262 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12739678)
21. Experimental evaluation of two methodologies for the restoration of crown fracture in permanent anterior teeth.
Stellini E; De Francesco M; Sivolella S; Ferro R; Denotti G; Oberholtzer D; Mazzoleni S
Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2012 Jun; 13(2):91-6. PubMed ID: 22762168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Tooth fragment reattachment through the use of a nanofilled composite resin.
Stellini E; Stomaci D; Zuccon A; Bressan E; Ferro R; Petrone N; Favero L; Mazzoleni S
Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2010 Jun; 11(2):77-81. PubMed ID: 20635841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Effect of two different restorative techniques using resin-based composites on microleakage.
Aranha AC; Pimenta LA
Am J Dent; 2004 Apr; 17(2):99-103. PubMed ID: 15151335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Effect of bulk-fill base material on fracture strength of root-filled teeth restored with laminate resin composite restorations.
Taha NA; Maghaireh GA; Ghannam AS; Palamara JE
J Dent; 2017 Aug; 63():60-64. PubMed ID: 28571830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Effect of novel restorative materials and retention slots on fracture resistance of endodontically-treated teeth.
Yasa B; Arslan H; Yasa E; Akcay M; Hatirli H
Acta Odontol Scand; 2016; 74(2):96-102. PubMed ID: 25982519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Direct composite resin restoration of an anterior tooth: effect of fiber-reinforced composite substructure.
Garoushi SK; Lassila LV; Vallittu PK
Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2007 Jun; 15(2):61-6. PubMed ID: 17645066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Shear bond strength evaluation of adhesive and tooth preparation combinations used in reattachment of fractured teeth: an ex-vivo study.
VamsiKrishna R; Madhusudhana K; Swaroopkumarreddy A; Lavanya A; Suneelkumar C; Kiranmayi G
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2015; 33(1):40-3. PubMed ID: 25572372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Fracture resistance of the buccal cusps of root filled maxillary premolar teeth restored with various techniques.
Siso SH; Hürmüzlü F; Turgut M; Altundaşar E; Serper A; Er K
Int Endod J; 2007 Mar; 40(3):161-8. PubMed ID: 17305692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Effects of Resin-modified Glass Ionomer Cement and Flowable Bulk-fill Base on the Fracture Resistance of Class II Restorations: An Original Laboratory Experimental Study.
Al-Nahedh HN
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2021 Apr; 22(4):342-348. PubMed ID: 34267000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Restoration of fractured and hypoplastic incisors by the acid etch resin technique: a three-year report.
Jordan RE; Suzuki M; Gwinnett AJ; Hunter JK
J Am Dent Assoc; 1977 Oct; 95(4):795-803. PubMed ID: 332748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Clinical Performance and Epidemiologic Aspects of Fractured Anterior Teeth Restored with a Composite Resin: A Two-Year Clinical Study.
Vural UK; Kiremitçi A; Gökalp S
J Prosthodont; 2019 Jan; 28(1):e204-e209. PubMed ID: 28960769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Fracture resistance of re-attached coronal fragments--influence of different adhesive materials and bevel preparation.
Demarco FF; Fay RM; Pinzon LM; Powers JM
Dent Traumatol; 2004 Jun; 20(3):157-63. PubMed ID: 15144447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Effect of preparation design on fracture strength of compromised molars restored with direct composite resin restorations: An in vitro and finite element analysis study.
Hofsteenge JW; Carvalho MA; Botenga ELF; Cune MS; Özcan M; Magne P; Gresnigt MMM
J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Jun; 131(6):1150-1158. PubMed ID: 38670907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Restoring the incisal edge.
Terry DA
N Y State Dent J; 2005; 71(5):30-5. PubMed ID: 16300251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Clinical performance of one shade universal composite resin and nanohybrid composite resin as full coronal esthetic restorations in primary maxillary incisors: A randomized controlled trial.
Zulekha ; Vinay C; Uloopi KS; RojaRamya KS; Penmatsa C; Ramesh MV
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2022; 40(2):159-164. PubMed ID: 35859408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Esthetic anterior composite resin restorations using a single shade: Step-by-step technique.
Romero MF
J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Jul; 114(1):9-12. PubMed ID: 25917855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Fracture resistance of teeth directly and indirectly restored with composite resin and indirectly restored with ceramic materials.
Dalpino PH; Francischone CE; Ishikiriama A; Franco EB
Am J Dent; 2002 Dec; 15(6):389-94. PubMed ID: 12691276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Fracture resistance of microhybrid composite, nano composite and fibre-reinforced composite used for incisal edge restoration.
Badakar CM; Shashibhushan KK; Naik NS; Reddy VV
Dent Traumatol; 2011 Jun; 27(3):225-9. PubMed ID: 21564519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The effect of fibre insertion on fracture resistance of root filled molar teeth with MOD preparations restored with composite.
Belli S; Erdemir A; Ozcopur M; Eskitascioglu G
Int Endod J; 2005 Feb; 38(2):73-80. PubMed ID: 15667628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Comparison of Enamel Preparations - Bevel, Chamfer and Stair Step Chamfer on Fracture Resistance of Nano Filled Resin Composites Using Bulk Pack Technique - An In Vitro Study.
Bommanagoudar J; Chandrashekhar S; Sharma S; Jain H
Open Access Maced J Med Sci; 2019 Dec; 7(23):4089-4093. PubMed ID: 32165958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
