287 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12742025)
21. Can a physics-based, all-atom potential find a protein's native structure among misfolded structures? I. Large scale AMBER benchmarking.
Wroblewska L; Skolnick J
J Comput Chem; 2007 Sep; 28(12):2059-66. PubMed ID: 17407093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Entropy reduction effect imposed by hydrogen bond formation on protein folding cooperativity: evidence from a hydrophobic minimalist model.
Barbosa MA; Garcia LG; Pereira de Araújo AF
Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2005 Nov; 72(5 Pt 1):051903. PubMed ID: 16383641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Fold helical proteins by energy minimization in dihedral space and a DFIRE-based statistical energy function.
Li H; Zhou Y
J Bioinform Comput Biol; 2005 Oct; 3(5):1151-70. PubMed ID: 16278952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. A new pairwise folding potential based on improved decoy generation and side-chain packing.
Loose C; Klepeis JL; Floudas CA
Proteins; 2004 Feb; 54(2):303-14. PubMed ID: 14696192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Identifying native-like protein structures with scoring functions based on all-atom ECEPP force fields, implicit solvent models and structure relaxation.
Arnautova YA; Vorobjev YN; Vila JA; Scheraga HA
Proteins; 2009 Oct; 77(1):38-51. PubMed ID: 19384995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Conformation spaces of proteins.
Sullivan DC; Kuntz ID
Proteins; 2001 Mar; 42(4):495-511. PubMed ID: 11170204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Examining a Thermodynamic Order Parameter of Protein Folding.
Chong SH; Ham S
Sci Rep; 2018 May; 8(1):7148. PubMed ID: 29740018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Discriminate protein decoys from native by using a scoring function based on ubiquitous Phi and Psi angles computed for all atom.
Mishra A; Iqbal S; Hoque MT
J Theor Biol; 2016 Jun; 398():112-21. PubMed ID: 27029514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Optimized distance-dependent atom-pair-based potential DOOP for protein structure prediction.
Chae MH; Krull F; Knapp EW
Proteins; 2015 May; 83(5):881-90. PubMed ID: 25693513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Decoy selection for protein structure prediction via extreme gradient boosting and ranking.
Akhter N; Chennupati G; Djidjev H; Shehu A
BMC Bioinformatics; 2020 Dec; 21(Suppl 1):189. PubMed ID: 33297949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Progress in protein-protein docking: atomic resolution predictions in the CAPRI experiment using RosettaDock with an improved treatment of side-chain flexibility.
Schueler-Furman O; Wang C; Baker D
Proteins; 2005 Aug; 60(2):187-94. PubMed ID: 15981249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Conformational Sampling of a Biomolecular Rugged Energy Landscape.
Rydzewski J; Jakubowski R; Nicosia G; Nowak W
IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2018; 15(3):732-739. PubMed ID: 27913358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. A critical analysis of continuum electrostatics: the screened Coulomb potential--implicit solvent model and the study of the alanine dipeptide and discrimination of misfolded structures of proteins.
Hassan SA; Mehler EL
Proteins; 2002 Apr; 47(1):45-61. PubMed ID: 11870864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Discrimination between native and intentionally misfolded conformations of proteins: ES/IS, a new method for calculating conformational free energy that uses both dynamics simulations with an explicit solvent and an implicit solvent continuum model.
Vorobjev YN; Almagro JC; Hermans J
Proteins; 1998 Sep; 32(4):399-413. PubMed ID: 9726412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Constructing effective energy functions for protein structure prediction through broadening attraction-basin and reverse Monte Carlo sampling.
Wang C; Wei Y; Zhang H; Kong L; Sun S; Zheng WM; Bu D
BMC Bioinformatics; 2019 Mar; 20(Suppl 3):135. PubMed ID: 30925867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Empirical potential function for simplified protein models: combining contact and local sequence-structure descriptors.
Zhang J; Chen R; Liang J
Proteins; 2006 Jun; 63(4):949-60. PubMed ID: 16477624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Prediction of protein structure by simulating coarse-grained folding pathways: a preliminary report.
Colubri A
J Biomol Struct Dyn; 2004 Apr; 21(5):625-38. PubMed ID: 14769055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. A minima hopping study of all-atom protein folding and structure prediction.
Roy S; Goedecker S; Field MJ; Penev E
J Phys Chem B; 2009 May; 113(20):7315-21. PubMed ID: 19391598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Enhanced sampling near the native conformation using statistical potentials for local side-chain and backbone interactions.
Fang Q; Shortle D
Proteins; 2005 Jul; 60(1):97-102. PubMed ID: 15852306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Determination of the conformation of folding initiation sites in proteins by computer simulation.
Avbelj F; Moult J
Proteins; 1995 Oct; 23(2):129-41. PubMed ID: 8592695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
