BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12739145)

  • 21. Superior visual search in adults with autism.
    O'riordan MA
    Autism; 2004 Sep; 8(3):229-48. PubMed ID: 15358868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Finding the target in search tasks using detection, localization, and identification responses.
    Dukewich KR; Klein RM
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2009 Mar; 63(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 19271810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Serial and parallel attentive visual searches: evidence from cumulative distribution functions of response times.
    Sung K
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Dec; 34(6):1372-88. PubMed ID: 19045981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Searching for camouflaged targets: effects of target-background similarity on visual search.
    Neider MB; Zelinsky GJ
    Vision Res; 2006 Jul; 46(14):2217-35. PubMed ID: 16497351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The roles of distractor noise and target certainty in search: a signal detection model.
    Santhi N; Reeves A
    Vision Res; 2004 Jun; 44(12):1235-56. PubMed ID: 15066389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Cross-trial priming of element positions in visual pop-out search is dependent on stimulus arrangement.
    Geyer T; Müller HJ; Krummenacher J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Aug; 33(4):788-97. PubMed ID: 17683228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Parallel and serial neural mechanisms for visual search in macaque area V4.
    Bichot NP; Rossi AF; Desimone R
    Science; 2005 Apr; 308(5721):529-34. PubMed ID: 15845848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Memory search following valid and invalid abrupt-onset cues.
    Homa D; Newton C; Terry D; Schafer S; Richter K
    Am J Psychol; 2007; 120(3):383-413. PubMed ID: 17892085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Visual search for singleton feature targets across dimensions: Stimulus- and expectancy-driven effects in dimensional weighting.
    Muller HJ; Reimann B; Krummenacher J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2003 Oct; 29(5):1021-35. PubMed ID: 14585020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Can intertrial effects of features and dimensions be explained by a single theory?
    Becker SI
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Dec; 34(6):1417-40. PubMed ID: 19045983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Do honeybees detect colour targets using serial or parallel visual search?
    Spaethe J; Tautz J; Chittka L
    J Exp Biol; 2006 Mar; 209(Pt 6):987-93. PubMed ID: 16513924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The mechanisms of involuntary attention.
    Prinzmetal W; Ha R; Khani A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Apr; 36(2):255-67. PubMed ID: 20364917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Guidance of eye movements during visual conjunction search: local and global contextual effects on target discriminability.
    Shen K; Paré M
    J Neurophysiol; 2006 May; 95(5):2845-55. PubMed ID: 16467428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The mechanism of priming: episodic retrieval or priming of pop-out?
    Becker SI
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Feb; 127(2):324-39. PubMed ID: 17868628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Attention capacity and task difficulty in visual search.
    Huang L; Pashler H
    Cognition; 2005 Jan; 94(3):B101-11. PubMed ID: 15617666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Optimal observer model of single-fixation oddity search predicts a shallow set-size function.
    Schoonveld W; Shimozaki SS; Eckstein MP
    J Vis; 2007 Jul; 7(10):1.1-16. PubMed ID: 17997670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Response selection modulates visual search within and across dimensions.
    Mortier K; Theeuwes J; Starreveld P
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2005 Jun; 31(3):542-57. PubMed ID: 15982130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Pip and pop: nonspatial auditory signals improve spatial visual search.
    Van der Burg E; Olivers CN; Bronkhorst AW; Theeuwes J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Oct; 34(5):1053-65. PubMed ID: 18823194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. When does visual attention select all features of a distractor?
    Chen Z; Cave KR
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Dec; 32(6):1452-64. PubMed ID: 17154784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Mirror-image symmetry and search asymmetry: a comparison of their effects on visual search and a possible unifying explanation.
    Davis ET; Shikano T; Main K; Hailston K; Michel RK; Sathian K
    Vision Res; 2006 Apr; 46(8-9):1263-81. PubMed ID: 16376402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.