These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12739593)

  • 21. Prenatal genetic screening: the enigma of selective abortion.
    Stoller D
    J Law Health; 1997-1998; 12(1):121-40. PubMed ID: 10182027
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Cultural feminism: it sounds good, but will it work? Application to a husband's interest in his wife's abortion decision.
    Brunner SD
    Univ Dayton Law Rev; 1996; 22(1):101-23. PubMed ID: 16437821
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Choosing substantive justice: a discussion of "choice," "rights" and the new reproductive technologies.
    Cherry AL
    Wis Womens Law J; 1997; 11(3):431-41. PubMed ID: 16281338
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Reframing social justice, feminism and abortion.
    Farrell SA
    Conscience; 2005; 26(1):42-4. PubMed ID: 16639812
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Sex-determination and sex preselection tests in India: recent techniques in femicide.
    Patel V
    Reprod Genet Eng; 1989; 2(2):111-9. PubMed ID: 11659298
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. At home with Down syndrome and gender.
    Wong SI
    Hypatia; 2002; 17(3):89-117. PubMed ID: 14682339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Sex selection and restricting abortion and sex determination.
    Zilberberg J
    Bioethics; 2007 Nov; 21(9):517-9. PubMed ID: 17927629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Constitutionalizing Roe, Casey and Carhart: a legislative due-process anti-discrimination principle that gives constitutional content to the "undue burden" standard of review applied to abortion control legislation.
    Van Detta JA
    South Calif Rev Law Womens Stud; 2001; 10(2):211-92. PubMed ID: 16485363
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. New York v. Sullivan: shhh ... don't say the "a" word! Another outcome-oriented abortion decision.
    Kendall CC
    John Marshall Law Rev; 1990; 23(4):753-70. PubMed ID: 16622962
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. US pro-choice groups prepare for fight over Supreme Court nominee.
    Tanne JH
    BMJ; 2004 Nov; 329(7477):1254. PubMed ID: 15564237
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Genetic dilemmas and the child's right to an open future.
    Davis DS
    Rutgers Law J; 1997; 28():549-92. PubMed ID: 12465646
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Morgentaler v. The Queen in the Supreme Court of Canada.
    Martin SL
    Can J Women Law; 1987-1988; 2(2):422-31. PubMed ID: 17076040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Implications of the Federal Abortion Ban for Women's Health in the United States.
    Weitz TA; Yanow S
    Reprod Health Matters; 2008 May; 16(31 Suppl):99-107. PubMed ID: 18772090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Abortion and maternal-fetal conflict: broadening our concerns.
    Shultz MM
    South Calif Rev Law Womens Stud; 1992; 1():79-98. PubMed ID: 16437820
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Non-medical sex-selective abortion in China: ethical and public policy issues in the context of 40 million missing females.
    Nie JB
    Br Med Bull; 2011; 98():7-20. PubMed ID: 21596712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Prenatal v. parental rights: what a difference an "a" makes.
    Gallagher A
    St Marys Law J; 1989; 21(2):301-24. PubMed ID: 16100799
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Must we really make the case for abortion rights all over again?
    Forde C
    Conscience; 2005; 26(1):22-3. PubMed ID: 16639810
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. After Ayotte: the need to defend abortion rights with renewed "purpose.".
    Harv Law Rev; 2006 Jun; 119(8):2552-73. PubMed ID: 16827220
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Decreasing sex ratio and pregnant women's attitude towards female foeticide.
    Sarna K
    Nurs J India; 2005 Apr; 96(4):83-4. PubMed ID: 16173437
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Women and HIV: a gender-based analysis of a disease and its legal regulation.
    Bobinski MA
    Tex J Women Law; 1994; 3(1):7-56. PubMed ID: 12645605
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.