BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

228 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12746148)

  • 1. Outgroup misplacement and phylogenetic inaccuracy under a molecular clock--a simulation study.
    Holland BR; Penny D; Hendy MD
    Syst Biol; 2003 Apr; 52(2):229-38. PubMed ID: 12746148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The problem of rooting rapid radiations.
    Shavit L; Penny D; Hendy MD; Holland BR
    Mol Biol Evol; 2007 Nov; 24(11):2400-11. PubMed ID: 17720690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Relative efficiencies of the maximum-likelihood, neighbor-joining, and maximum-parsimony methods when substitution rate varies with site.
    Tateno Y; Takezaki N; Nei M
    Mol Biol Evol; 1994 Mar; 11(2):261-77. PubMed ID: 8170367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Phylogenetic analysis and intraspecific variation: performance of parsimony, likelihood, and distance methods.
    Wiens JJ; Servedio MR
    Syst Biol; 1998 Jun; 47(2):228-53. PubMed ID: 12064228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A simulation comparison of phylogeny algorithms under equal and unequal evolutionary rates.
    Kuhner MK; Felsenstein J
    Mol Biol Evol; 1994 May; 11(3):459-68. PubMed ID: 8015439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony and likelihood methods.
    Yang Z
    J Mol Evol; 1996 Feb; 42(2):294-307. PubMed ID: 8919881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Systematics of the lizard family pygopodidae with implications for the diversification of Australian temperate biotas.
    Jennings WB; Pianka ER; Donnellan S
    Syst Biol; 2003 Dec; 52(6):757-80. PubMed ID: 14668116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. DO PHYLOGENETIC METHODS PRODUCE TREES WITH BIASED SHAPES?
    Huelsenbeck JP; Kirkpatrick M
    Evolution; 1996 Aug; 50(4):1418-1424. PubMed ID: 28565707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Relative efficiencies of the maximum likelihood, maximum parsimony, and neighbor-joining methods for estimating protein phylogeny.
    Hasegawa M; Fujiwara M
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 1993 Mar; 2(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 8081543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The robustness of two phylogenetic methods: four-taxon simulations reveal a slight superiority of maximum likelihood over neighbor joining.
    Huelsenbeck JP
    Mol Biol Evol; 1995 Sep; 12(5):843-9. PubMed ID: 7476130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Efficiencies of fast algorithms of phylogenetic inference under the criteria of maximum parsimony, minimum evolution, and maximum likelihood when a large number of sequences are used.
    Takahashi K; Nei M
    Mol Biol Evol; 2000 Aug; 17(8):1251-8. PubMed ID: 10908645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Molecular systematics of terraranas (Anura: Brachycephaloidea) with an assessment of the effects of alignment and optimality criteria.
    Padial JM; Grant T; Frost DR
    Zootaxa; 2014 Jun; 3825():1-132. PubMed ID: 24989881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cases in which ancestral maximum likelihood will be confusingly misleading.
    Handelman T; Chor B
    J Theor Biol; 2017 May; 420():318-323. PubMed ID: 28263816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Using ESTs for phylogenomics: can one accurately infer a phylogenetic tree from a gappy alignment?
    Hartmann S; Vision TJ
    BMC Evol Biol; 2008 Mar; 8():95. PubMed ID: 18366758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluating the relationship between evolutionary divergence and phylogenetic accuracy in AFLP data sets.
    García-Pereira MJ; Caballero A; Quesada H
    Mol Biol Evol; 2010 May; 27(5):988-1000. PubMed ID: 20026482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Performance of maximum parsimony and likelihood phylogenetics when evolution is heterogeneous.
    Kolaczkowski B; Thornton JW
    Nature; 2004 Oct; 431(7011):980-4. PubMed ID: 15496922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Upper bounds on maximum likelihood for phylogenetic trees.
    Hendy MD; Holland BR
    Bioinformatics; 2003 Oct; 19 Suppl 2():ii66-72. PubMed ID: 14534174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effects of sequence length, tree topology, and number of taxa on the performance of phylogenetic methods.
    Charleston MA; Hendy MD; Penny D
    J Comput Biol; 1994; 1(2):133-51. PubMed ID: 8790460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Likelihood, parsimony, and heterogeneous evolution.
    Spencer M; Susko E; Roger AJ
    Mol Biol Evol; 2005 May; 22(5):1161-4. PubMed ID: 15746012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Statistical properties of bootstrap estimation of phylogenetic variability from nucleotide sequences: II. Four taxa without a molecular clock.
    Zharkikh A; Li WH
    J Mol Evol; 1992 Oct; 35(4):356-66. PubMed ID: 1404421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.