These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12739593)
1. A feminist understanding of sex-selective abortion: solely a matter of choice? Cherry AL Wis Womens Law J; 1995; 10(2):161-223. PubMed ID: 12739593 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Exploring the ethics of induced abortion. Bandewar S Indian J Med Ethics; 2005; 2(1):18-21. PubMed ID: 16276621 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Does prenatal diagnosis morally require provision of selective abortion? Buccafurni D; Chang PL Am J Bioeth; 2009 Aug; 9(8):65-7. PubMed ID: 19998168 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Politically incorrect abortion. Boys only. Allen C New Repub; 1992 Mar; ():16-8. PubMed ID: 17340755 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Sex selection abortion and the boomerang effect of a woman's right to choose: a paradox of the skeptics. Kohm LM William Mary J Women Law; 1997; 4(1):91-128. PubMed ID: 16389677 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Protection of RU-486 as contraception, emergency contraception and as an abortifacient under the law of contraception. Wyser-Pratte RC Oregon Law Rev; 2000; 79(4):1121-56. PubMed ID: 12452141 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Women's rights versus the protection of fetuses. Warren MA Midwest Med Ethics; 1991; 7(1):1, 3-7. PubMed ID: 16145788 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. A woman decides: Justice O'Connor and due process rights of choice. Davis PC; Gilligan C McGeorge Law Rev; 2001; 32(3):895-914. PubMed ID: 16493803 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The women of Roe v. Wade. Glendon MA Hum Life Rev; 2003; 29(3):31-8. PubMed ID: 14964200 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Sexual dimorphism and the value of feminist bioethics. Matchett NJ Am J Bioeth; 2010 Jul; 10(7):18-20. PubMed ID: 20582821 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Ending parents' unlimited power to choose: legislation is necessary to prohibit parents' selection of their children's sex and characteristics. Plummer KM St Louis Univ Law J; 2003; 47(2):517-60. PubMed ID: 15478260 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The right to privacy: Roe v. Wade revisited. Smith PA Jurist; 1983; 43(2):289-317. PubMed ID: 16086474 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The rhetoric of disrespect: uncovering the faulty premises infecting reproductive rights. Reilly EA Am Univ J Gend Soc Policy Law; 1996; 5(1):147-205. PubMed ID: 16594108 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Who gets to choose? Responses to the foetal/maternal conflict. Hyams R E Law; 1995 Dec; 2(3):E7. PubMed ID: 16969923 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Lesbians and abortion. Robson R Rev Law Soc Change; 2011; 35(1):247-79. PubMed ID: 21774157 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Response to open peer commentaries on "Prenatal diagnosis and abortion for congenital abnormalities: is it ethical to provide one without the other?". Ballantyne A; Newson A; Luna F; Ashcroft R Am J Bioeth; 2009 Aug; 9(8):W6-7. PubMed ID: 19998146 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Consensual sex without assuming the risk of carrying an unwanted fetus; another foundation for the right to an abortion. Walen A Brooklyn Law Rev; 1997; 63():1051-140. PubMed ID: 12173635 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Abortion rights after South Dakota. McDonagh E Free Inq; 2006; 26(4):34-8. PubMed ID: 16830439 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Abortion 1990s: contemporary issues and the activist court. Bertz RC West State Univ Law Rev; 1992; 19(2):393-429. PubMed ID: 16047452 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Abortion in Thailand: a feminist perspective. Lerdmaleewong M; Francis C J Buddh Ethics; 1998; 5():22-48. PubMed ID: 16526123 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]