BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

232 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12739678)

  • 1. Class IV preparations for fractured anterior teeth restored with composite resin restorations.
    Eid H; White GE
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2003; 27(3):201-11. PubMed ID: 12739678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Retention of composite resin restorations in class IV preparations.
    Eid H
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2002; 26(3):251-6. PubMed ID: 11990047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Performance of techniques used for re-attachment of endodontically treated crown fractured teeth.
    Loguercio AD; Leski G; Sossmeier D; Kraul A; Oda M; Patzlaff RT; Reis A
    J Dent; 2008 Apr; 36(4):249-55. PubMed ID: 18308450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of enamel preparations on fracture resistance of composite resin buildup of fractures involving dentine in anterior bovine teeth: an in vitro study.
    Gandhi K; Nandlal B
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2006 Jun; 24(2):69-75. PubMed ID: 16823230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Re-attachment of anterior fractured teeth: fracture strength using different materials.
    Reis A; Kraul A; Francci C; de Assis TG; Crivelli DD; Oda M; Loguercio AD
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(6):621-7. PubMed ID: 12413229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reattachment of anterior fractured teeth: effect of materials and techniques on impact strength.
    Bruschi-Alonso RC; Alonso RC; Correr GM; Alves MC; Lewgoy HR; Sinhoreti MA; Puppin-Rontani RM; Correr-Sobrinho L
    Dent Traumatol; 2010 Aug; 26(4):315-22. PubMed ID: 20662884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Influence of cavity design on the biomechanics of direct composite resin restorations in Class IV preparations.
    Xu H; Jiang Z; Xiao X; Fu J; Su Q
    Eur J Oral Sci; 2012 Apr; 120(2):161-7. PubMed ID: 22409223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Newer Class I cavity preparation for permanent teeth using air abrasion and composite restoration.
    Ferdianakis K; White GE
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1999; 23(3):201-16. PubMed ID: 10686867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Re-attachment of anterior fractured teeth: fracture strength using different techniques.
    Reis A; Francci C; Loguercio AD; Carrilho MR; Rodriques Filho LE
    Oper Dent; 2001; 26(3):287-94. PubMed ID: 11357572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Fracture strength of tooth fragment reattachments with postpone bevel and overcontour reconstruction.
    Stellini E; Stomaci D; Stomaci M; Petrone N; Favero L
    Dent Traumatol; 2008 Jun; 24(3):283-8. PubMed ID: 18489478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An evaluation of various materials and tooth preparation designs used for reattachment of fractured incisors.
    Bhargava M; Pandit IK; Srivastava N; Gugnani N; Gupta M
    Dent Traumatol; 2010 Oct; 26(5):409-12. PubMed ID: 20831637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of fractured or sectioned fragments on the fracture strength of different reattachment techniques.
    Loguercio AD; Mengarda J; Amaral R; Kraul A; Reis A
    Oper Dent; 2004; 29(3):295-300. PubMed ID: 15195730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Fracture resistance of composite resin restorations and porcelain veneers in relation to residual tooth structure in fractured incisors.
    Batalocco G; Lee H; Ercoli C; Feng C; Malmstrom H
    Dent Traumatol; 2012 Feb; 28(1):75-80. PubMed ID: 21752192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Shear bond strength of restorations applied to un-complicated crown fractures: an in vitro study.
    Pamir T; Eden E; Sebahtin Ahmed S
    Dent Traumatol; 2012 Apr; 28(2):153-7. PubMed ID: 22051058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reattachment of fractured anterior teeth-determining fracture strength using different techniques: an in vitro study.
    Srilatha ; Joshi S; Chhasatia N; Rani PJ; Mathur E
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2012 Jan; 13(1):61-5. PubMed ID: 22430695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of chamfer design on load capacity of reattached incisors.
    Zhang L; Ye N; Aregawi WA; Fok A
    Dent Mater; 2021 Jul; 37(7):1168-1175. PubMed ID: 33966913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Margin designs and fracture resistance of incisal resin composite restorations.
    Tan DE; Tjan AH
    Am J Dent; 1992 Feb; 5(1):15-8. PubMed ID: 1524737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Class IV preparation design for microfilled and macrofilled composite resin.
    Donly KJ; Browning R
    Pediatr Dent; 1992; 14(1):34-6. PubMed ID: 1502113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. In vitro study comparing fracture strength recovery of teeth restored with three esthetic bonding materials using different techniques.
    Rajput A; Ataide I; Lambor R; Monteiro J; Tar M; Wadhawan N
    Eur J Esthet Dent; 2010; 5(4):398-411. PubMed ID: 21069110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Fracture resistance of tooth fragment reattachment: effects of different preparation techniques and adhesive materials.
    Pusman E; Cehreli ZC; Altay N; Unver B; Saracbasi O; Ozgun G
    Dent Traumatol; 2010 Feb; 26(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 20089057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.