119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12745428)
1. On the effects of cyclic transversal forces on osseointegrated dental implants: experimental and finite element shakedown analyses.
Genna F
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2003 Apr; 6(2):141-52. PubMed ID: 12745428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of a thin HA coating on the stress/strain distribution in bone around dental implants using three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Aoki H; Ozeki K; Ohtani Y; Fukui Y; Asaoka T
Biomed Mater Eng; 2006; 16(3):157-69. PubMed ID: 16518015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Mechanical response of bone under short-term loading of a dental implant with an internal layer simulating the nonlinear behaviour of the periodontal ligament.
Genna F; Paganelli C; Salgarello S; Sapelli P
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2003; 6(5-6):305-18. PubMed ID: 14675951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Application of finite element analysis in implant dentistry: a review of the literature.
Geng JP; Tan KB; Liu GR
J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Jun; 85(6):585-98. PubMed ID: 11404759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Influence of implant design and bone quality on stress/strain distribution in bone around implants: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
Tada S; Stegaroiu R; Kitamura E; Miyakawa O; Kusakari H
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(3):357-68. PubMed ID: 12814310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The dynamic natures of implant loading.
Wang RF; Kang B; Lang LA; Razzoog ME
J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Jun; 101(6):359-71. PubMed ID: 19463663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The influence of implant diameter and length on stress distribution of osseointegrated implants related to crestal bone geometry: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Baggi L; Cappelloni I; Di Girolamo M; Maceri F; Vairo G
J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Dec; 100(6):422-31. PubMed ID: 19033026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Three-dimensional finite element stress analysis of a cuneiform-geometry implant.
Cruz M; Wassall T; Toledo EM; Barra LP; Lemonge AC
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(5):675-84. PubMed ID: 14579955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Three-dimensional numerical simulation of dental implants as orthodontic anchorage.
Gallas MM; Abeleira MT; Fernández JR; Burguera M
Eur J Orthod; 2005 Feb; 27(1):12-6. PubMed ID: 15743858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Simulation of impact test for determining "health" of percutaneous bone anchored implants.
Jones S; Faulkner G; Raboud D; Fyfe K; Wolfaardt J
J Biomech Eng; 2006 Oct; 128(5):647-53. PubMed ID: 16995750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The effect of fixture neck design in a realistic model of dental implant: a finite element approach.
Necchi S; Migliavacca F; Gastaldi D; Pizzagalli M; Del Fabbro M; Weinstein R; Pietrabissa R; Dubini G
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2003; 6(5-6):289-97. PubMed ID: 14675949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The staggered installation of dental implants and its effect on bone stresses.
Abu-Hammad O; Khraisat A; Dar-Odeh N; Jagger DC; Hammerle CH
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2007 Sep; 9(3):121-7. PubMed ID: 17716255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparative analysis based on different strength criteria for evaluation of risk factor for dental implants.
Natali AN; Pavan PG
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2002 Apr; 5(2):127-33. PubMed ID: 12186722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Biomechanical aspects of marginal bone resorption around osseointegrated implants: considerations based on a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Kitamura E; Stegaroiu R; Nomura S; Miyakawa O
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2004 Aug; 15(4):401-12. PubMed ID: 15248874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Probabilistic analysis of preload in the abutment screw of a dental implant complex.
Guda T; Ross TA; Lang LA; Millwater HR
J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Sep; 100(3):183-93. PubMed ID: 18762030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Syncrystallization: a technique for temporization of immediately loaded implants with metal-reinforced acrylic resin restorations.
Degidi M; Gehrke P; Spanel A; Piattelli A
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2006; 8(3):123-34. PubMed ID: 16919020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Biomechanical analysis on platform switching: is there any biomechanical rationale?
Maeda Y; Miura J; Taki I; Sogo M
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Oct; 18(5):581-4. PubMed ID: 17608737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Finite element analysis of stress-breaking attachments on maxillary implant-retained overdentures.
Tanino F; Hayakawa I; Hirano S; Minakuchi S
Int J Prosthodont; 2007; 20(2):193-8. PubMed ID: 17455444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Finite element analysis of effect of prosthesis height, angle of force application, and implant offset on supporting bone.
Sütpideler M; Eckert SE; Zobitz M; An KN
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(6):819-25. PubMed ID: 15623056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Threaded versus porous-surfaced implants as anchorage units for orthodontic treatment: three-dimensional finite element analysis of peri-implant bone tissue stresses.
Pilliar RM; Sagals G; Meguid SA; Oyonarte R; Deporter DA
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(6):879-89. PubMed ID: 17190297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
