These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12741389)
1. Court-authorised caesarean sections--the end of a trend? Michalowski S Mod Law Rev; 1999 Jan; 62(1):115-27. PubMed ID: 12741389 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Contemporary transatlantic developments concerning compelled medical treatment of pregnant women. Rossiter GP Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 1995 May; 35(2):132-8. PubMed ID: 7677674 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Legal aspects of consent 11: compulsory Caesarean sections. Dimond B Br J Nurs; 2001 Aug 9-Sep 12; 10(15):1002-4. PubMed ID: 11923735 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Court-authorised caesareans: new guidance. Health Care Anal; 1997 Sep; 5(3):240-3. PubMed ID: 10184767 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparative analysis of the right of a pregnant woman to refuse medical treatment for herself and her viable fetus: the United States and United Kingdom. Glass BJ Indiana Int Comp Law Rev; 2001; 11(2):507-41. PubMed ID: 12680376 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Dissecting women, dissecting law: the court-ordering of caesarean section operations and the failure of informed consent to protect women of color. Espinoza LG Natl Black Law J; 1994; 13():211-37. PubMed ID: 11660478 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. After Re S. Thomson M Med Law Rev; 1994; 2(2):127-48. PubMed ID: 12159826 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Caesarean sections by court order. Brahams D Lancet; 1996 Sep; 348(9030):770. PubMed ID: 8813981 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Re Baby R: a comment on fetal apprehension. Dawson TB Can J Women Law; 1990; 4(1):265-75. PubMed ID: 11649295 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Beyond abortion: refusal of caesarean section. Mahowald M Bioethics; 1989 Apr; 3(2):106-21. PubMed ID: 11649241 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. In re A.C. District of Columbia. Court of Appeals, en banc Atl Report; 1990 Apr; 573():1235-64. PubMed ID: 11648191 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Refusal of emergency caesarean section in Ireland: a relational approach. Wade K Med Law Rev; 2014; 22(1):1-25. PubMed ID: 24255134 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Caesarean without maternal consent. Bewley S Bull Med Ethics; 1992 Dec; No. 84():2. PubMed ID: 11651572 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Forced cesarean sections: do the ends justify the means? Drigotas EE North Carol Law Rev; 1991 Nov; 70(1):297-321. PubMed ID: 11651652 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. An Orwellian scenario: court ordered caesarean section and women's autonomy. Cahill H Nurs Ethics; 1999 Nov; 6(6):494-505. PubMed ID: 10696195 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The judge in the delivery room: the emergence of court-ordered cesareans. Rhoden NK Calif Law Rev; 1986 Dec; 74(6):1951-2030. PubMed ID: 11658950 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]