These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12747477)

  • 1. Characterization of the magnetic fields around walk-through and hand-held metal detectors.
    Boivin W; Coletta J; Kerr L
    Health Phys; 2003 May; 84(5):582-93. PubMed ID: 12747477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Detection of implanted metallic devices by airport security.
    Asch M; Liu D; Mawdsley G
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 1997; 8(6):1011-4. PubMed ID: 9399471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Personal medical electronic devices and walk-through metal detector security systems: assessing electromagnetic interference effects.
    Guag J; Addissie B; Witters D
    Biomed Eng Online; 2017 Mar; 16(1):33. PubMed ID: 28320451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Implantable cardiac pacemaker electromagnetic compatibility testing in a novel security system simulator.
    Kainz W; Casamento JP; Ruggera PS; Chan DD; Witters DM
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2005 Mar; 52(3):520-30. PubMed ID: 15759582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Calculation of induced current densities and specific absorption rates (SAR) for pregnant women exposed to hand-held metal detectors.
    Kainz W; Chan DD; Casamento JP; Bassen HI
    Phys Med Biol; 2003 Aug; 48(15):2551-60. PubMed ID: 12953914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Safety of screening procedures with hand-held metal detectors among patients with implanted cardiac rhythm devices: a cross-sectional analysis.
    Jilek C; Tzeis S; Vrazic H; Semmler V; Andrikopoulos G; Reents T; Fichtner S; Ammar S; Rassias I; Theodorakis G; Weber S; Hessling G; Deisenhofer I; Kolb C
    Ann Intern Med; 2011 Nov; 155(9):587-92. PubMed ID: 22041947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Test of radiation detectors used in homeland security applications.
    Pibida L; Minniti R; O'Brien M; Unterweger M
    Health Phys; 2005 May; 88(5 Suppl):S84-90. PubMed ID: 15824588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Metallic orthopaedic implants and airport metal detectors.
    Kamineni S; Legge S; Ware H
    J Arthroplasty; 2002 Jan; 17(1):62-5. PubMed ID: 11805926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. AMANDE: a new facility for monoenergetic neutron fields production between 2 keV and 20 MeV.
    Gressier V; Guerre-Chaley JF; Lacoste V; Lebreton L; Pelcot G; Pochat JL; Bolognese-Milstajn T; Champion D
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 110(1-4):49-52. PubMed ID: 15353620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Development and evaluation of intermediate frequency magnetic field exposure system for studies of in vitro biological effects.
    Fujita A; Hirota I; Kawahara Y; Omori H
    Bioelectromagnetics; 2007 Oct; 28(7):538-45. PubMed ID: 17570495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Close-geometry efficiency calibration of p-type HPGe detectors with a Cs-134 point source.
    DeFelice P; Fazio A; Vidmar T; Korun M
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2006; 64(10-11):1303-6. PubMed ID: 16549352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of various safety guidelines for electronic article surveillance devices with pulsed magnetic fields.
    Kang G; Gandhi OP
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2003 Jan; 50(1):107-13. PubMed ID: 12617530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. In vitro exposure apparatus for ELF magnetic fields.
    Schuderer J; Oesch W; Felber N; Spät D; Kuster N
    Bioelectromagnetics; 2004 Dec; 25(8):582-91. PubMed ID: 15515036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dose response of selected solid state detectors in applied homogeneous transverse and longitudinal magnetic fields.
    Reynolds M; Fallone BG; Rathee S
    Med Phys; 2014 Sep; 41(9):092103. PubMed ID: 25186403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Calculation of magnetic field-induced current densities for humans from EAS countertop activation/deactivation devices that use ferromagnetic cores.
    Li Q; Gandhi OP
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Jan; 50(2):373-85. PubMed ID: 15742951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. UMTS signal measurements with digital spectrum analysers.
    Licitra G; Palazzuoli D; Ricci AS; Silvi AM
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 111(4):397-401. PubMed ID: 15550709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A new approach in dose measurement and error analysis for narrow photon beams (beamlets) shaped by different multileaf collimators using a small detector.
    Li S; Rashid A; He S; Djajaputra D
    Med Phys; 2004 Jul; 31(7):2020-32. PubMed ID: 15305454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Supplementary values of the dosimetric parameters kNR and Em for various types of detectors in 6 and 15 MV photon fields.
    Chofor N; Harder D; Poppe B
    Z Med Phys; 2014 Mar; 24(1):27-37. PubMed ID: 23642543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Quality assurance and quality control methodologies used within the Austrian UV monitoring network.
    Mario B
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 111(4):359-62. PubMed ID: 15550702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A realistic field facility to simulate reactor spectra.
    Taylor GC; Thomas DJ; Bennett A
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 110(1-4):111-5. PubMed ID: 15353632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.