218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12740536)
1. Mesh implants in hernia repair. Inflammatory cell response in a rat model.
Rosch R; Junge K; Schachtrupp A; Klinge U; Klosterhalfen B; Schumpelick V
Eur Surg Res; 2003; 35(3):161-6. PubMed ID: 12740536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Impact of polymer pore size on the interface scar formation in a rat model.
Klinge U; Klosterhalfen B; Birkenhauer V; Junge K; Conze J; Schumpelick V
J Surg Res; 2002 Apr; 103(2):208-14. PubMed ID: 11922736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Vypro II mesh in hernia repair: impact of polyglactin on long-term incorporation in rats.
Rosch R; Junge K; Quester R; Klinge U; Klosterhalfen B; Schumpelick V
Eur Surg Res; 2003; 35(5):445-50. PubMed ID: 12928603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Influence of polyglecaprone 25 (Monocryl) supplementation on the biocompatibility of a polypropylene mesh for hernia repair.
Junge K; Rosch R; Krones CJ; Klinge U; Mertens PR; Lynen P; Schumpelick V; Klosterhalfen B
Hernia; 2005 Oct; 9(3):212-7. PubMed ID: 15703859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. In vivo studies comparing the biocompatibility of various polypropylene meshes and their handling properties during endoscopic total extraperitoneal (TEP) patchplasty: an experimental study in pigs.
Scheidbach H; Tamme C; Tannapfel A; Lippert H; Köckerling F
Surg Endosc; 2004 Feb; 18(2):211-20. PubMed ID: 14691711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Titanium coating of a polypropylene mesh for hernia repair: effect on biocompatibilty.
Junge K; Rosch R; Klinge U; Saklak M; Klosterhalfen B; Peiper C; Schumpelick V
Hernia; 2005 May; 9(2):115-9. PubMed ID: 15583967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Functional and morphologic properties of a modified mesh for inguinal hernia repair.
Junge K; Klinge U; Rosch R; Klosterhalfen B; Schumpelick V
World J Surg; 2002 Dec; 26(12):1472-80. PubMed ID: 12297937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Introduction of polyethylene terephthalate mesh (KoSa hochfest) for abdominal hernia repair: an animal experimental study.
Zieren J; Neuss H; Paul M; Müller J
Biomed Mater Eng; 2004; 14(2):127-32. PubMed ID: 15156103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Functional and morphological evaluation of different polypropylene-mesh modifications for abdominal wall repair.
Klosterhalfen B; Klinge U; Schumpelick V
Biomaterials; 1998 Dec; 19(24):2235-46. PubMed ID: 9884036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Pore size and pore shape--but not mesh density--alter the mechanical strength of tissue ingrowth and host tissue response to synthetic mesh materials in a porcine model of ventral hernia repair.
Lake SP; Ray S; Zihni AM; Thompson DM; Gluckstein J; Deeken CR
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2015 Feb; 42():186-97. PubMed ID: 25486631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Interposition of polyglactin mesh does not prevent adhesion formation between viscera and polypropylene mesh.
de Vries Reilingh TS; van Goor H; Koppe MJ; Bodegom ME; Hendriks T; Bleichrodt RP
J Surg Res; 2007 Jun; 140(1):27-30. PubMed ID: 17481981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Modified mesh for hernia repair that is adapted to the physiology of the abdominal wall.
Klinge U; Klosterhalfen B; Conze J; Limberg W; Obolenski B; Ottinger AP; Schumpelick V
Eur J Surg; 1998 Dec; 164(12):951-60. PubMed ID: 10029391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Fibroplasia after polypropylene mesh implantation for abdominal wall hernia repair in rats.
Vaz M; Krebs RK; Trindade EN; Trindade MR
Acta Cir Bras; 2009; 24(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 19169537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparative study of Polypropylene versus Parietex composite®, Vicryl® and Ultrapro® meshes, regarding the formation of intraperitoneal adhesions.
Biondo-Simões ML; Carvalho LB; Conceição LT; Santos KB; Schiel WA; Arantes M; Silveira TD; Magri JC; Gomes FF
Acta Cir Bras; 2017 Feb; 32(2):98-107. PubMed ID: 28300876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Functional and morphological evaluation of a low-weight, monofilament polypropylene mesh for hernia repair.
Klinge U; Junge K; Stumpf M; AP AP; Klosterhalfen B
J Biomed Mater Res; 2002; 63(2):129-36. PubMed ID: 11870645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Experimental comparison of monofile light and heavy polypropylene meshes: less weight does not mean less biological response.
Weyhe D; Schmitz I; Belyaev O; Grabs R; Müller KM; Uhl W; Zumtobel V
World J Surg; 2006 Aug; 30(8):1586-91. PubMed ID: 16855805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Polypropylene and polypropylene/polyglecaprone (Ultrapro®) meshes in the repair of incisional hernia in rats.
Utiyama EM; Rosa MB; Andres Mde P; Miranda JS; Damous SH; Birolini CA; Damous LL; Montero EF
Acta Cir Bras; 2015 Jun; 30(6):376-81. PubMed ID: 26108024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparative evaluation of adhesion formation, strength of ingrowth, and textile properties of prosthetic meshes after long-term intra-abdominal implantation in a rabbit.
Novitsky YW; Harrell AG; Cristiano JA; Paton BL; Norton HJ; Peindl RD; Kercher KW; Heniford BT
J Surg Res; 2007 Jun; 140(1):6-11. PubMed ID: 17481980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Analysis of adhesion formation of a new elastic thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU) mesh in comparison to polypropylene (PP) meshes in IPOM position.
Lambertz A; van den Hil LCL; Schöb DS; Binnebösel M; Kroh A; Klinge U; Neumann UP; Klink CD
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2016 Jan; 53():366-372. PubMed ID: 26406584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of crosslinked and non-crosslinked biologic prostheses for abdominal hernia repair.
de Castro Brás LE; Shurey S; Sibbons PD
Hernia; 2012 Feb; 16(1):77-89. PubMed ID: 21805341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
