These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12741410)

  • 1. Independent Institutional Review Boards.
    Forster D
    Seton Hall Law Rev; 2003; 32(3):513-23. PubMed ID: 12741410
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. NBAC recommendations on oversight of human subject research.
    Lo B; Groman M
    Seton Hall Law Rev; 2003; 32(3):493-512. PubMed ID: 12715803
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Recommendations for federal "super agency" would affect institutional review boards.
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 2001 Feb; 16(2):1-3. PubMed ID: 12530378
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Investigator, IRB and institutional financial conflicts in interest in human-subject research: past, present and future.
    Barnes M; Florencio PS
    Seton Hall Law Rev; 2003; 32(3):525-60. PubMed ID: 12741411
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Indecision over human pesticide data.
    Dove A
    Nat Med; 1999 Sep; 5(9):972. PubMed ID: 10471263
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Institutional review boards and financial conflicts of interest.
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 2002 Feb; 17(2):1-2. PubMed ID: 12374174
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Research involving children: regulations, review boards and reform.
    Gandhi R
    J Health Care Law Policy; 2005; 8(2):264-330. PubMed ID: 16471026
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Regulation of research on the decisionally impaired: history and gaps in the current regulatory system.
    Moreno JD
    J Health Care Law Policy; 1998; 1(1):1-21. PubMed ID: 15573427
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. In focus. The brief career of a government advisory committee: one members's perspective. The life and death of the National Human Research Protections Advisory Committee (NHRPAC).
    Moreno JD
    Am J Bioeth; 2002; 2(4):W23. PubMed ID: 12778944
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Medical research oversight from the corporate governance perspective: comparing institutional review boards and corporate boards.
    Saver RS
    William Mary Law Rev; 2004 Nov; 46(2):619-730. PubMed ID: 17167924
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Research subjects to be told about conflicts of interest.
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 2002 Feb; 17(2):3. PubMed ID: 12374175
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Law and public policy in human studies research.
    Mishkin B
    Perspect Biol Med; 2000; 43(3):362-72. PubMed ID: 10893725
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Institutional review boards (IRBs) failed to use steps to protect vulnerable research subjects.
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 2003 Jun; 18(6):6-7. PubMed ID: 15119342
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. One unified policy recommended for all human research studies.
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 2001 Oct; 16(10):1-2. PubMed ID: 11833569
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Regulation of research with children: the evolution from exclusion to inclusion.
    Alexander D
    J Health Care Law Policy; 2002; 6(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 15017949
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Universal protection for all human research participants.
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 2001 Jul; 16(7):1-2. PubMed ID: 11933953
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The role of institutional review boards in protecting human subjects: are we really ready to fix a broken system?
    Beh HG
    Law Psychol Rev; 2002; 26(1):1-47. PubMed ID: 16514756
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The National Bioethics Advisory Commission: bridging the gaps in human subjects research protection.
    Childress JF
    J Health Care Law Policy; 1998; 1(1):105-22. PubMed ID: 15573433
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bioethical malpractice: risk and responsibilities in human research.
    Noah BA
    J Health Care Law Policy; 2004; 7(2):175-241. PubMed ID: 15573441
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Children as research subjects: a proposal to revise the current federal regulations using a moral framework.
    Ross LF
    Stanford Law Pol Rev; 1997; 8(1):159-76. PubMed ID: 16528858
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.