These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
305 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12741446)
1. Validity of the general practice research database. Jick SS; Kaye JA; Vasilakis-Scaramozza C; Garcia Rodríguez LA; Ruigómez A; Meier CR; Schlienger RG; Black C; Jick H Pharmacotherapy; 2003 May; 23(5):686-9. PubMed ID: 12741446 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Validity of diagnostic coding within the General Practice Research Database: a systematic review. Khan NF; Harrison SE; Rose PW Br J Gen Pract; 2010 Mar; 60(572):e128-36. PubMed ID: 20202356 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparison of the recording of 30 common childhood conditions in the Doctor's Independent Network and General Practice Research Databases. De Wilde S; Carey IM; Bremner SA; Richards N; Hilton SR; Strachan DP; Cook DG Health Stat Q; 2004; (22):21-31. PubMed ID: 15704391 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The general practice research database: role in pharmacovigilance. Wood L; Martinez C Drug Saf; 2004; 27(12):871-81. PubMed ID: 15366975 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Revitalizing the General Practice Research Database: plans, challenges, and opportunities. Wood L; Coulson R Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2001; 10(5):379-83. PubMed ID: 11802580 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Validation studies of the health improvement network (THIN) database for pharmacoepidemiology research. Lewis JD; Schinnar R; Bilker WB; Wang X; Strom BL Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2007 Apr; 16(4):393-401. PubMed ID: 17066486 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Implications of the problem orientated medical record (POMR) for research using electronic GP databases: a comparison of the Doctors Independent Network Database (DIN) and the General Practice Research Database (GPRD). Carey IM; Cook DG; De Wilde S; Bremner SA; Richards N; Caine S; Strachan DP; Hilton SR BMC Fam Pract; 2003 Sep; 4():14. PubMed ID: 14516473 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The UK General Practice Research Database. Walley T; Mantgani A Lancet; 1997 Oct; 350(9084):1097-9. PubMed ID: 10213569 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The use of general practice consultation databases in rheumatology research. Jordan K; Porcheret M; Kadam UT; Croft P Rheumatology (Oxford); 2006 Feb; 45(2):126-8. PubMed ID: 16368726 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Use of the UK General Practice Research Database for pharmacoepidemiology. García Rodríguez LA; Pérez Gutthann S Br J Clin Pharmacol; 1998 May; 45(5):419-25. PubMed ID: 9643612 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Strategies for identifying pregnancies in the automated medical records of the General Practice Research Database. Hardy JR; Holford TR; Hall GC; Bracken MB Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2004 Nov; 13(11):749-59. PubMed ID: 15386720 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The General Practice Research Database: quality of morbidity data. Hollowell J Popul Trends; 1997; (87):36-40. PubMed ID: 9134574 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Simulation of the Syst-Eur randomized control trial using a primary care electronic medical record was feasible. Tannen RL; Weiner MG; Marcus SM J Clin Epidemiol; 2006 Mar; 59(3):254-64. PubMed ID: 16488356 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The relationship between time since registration and measured incidence rates in the General Practice Research Database. Lewis JD; Bilker WB; Weinstein RB; Strom BL Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2005 Jul; 14(7):443-51. PubMed ID: 15898131 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of the General Practice Research Database congenital heart defects prevalence: comparison to United Kingdom national systems. Wurst KE; Ephross SA; Loehr J; Clark DW; Guess HA Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol; 2007 Apr; 79(4):309-16. PubMed ID: 17286297 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The incidence of breast cancer in the General Practice Research Database compared with national cancer registration data. Kaye JA; Derby LE; del Mar Melero-Montes M; Quinn M; Jick H Br J Cancer; 2000 Dec; 83(11):1556-8. PubMed ID: 11076668 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Validation of the diagnosis of venous thromboembolism in general practice database studies. Lawrenson R; Todd JC; Leydon GM; Williams TJ; Farmer RD Br J Clin Pharmacol; 2000 Jun; 49(6):591-6. PubMed ID: 10848723 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Use of computerised general practice data for population surveillance: comparative study of influenza data. Johnson N; Mant D; Jones L; Randall T BMJ; 1991 Mar; 302(6779):763-5. PubMed ID: 2021767 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The identification of pregnancies within the general practice research database. Devine S; West S; Andrews E; Tennis P; Hammad TA; Eaton S; Thorp J; Olshan A Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2010 Jan; 19(1):45-50. PubMed ID: 19823973 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Data resources for investigating drug exposure during pregnancy and associated outcomes: the General Practice Research Database (GPRD) as an alternative to pregnancy registries. Charlton RA; Cunnington MC; de Vries CS; Weil JG Drug Saf; 2008; 31(1):39-51. PubMed ID: 18095745 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]