233 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12742438)
1. A 6-year clinical evaluation of Class I poly-acid modified resin composite/resin composite laminate restorations cured with a two-step curing technique.
van Dijken JW
Dent Mater; 2003 Jul; 19(5):423-8. PubMed ID: 12742438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Durability of resin composite restorations in high C-factor cavities: a 12-year follow-up.
van Dijken JW
J Dent; 2010 Jun; 38(6):469-74. PubMed ID: 20193727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. 3-year evaluation of a new open sandwich technique in Class II cavities.
Lindberg A; van Dijken JW; Lindberg M
Am J Dent; 2003 Feb; 16(1):33-6. PubMed ID: 12744410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Nine-year evaluation of a polyacid-modified resin composite/resin composite open sandwich technique in Class II cavities.
Lindberg A; van Dijken JW; Lindberg M
J Dent; 2007 Feb; 35(2):124-9. PubMed ID: 16956709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Interfacial adaptation of a Class II polyacid-modified resin composite/resin composite laminate restoration in vivo.
Lindberg A; van Dijken JW; Hörstedt P
Acta Odontol Scand; 2000 Apr; 58(2):77-84. PubMed ID: 10894429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A 15-year randomized controlled study of a reduced shrinkage stress resin composite.
van Dijken JW; Lindberg A
Dent Mater; 2015 Sep; 31(9):1150-8. PubMed ID: 26205382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Durability of new restorative materials in Class III cavities.
van Dijken JW
J Adhes Dent; 2001; 3(1):65-70. PubMed ID: 11317385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Direct resin composite inlays/onlays: an 11 year follow-up.
van Dijken JW
J Dent; 2000 Jul; 28(5):299-306. PubMed ID: 10785294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical effectiveness of a low-shrinkage resin composite: a five-year evaluation.
van Dijken JW; Lindberg A
J Adhes Dent; 2009 Apr; 11(2):143-8. PubMed ID: 19492716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Marginal adaptation of direct composite and sandwich restorations in Class II cavities with cervical margins in dentine.
Dietrich T; Lösche AC; Lösche GM; Roulet JF
J Dent; 1999 Feb; 27(2):119-28. PubMed ID: 10071469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. 3-year clinical evaluation of a compomer, a resin-modified glass ionomer and a resin composite in Class III restorations.
van Dijken JW
Am J Dent; 1996 Oct; 9(5):195-8. PubMed ID: 9545903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessment of laminate technique using glass ionomer and resin composite for restoration of root filled teeth.
Taha NA; Palamara JE; Messer HH
J Dent; 2012 Aug; 40(8):617-23. PubMed ID: 22521705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A randomized controlled 27 years follow up of three resin composites in Class II restorations.
Pallesen U; van Dijken JW
J Dent; 2015 Dec; 43(12):1547-58. PubMed ID: 26363442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparative clinical evaluation of different treatment approaches using a microfilled resin composite and a compomer in Class III cavities: two-year results.
Demirci M; Yildiz E; Uysal O
Oper Dent; 2008; 33(1):7-14. PubMed ID: 18335727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A randomized controlled 30 years follow up of three conventional resin composites in Class II restorations.
Pallesen U; van Dijken JW
Dent Mater; 2015 Oct; 31(10):1232-44. PubMed ID: 26321155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Direct resin composite restorations versus indirect composite inlays: one-year results.
Mendonça JS; Neto RG; Santiago SL; Lauris JR; Navarro MF; de Carvalho RM
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2010 May; 11(3):025-32. PubMed ID: 20461321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Marginal adaption of Class V restorations with and without "softstart-polymerization".
Friedl KH; Schmalz G; Hiller KA; Märkl A
Oper Dent; 2000; 25(1):26-32. PubMed ID: 11203787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Marginal quality of posterior microhybrid resin composite restorations applied using two polymerisation protocols: 5-year randomised split mouth trial.
Barabanti N; Gagliani M; Roulet JF; Testori T; Ozcan M; Cerutti A
J Dent; 2013 May; 41(5):436-42. PubMed ID: 23454329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of low-elastic modulus liner and base as stress-absorbing layer in composite resin restorations.
Oliveira LC; Duarte S; Araujo CA; Abrahão A
Dent Mater; 2010 Mar; 26(3):e159-69. PubMed ID: 20031198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. One-year retrospective clinical evaluation of hybrid composite restorations placed in United Kingdom general practices.
Burke FJ; Crisp RJ; Bell TJ; Healy A; Mark B; McBirnie R; Osborne-Smith KL
Quintessence Int; 2001 Apr; 32(4):293-8. PubMed ID: 12066649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
