wu SP
Appl Ergon; 2003 May; 34(3):215-24. PubMed ID: 12737921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Psychophysically determined infrequent lifting capacity of Chinese participants.
Wu SP
Ergonomics; 1999 Jul; 42(7):952-63. PubMed ID: 10424184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The psychophysical lifting capacities of Chinese subjects.
Lee YH; Wu SP; Hsu SH
Ergonomics; 1995 Apr; 38(4):671-83. PubMed ID: 7729395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Postural effects on biomechanical and psychophysical weight-lifting limits.
Chaffin DB; Page GB
Ergonomics; 1994 Apr; 37(4):663-76. PubMed ID: 8187750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of asymmetric dynamic and isometric liftings on strength/force and rating of perceived exertion.
Hattori Y; Ono Y; Shimaoka M; Hiruta S; Kamijima M; Shibata E; Ichihara G; Ando S; Villaneuva MB; Takeuchi Y
Ergonomics; 1996 Jun; 39(6):862-76. PubMed ID: 8681928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The effect of asymmetry on psychophysical lifting capacity for three lifting types.
Han B; Stobbe TJ; Hobbs GR
Ergonomics; 2005 Mar; 48(4):364-79. PubMed ID: 15804846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Maximum acceptable weight of lift by Chinese experienced male manual handlers.
Wu SP
Appl Ergon; 1997 Aug; 28(4):237-44. PubMed ID: 9414362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Maximum acceptable weight of lift for manual lifting tasks].
Chen J; Yang L
Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi; 2006 Apr; 24(4):194-7. PubMed ID: 16701027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The effects of container size, frequency and extended horizontal reach on maximum acceptable weights of lifting for female industrial workers.
Ciriello VM
Appl Ergon; 2007 Jan; 38(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 16616883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effects of lifting frequency and technique on physical fatigue with special reference to psychophysical methodology and metabolic rate.
Garg A; Saxena U
Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1979 Oct; 40(10):894-503. PubMed ID: 525616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Maximum acceptable weight of lift for side and back lifting.
Lee K; Waikar A; Aghazadeh F
J Hum Ergol (Tokyo); 1990 Jun; 19(1):3-11. PubMed ID: 2092069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of background music on maximum acceptable weight of manual lifting tasks.
Yu R
Int J Occup Saf Ergon; 2014; 20(3):437-45. PubMed ID: 25189748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Maximum acceptable weight of lift for asymmetric lifting.
Cheng TS; Lee TH
Percept Mot Skills; 2003 Jun; 96(3 Pt 2):1339-46. PubMed ID: 12929792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Perceived exertion of physical effort for various manual handling tasks.
Asfour SS; Ayoub MM; Mital A; Bethea NJ
Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1983 Mar; 44(3):223-8. PubMed ID: 6846149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Psychophysical lifting capacity over extended periods.
Fernandez JE; Ayoub MM; Smith JL
Ergonomics; 1991 Jan; 34(1):23-32. PubMed ID: 2009847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Psychophysical determination of load carrying capacity for a 1-h work period by Chinese males.
Wu SP; Chen CC
Ergonomics; 2001 Sep; 44(11):1008-23. PubMed ID: 11693245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. An investigation of perceived exertion via whole body exertion and direct muscle force indicators during the determination of the maximum acceptable weight of lift.
Davis KG; Jorgensen MJ; Marras WS
Ergonomics; 2000 Feb; 43(2):143-59. PubMed ID: 10675055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Physiological and psychophysical responses in handling maximum acceptable weights under different footwear--floor friction conditions.
Li KW; Yu RF; Han XL
Appl Ergon; 2007 May; 38(3):259-65. PubMed ID: 17010302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Significance of biomechanical and physiological variables during the determination of maximum acceptable weight of lift.
Jorgensen MJ; Davis KG; Kirking BC; Lewis KE; Marras WS
Ergonomics; 1999 Sep; 42(9):1216-32. PubMed ID: 10503055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Spine loading as a function of lift frequency, exposure duration, and work experience.
Marras WS; Parakkat J; Chany AM; Yang G; Burr D; Lavender SA
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2006 May; 21(4):345-52. PubMed ID: 16310299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
