BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12742919)

  • 1. Lundbeck broke advertising rules.
    Dyer O
    BMJ; 2003 May; 326(7397):1004. PubMed ID: 12742919
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Drug industry's new code criticised for lacking teeth.
    Coombes R
    BMJ; 2005 Nov; 331(7527):1225. PubMed ID: 16308367
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Complaints about advertising of medicines are encouraged.
    Simmonds H
    BMJ; 2002 Apr; 324(7341):850-1. PubMed ID: 11934787
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Rules of conduct and the pharmaceutical industry.
    Collier J
    Lancet; 1984 Feb; 1(8374):453. PubMed ID: 6142179
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Enforcement of codes governing pharmaceutical promotion: what happens when companies breach advertising guidelines?
    Lexchin J
    CMAJ; 1997 Feb; 156(3):351-6. PubMed ID: 9033415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Voluntary self-regulatory codes: what should we expect?
    Lexchin J
    Am J Bioeth; 2003; 3(3):49-50. PubMed ID: 14594491
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. US drug industry's guidelines on advertising too limited, say critics.
    Burton B
    BMJ; 2005 Aug; 331(7514):420. PubMed ID: 16110059
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Ethical code of the pharmaceutical industry in Slovakia. (Excerpts).
    Med Etika Bioet; 2004; 11(3-4):11-22. PubMed ID: 16294449
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. From the Food and Drug Administration.
    Nightingale SL
    JAMA; 1998 Mar; 279(9):645. PubMed ID: 9496968
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Masked emotions and depressions].
    Zahle V
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1970 Dec; 132(49):2355-7. PubMed ID: 5530668
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. New DTC guidelines please drug companies, anger critics.
    Med Health; 2005 Aug; 59(27):5-6. PubMed ID: 16111080
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Can drug companies have it both ways?
    Rapp MS
    CMAJ; 1997 Apr; 156(7):982-3. PubMed ID: 9099165
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The winner takes it all.
    Walsh K
    J Med Ethics; 2005 May; 31(5):267. PubMed ID: 15863682
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Student rally. Med school attendees write ethics code on drug firms.
    Romano M
    Mod Healthc; 2002 May; 32(19):24, 26. PubMed ID: 12038157
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Rules of conduct and the pharmaceutical industry.
    Cox P
    Lancet; 1984 Mar; 1(8375):517. PubMed ID: 6142245
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Practice advisory: participation of neurologists in direct-to-consumer advertising.
    Ethics, Law and Humanities Committee of the American Academy of Neurology
    Neurology; 2001 Apr; 56(8):995-6. PubMed ID: 11320169
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Drug advertising.
    Med J Aust; 1987 Jun; 146(12):660-1. PubMed ID: 3626920
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Unpublished data in drug advertisements.
    Massam D
    BMJ; 1993 Apr; 306(6885):1127. PubMed ID: 8495176
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. AAFP supports improvement, not ban, on direct-to-consumer prescription drug ads.
    Kellerman R;
    Ann Fam Med; 2007; 5(2):180-1. PubMed ID: 17389544
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. UK watchdog investigates promotional children's book.
    Pincock S
    Lancet; 2003 Aug; 362(9384):625. PubMed ID: 12947945
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.