These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12745841)

  • 41. Influence of neighborhood size and exposure duration on visual-word recognition: evidence with the yes/no and the go/no-go lexical decision tasks.
    Perea M; Rosa E; Gómez C
    Percept Psychophys; 2003 Feb; 65(2):273-86. PubMed ID: 12713243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Transposed-letter and laterality effects in lexical decision.
    Perea M; Fraga I
    Brain Lang; 2006 Apr; 97(1):102-9. PubMed ID: 16183108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Sentence context modulates visual word recognition and translation in bilinguals.
    van Hell JG; de Groot AM
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Jul; 128(3):431-51. PubMed ID: 18486085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Evaluating a split fovea model of visual word recognition: effects of case alternation in the two visual fields and in the left and right halves of words presented at the fovea.
    Ellis AW; Brooks J; Lavidor M
    Neuropsychologia; 2005; 43(8):1128-37. PubMed ID: 15817170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. How does interhemispheric communication in visual word recognition work? Deciding between early and late integration accounts of the split fovea theory.
    Van der Haegen L; Brysbaert M; Davis CJ
    Brain Lang; 2009 Feb; 108(2):112-21. PubMed ID: 18657313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Examining the time course of indexical specificity effects in spoken word recognition.
    McLennan CT; Luce PA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2005 Mar; 31(2):306-21. PubMed ID: 15755247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Age-related influences on lexical selection and orthographic encoding during homophone spelling.
    White KK; Abrams L; Palm GM; Protasi MA
    Psychol Aging; 2012 Mar; 27(1):67-79. PubMed ID: 21787089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Recognition intent and visual word recognition.
    Wang MY; Ching CL
    Conscious Cogn; 2009 Mar; 18(1):65-77. PubMed ID: 19036609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Sequential effects in the lexical decision task: the role of the item frequency of the previous trial.
    Perea M; Carreiras M
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2003 Apr; 56(3):385-401. PubMed ID: 12745840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Orthographic neighborhood effects in reading Chinese two-character words.
    Huang HW; Lee CY; Tsai JL; Lee CL; Hung DL; Tzeng OJ
    Neuroreport; 2006 Jul; 17(10):1061-5. PubMed ID: 16791104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. The developmental turnpoint of orthographic consistency effects in speech recognition.
    Ventura P; Kolinsky R; Pattamadilok C; Morais J
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2008 Jun; 100(2):135-45. PubMed ID: 18328498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Visual word recognition by bilinguals in a sentence context: evidence for nonselective lexical access.
    Duyck W; Assche EV; Drieghe D; Hartsuiker RJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Jul; 33(4):663-79. PubMed ID: 17576146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. The nature of the homophone density effect: an ERP study with Chinese spoken monosyllable homophones.
    Wang W; Li X; Ning N; Zhang JX
    Neurosci Lett; 2012 May; 516(1):67-71. PubMed ID: 22484016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Category size effects revisited: frequency and masked priming effects in semantic categorization.
    Forster KI
    Brain Lang; 2004; 90(1-3):276-86. PubMed ID: 15172545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. The processing advantage and disadvantage for homophones in lexical decision tasks.
    Hino Y; Kusunose Y; Lupker SJ; Jared D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Mar; 39(2):529-51. PubMed ID: 22905930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. A model for evidence accumulation in the lexical decision task.
    Wagenmakers EJ; Steyvers M; Raaijmakers JG; Shiffrin RM; van Rijn H; Zeelenberg R
    Cogn Psychol; 2004 May; 48(3):332-67. PubMed ID: 15020215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Testing the multiple in the multiple read-out model of visual word recognition.
    De Moor W; Verguts T; Brysbaert M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2005 Nov; 31(6):1502-8. PubMed ID: 16393060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Differential activation of frontal and parietal regions during visual word recognition: an optical topography study.
    Hofmann MJ; Herrmann MJ; Dan I; Obrig H; Conrad M; Kuchinke L; Jacobs AM; Fallgatter AJ
    Neuroimage; 2008 Apr; 40(3):1340-9. PubMed ID: 18262438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. When are neighbours hostile? Inhibitory neighbour effects in visual word recognition.
    De Moor W; Verguts T
    Psychol Res; 2006 Sep; 70(5):359-66. PubMed ID: 15924244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Masked inhibitory priming in english: evidence for lexical inhibition.
    Davis CJ; Lupker SJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Jun; 32(3):668-87. PubMed ID: 16822131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.