These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

565 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12744407)

  • 1. Fatigue behavior of the resin-resin bond of partially replaced resin-based composite restorations.
    Frankenberger R; Krämer N; Ebert J; Lohbauer U; Käppel S; ten Weges S; Petschelt A
    Am J Dent; 2003 Feb; 16(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 12744407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dentin bond strength and marginal adaptation: direct composite resins vs ceramic inlays.
    Frankenberger R; Sindel J; Krämer N; Petschelt A
    Oper Dent; 1999; 24(3):147-55. PubMed ID: 10530276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of shear and tensile bond strength between dentin and ceramics using dual-polymerizing resin cements.
    Pekkan G; Hekimoglu C
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Oct; 102(4):242-52. PubMed ID: 19782827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Marginal adaptation and microtensile bond strength of composite indirect restorations bonded to dentin treated with adhesive and low-viscosity composite.
    de Andrade OS; de Goes MF; Montes MA
    Dent Mater; 2007 Mar; 23(3):279-87. PubMed ID: 16546249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Resin bond strength and micromorphology of human teeth prepared with an Erbium:YAG laser.
    Trajtenberg CP; Pereira PN; Powers JM
    Am J Dent; 2004 Oct; 17(5):331-6. PubMed ID: 15575443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of zirconium-oxide ceramic surface treatments on the bond strength to adhesive resin.
    Atsu SS; Kilicarslan MA; Kucukesmen HC; Aka PS
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Jun; 95(6):430-6. PubMed ID: 16765155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Microtensile bond strengths to cavity floor dentin in indirect composite restorations using resin coating.
    Okuda M; Nikaido T; Maruoka R; Foxton RM; Tagami J
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2007; 19(1):38-46; discussion 47-8. PubMed ID: 17244149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Influence of different surface treatments on the short-term bond strength and durability between a zirconia post and a composite resin core material.
    Akgungor G; Sen D; Aydin M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 May; 99(5):388-99. PubMed ID: 18456050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of conditioner and restorative resin on enamel bond strengths.
    Perdigão J; Geraldeli S; Heymann HO; Rosa BT
    Am J Dent; 2000 Apr; 13(2):88-92. PubMed ID: 11764833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of flowable resin on bond strength and gap formation in Class I restorations.
    Miguez PA; Pereira PN; Foxton RM; Walter R; Nunes MF; Swift EJ
    Dent Mater; 2004 Nov; 20(9):839-45. PubMed ID: 15451239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Class II composite resin restorations with two polymerization techniques: relationship between microtensile bond strength and marginal leakage.
    Cenci M; Demarco F; de Carvalho R
    J Dent; 2005 Aug; 33(7):603-10. PubMed ID: 16005800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of silica coating and silanization on flexural and composite-resin bond strengths of zirconia posts: An in vitro study.
    Xible AA; de Jesus Tavarez RR; de Araujo Cdos R; Bonachela WC
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Mar; 95(3):224-9. PubMed ID: 16543020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Influence of post-etching cleaning and connecting porcelain on the microtensile bond strength of composite resin to feldspathic porcelain.
    Magne P; Cascione D
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Nov; 96(5):354-61. PubMed ID: 17098499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The marginal seal of Class II restorations: flowable composite resin compared to injectable glass ionomer.
    Payne JH
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1999; 23(2):123-30. PubMed ID: 10204453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated molars restored with extensive composite resin restorations.
    Plotino G; Buono L; Grande NM; Lamorgese V; Somma F
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Mar; 99(3):225-32. PubMed ID: 18319094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of surface conditioning on the retentive bond strengths of fiberreinforced composite posts.
    Schmage P; Cakir FY; Nergiz I; Pfeiffer P
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Dec; 102(6):368-77. PubMed ID: 19961995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of fibre insertion on fracture resistance of root filled molar teeth with MOD preparations restored with composite.
    Belli S; Erdemir A; Ozcopur M; Eskitascioglu G
    Int Endod J; 2005 Feb; 38(2):73-80. PubMed ID: 15667628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Initial repair bond strength of a nano-filled hybrid resin: effect of surface treatments and bonding agents.
    Yesilyurt C; Kusgoz A; Bayram M; Ulker M
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2009; 21(4):251-60. PubMed ID: 19689724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Direct dentin bonding technique sensitivity when using air/suction drying steps.
    Magne P; Mahallati R; Bazos P; So WS
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2008; 20(2):130-8; discussion 139-40. PubMed ID: 18380845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of layering techniques on the micro-tensile bond strength to dentin in resin composite restorations.
    Niu Y; Ma X; Fan M; Zhu S
    Dent Mater; 2009 Jan; 25(1):129-34. PubMed ID: 18614225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 29.