122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12747482)
1. Radiation dose reduction in invasive cardiology by restriction to adequate instead of optimized picture quality.
Kuon E; Dorn C; Schmitt M; Dahm JB
Health Phys; 2003 May; 84(5):626-31. PubMed ID: 12747482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effective techniques for reduction of radiation dosage to patients undergoing invasive cardiac procedures.
Kuon E; Glaser C; Dahm JB
Br J Radiol; 2003 Jun; 76(906):406-13. PubMed ID: 12814927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Fluoroscopy time -- an overestimated factor for patient radiation exposure in invasive cardiology].
Kuon E; Robinson DM; Empen K; Dahm JB
Rofo; 2005 Jun; 177(6):812-7. PubMed ID: 15902630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Patient radiation dose reduction using an X-ray imaging noise reduction technology for cardiac angiography and intervention.
Nakamura S; Kobayashi T; Funatsu A; Okada T; Mauti M; Waizumi Y; Yamada S
Heart Vessels; 2016 May; 31(5):655-63. PubMed ID: 25840815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Long-term efficacy of a mini-course in radiation-reducing techniques in invasive cardiology.
Kuon E; Empen K; Weitmann K; Staudt A; Hummel A; Dörr M; Reffelmann T; Hoffmann W; Felix SB
Rofo; 2013 Aug; 185(8):720-5. PubMed ID: 23696018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Are new technologies always reducing patient doses in cardiac procedures?
Trianni A; Bernardi G; Padovani R
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):97-101. PubMed ID: 16461516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Short communication: time of day influences patient radiation exposure from percutaneous cardiac interventions.
Kuon E; Dahm JB; Schmitt M; Glaser C; Gefeller O; Pfahlberg A
Br J Radiol; 2003 Mar; 76(903):189-91. PubMed ID: 12684234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dose performance evaluation of a charge coupled device and a flat-panel digital fluoroscopy system recently installed in an interventional cardiology laboratory.
Tsapaki V; Kottou S; Kollaros N; Dafnomili P; Kyriakidis Z; Neofotistou V
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 111(3):297-304. PubMed ID: 15266080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Predialing the number of cinegraphic frames enables an effective patient dose due to coronary angiography of 0.8 mSv.
Kuon E; Schmitt M; Dorn C; Pfahlberg A; Gefeller O; Dahm JB
Rofo; 2003 Dec; 175(12):1706-10. PubMed ID: 14661143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Efficacy of a minicourse in radiation-reducing techniques in invasive cardiology: a multicenter field study.
Kuon E; Weitmann K; Hoffmann W; Dörr M; Reffelmann T; Hummel A; Riad A; Busch MC; Empen K; Felix SB
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 Apr; 7(4):382-90. PubMed ID: 24630883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Radiation-reducing planning of cardiac catheterisation.
Kuon E; Dahm JB; Robinson DM; Empen K; Günther M; Wucherer W
Z Kardiol; 2005 Oct; 94(10):663-73. PubMed ID: 16200481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Does a flat panel detector reduce the patient radiation dose in interventional cardiology?
Dragusin O; Breisch R; Bokou C; Beissel J
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010; 139(1-3):266-70. PubMed ID: 20139267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Radiation dose reduction in the cardiac catheterization laboratory utilizing a novel protocol.
Wassef AW; Hiebert B; Ravandi A; Ducas J; Minhas K; Vo M; Kass M; Parmar G; Hussain F
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 May; 7(5):550-7. PubMed ID: 24746655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of radiographic techniques (kVp and mAs) on image quality and patient doses in digital subtraction angiography.
Gkanatsios NA; Huda W; Peters KR
Med Phys; 2002 Aug; 29(8):1643-50. PubMed ID: 12201409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Protocols for dosimetry and patient reference levels.
Faulkner K
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):195-8. PubMed ID: 16461510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Dose to cardiologists in haemodynamic and electrophysiology cardiac interventional procedures.
Trianni A; Padovani R; Foti C; Cragnolini E; Chizzola G; Toh H; Bernardi G; Proclemer A
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):111-5. PubMed ID: 16461486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Uterine artery embolization for leiomyomata: optimization of the radiation dose to the patient using a flat-panel detector angiographic suite.
Sapoval M; Pellerin O; Rehel JL; Houdoux N; Rahmoune G; Aubert B; Fitton I
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2010 Oct; 33(5):949-54. PubMed ID: 20094719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Radiation exposure to patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions: are current reference values too high?
Kuon E; Empen K; Rohde D; Dahm JB
Herz; 2004 Mar; 29(2):208-17. PubMed ID: 15054590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Radiation dose of interventional radiology system using a flat-panel detector.
Chida K; Inaba Y; Saito H; Ishibashi T; Takahashi S; Kohzuki M; Zuguchi M
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Dec; 193(6):1680-5. PubMed ID: 19933664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Radiation doses to patients from digital subtraction angiography.
Goni H; Tsalafoutas IA; Tzortzis G; Pappas P; Bouzas N; Loulakas J; Georgiou A; Georgiou E; Yakoumakis EN
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):251-5. PubMed ID: 16461514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
