These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12741673)

  • 1. Information criteria for pairwise comparisons.
    Dayton CM
    Psychol Methods; 2003 Mar; 8(1):61-71. PubMed ID: 12741673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reliability of multiple-component measuring instruments: improved evaluation in repeated measure designs.
    Raykov T
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2007 May; 60(Pt 1):119-36. PubMed ID: 17535583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Estimation of maximal reliability for multiple-component instruments in multilevel designs.
    Raykov T; Penev S
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2009 Feb; 62(Pt 1):129-42. PubMed ID: 18001517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Identifying between-person and within-person factors to enhance understanding of observed score profiles.
    Kim SK
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2013 Nov; 66(3):435-51. PubMed ID: 23020157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Diagnosing item score patterns on a test using item response theory-based person-fit statistics.
    Meijer RR
    Psychol Methods; 2003 Mar; 8(1):72-87. PubMed ID: 12741674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Estimating the reliability of a test split into two parts of equal or unequal length.
    Feldt LS; Charter RA
    Psychol Methods; 2003 Mar; 8(1):102-9. PubMed ID: 12741676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Testing equivalence with repeated measures: tests of the difference model of two-alternative forced-choice performance.
    García-Pérez MA; Alcalá-Quintana R
    Span J Psychol; 2011 Nov; 14(2):1023-49. PubMed ID: 22059346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A method for testing group differences of scale validity in multiple population studies.
    Raykov T
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2005 May; 58(Pt 1):173-84. PubMed ID: 15969845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Testing hypotheses involving Cronbach's alpha using marginal models.
    Kuijpers RE; van der Ark LA; Croon MA
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2013 Nov; 66(3):503-20. PubMed ID: 23663052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Bootstrap standard error and confidence intervals for the correlation corrected for range restriction: a simulation study.
    Chan W; Chan DW
    Psychol Methods; 2004 Sep; 9(3):369-85. PubMed ID: 15355154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Three-mode analysis of multimode covariance matrices.
    Kroonenberg PM; Oort FJ
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2003 Nov; 56(Pt 2):305-35. PubMed ID: 14633338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An overview of adapting educational and psychological assessment instruments: past and present.
    Merenda PF
    Psychol Rep; 2006 Oct; 99(2):307-14. PubMed ID: 17153798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Stereotype threat research and the assumptions underlying analysis of covariance.
    Wicherts JM
    Am Psychol; 2005 Apr; 60(3):267-9; discussion 271-2. PubMed ID: 15796690
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. On specifying the null model for incremental fit indices in structural equation modeling.
    Widaman KF; Thompson JS
    Psychol Methods; 2003 Mar; 8(1):16-37. PubMed ID: 12741671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Gender differences in variance and means on the Naglieri Non-verbal Ability Test: data from the Philippines.
    Vista A; Care E
    Br J Educ Psychol; 2011 Jun; 81(Pt 2):292-308. PubMed ID: 21542820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Performance of the likelihood ratio difference (G2 Diff) test for detecting unidimensionality in applications of the multidimensional Rasch model.
    Harrell-Williams L; Wolfe EW
    J Appl Meas; 2014; 15(3):267-75. PubMed ID: 24992250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The maximum priority index method for severely constrained item selection in computerized adaptive testing.
    Cheng Y; Chang HH
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2009 May; 62(Pt 2):369-83. PubMed ID: 18534047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An effect size index for comparing two independent alpha coefficients.
    Liu HY; Weng LJ
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2009 May; 62(Pt 2):385-400. PubMed ID: 18573226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Proportion of third-level variation in multi-level studies: A note on an interval estimation procedure.
    Raykov T
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2010 May; 63(Pt 2):417-26. PubMed ID: 19793411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Relations among scores on Matrix Analogies Test, Draw-A-Person, and the Iowa Tests of basic skills for low socioeconomic children.
    Haddad FA; Juliano JM
    Psychol Rep; 1991 Aug; 69(1):299-302. PubMed ID: 1961812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.