These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

54 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12745835)

  • 1. Retrieval independence in successive recognition tasks.
    Glass AL; Lian A; Helstrup T
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2003 May; 56(4):657-84. PubMed ID: 12745835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Retrieval independence between parts and wholes in successive recognition tasks.
    Glass AL; Lian A; Buyske S
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2006 Jan; 59(1):136-49. PubMed ID: 16556563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Does recognition of single words predict recognition of two?
    Greene RL; Klein AA
    Am J Psychol; 2004; 117(2):215-27. PubMed ID: 15209370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Re-exposure to studied items at test does not influence false recognition.
    Dodd MD; Sheard ED; MacLeod CM
    Memory; 2006 Jan; 14(1):115-26. PubMed ID: 16423748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Parallel memory retrieval in dual-task situations: II. Episodic memory.
    Logan GD; Delheimer JA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2001 May; 27(3):668-85. PubMed ID: 11394673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of study list composition on the word frequency effect and metacognitive attributions in recognition memory.
    Higham PA; Bruno D; Perfect TJ
    Memory; 2010 Nov; 18(8):883-99. PubMed ID: 21108107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of repeated collaborative retrieval on individual memory vary as a function of recall versus recognition tasks.
    Blumen HM; Rajaram S
    Memory; 2009 Nov; 17(8):840-6. PubMed ID: 19882435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Experimental manipulation of prior experience: Effects on item and associative recognition.
    Chalmers KA; Humphreys MS
    Memory; 2003 May; 11(3):233-46. PubMed ID: 12908673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Context effects in recognition memory: the role of familiarity and recollection.
    McKenzie WA; Tiberghien G
    Conscious Cogn; 2004 Mar; 13(1):20-38. PubMed ID: 14990238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. On the nature of associative information in recognition memory.
    Kelley R; Wixted JT
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2001 May; 27(3):701-22. PubMed ID: 11394675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Implicit word activation during pre-recognition processing influences correct recognition and estimates of presentation frequency.
    Amberg MD; Yamashita JA; Wallace WP
    Memory; 2004 Mar; 12(2):129-39. PubMed ID: 15250178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The long-term recency effect in recognition memory.
    Talmi D; Goshen-Gottstein Y
    Memory; 2006 May; 14(4):424-36. PubMed ID: 16766446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Retrieval-induced forgetting in a category recognition task.
    Spitzer B; Bäuml KH
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Jan; 35(1):286-91. PubMed ID: 19210100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The TECO theory and lawful dependency in successive episodic memory tests.
    Sikström S
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2000 Aug; 53(3):693-728. PubMed ID: 10994226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. False recognition following study of semantically related lists presented in jumbled word form.
    Halcomb SH; Taylor JP; DeSouza KD; Wallace WP
    Memory; 2008 May; 16(4):443-61. PubMed ID: 18432488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Hypermnesia occurs in recall but not in recognition.
    Payne DG; Roediger HL
    Am J Psychol; 1987; 100(2):145-65. PubMed ID: 3618837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The difference between implicit and explicit associative processes at study in creating false memory in the DRM paradigm.
    Kawasaki Y; Yama H
    Memory; 2006 Jan; 14(1):68-78. PubMed ID: 16423743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Increased bilateral occipitoparietal activity during retention of binary versus unary indexed lists in pair recognition.
    Phillips S; Niki K
    Neuroimage; 2003 Oct; 20(2):1226-35. PubMed ID: 14568491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The spacing effect depends on an encoding deficit, retrieval, and time in working memory: evidence from once-presented words.
    Braun K; Rubin DC
    Memory; 1998 Jan; 6(1):37-65. PubMed ID: 9640432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Automatic retrieval of new associations under shallow encoding conditions.
    Reingold EM; Goshen-Gottstein Y
    Conscious Cogn; 1996; 5(1-2):117-30. PubMed ID: 8733926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.